Pranata Raymond, Yonas Emir, Chintya Veresa, Deka Hadrian, Raharjo Sunu Budhi
Faculty of Medicine Universitas Pelita Harapan Tangerang Indonesia.
Faculty of Medicine Universitas YARSI Jakarta Indonesia.
J Arrhythm. 2019 May 14;35(4):584-590. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12188. eCollection 2019 Aug.
Risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic Brugada Syndrome is challenging, and despite recent advances, there is no clear evidence. The first-degree atrioventricular block was hypothesized to be a predictor of arrhythmic events. Measurement of the PR interval and diagnosing atrioventricular block from surface ECG is easy, noninvasive, and cost-effective. We aimed to assess the latest evidence on PR interval or first-degree atrioventricular block and major arrhythmic events related to Brugada Syndrome.
We performed a comprehensive search in PubMed for "atrioventricular block" OR "PR interval" and "Brugada syndrome." We included studies that have a component of PR interval and/or first-degree atrioventricular block and major arrhythmic events related to Brugada Syndrome including syncope/VT/VF/appropriate ICD shocks/ICD implantation.
We included 1526 subjects from 7 studies. Pooled mean difference of PR interval in 4 studies showed a significant difference [MD 10.77 ms (2.97-18.57) = 0.007, moderate-high heterogeneity I = 53% = 0.08]. On sensitivity analysis by removing a study, it became MD 6.50 ms [1.97-11.03], = 0.005, heterogeneity I = 0% = 0.52. Indicating that PR interval was prolonged by small margin. Pooled analysis of the association between a first-degree atrioventricular block and major arrhythmic events was significant [OR 3.33 (2.02-5.50) < 0.001, low heterogeneity I = 0% = 0.57].
First-degree AV block is associated with more frequent major arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome patients. PR interval seemed to be prolonged but is yet to be determined whether the PR interval association is still significant if it did not cross the first-degree AVB threshold.
无症状 Brugada 综合征患者的危险分层具有挑战性,尽管最近有进展,但尚无明确证据。一度房室传导阻滞被假设为心律失常事件的预测指标。从体表心电图测量 PR 间期并诊断房室传导阻滞简便、无创且经济有效。我们旨在评估关于 PR 间期或一度房室传导阻滞与 Brugada 综合征相关的主要心律失常事件的最新证据。
我们在 PubMed 中全面检索了“房室传导阻滞”或“PR 间期”以及“Brugada 综合征”。我们纳入了包含 PR 间期和/或一度房室传导阻滞以及与 Brugada 综合征相关的主要心律失常事件(包括晕厥/室性心动过速/心室颤动/合适的植入式心律转复除颤器电击/植入式心律转复除颤器植入)的研究。
我们纳入了来自 7 项研究的 1526 名受试者。4 项研究中 PR 间期的合并平均差异显示有显著差异[MD 10.77 ms(2.97 - 18.57),P = 0.007,中度 - 高度异质性 I² = 53%,P = 0.08]。通过剔除一项研究进行敏感性分析后,变为 MD 6.50 ms[1.97 - 11.03],P = 0.005,异质性 I² = 0%,P = 0.52。表明 PR 间期有小幅延长。一度房室传导阻滞与主要心律失常事件之间关联的合并分析具有显著性[OR 3.33(2.02 - 5.50),P < 0.001,低异质性 I² = 0%,P = 0.57]。
一度房室传导阻滞与 Brugada 综合征患者更频繁的主要心律失常事件相关。PR 间期似乎延长,但如果未超过一度房室传导阻滞阈值,PR 间期关联是否仍具有显著性尚待确定。