Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Aug;3(4):540-543. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
Two phase 3 trials, COMET-1 and COMET-2, have reported that cabozantinib did not significantly extend overall survival (OS) compared to prednisone and prednisone plus mitoxantrone, respectively, in post-docetaxel patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We conducted a retrospective analysis of a combined data set from these trials to identify a benefit in subsets of patients according to prognostic risk factors. The prognostic ability of factors to predict survival was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Evaluation of potential beneficial subsets was performed using interaction terms between factors and cabozantinib. All tests were two-sided and p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 1147 post-docetaxel patients with mCRPC were available (1028 from COMET-1 and 119 from COMET-2). The following factors were prognostic for OS: age, disease-free interval, hemoglobin, prostate-specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, bone scan lesion area, lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and pain (all p<0.05). There was no interaction effect on survival between cabozantinib versus comparator arms and any prognostic group. After adjusting for prognostic factors, cabozantinib was associated with better OS (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.95; p=0.012). Further investigation of cabozantinib in a better-powered trial or a rational patient population based on a molecular biomarker may be warranted. PATIENT SUMMARY: Two phase 3 trials have reported no survival benefit for cabozantinib, a multitarget oral drug, in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This analysis pooled 1147 patients from these trials to identify a survival benefit for cabozantinib. This study suggests that further rational development may be justified.
两项 3 期临床试验(COMET-1 和 COMET-2)报告称,卡博替尼与泼尼松和泼尼松联合米托蒽醌相比,分别在多西他赛治疗后转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者中未显著延长总生存期(OS)。我们对这两项试验的合并数据集进行了回顾性分析,根据预后危险因素确定了亚组患者的获益情况。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估因素预测生存的能力。使用因素与卡博替尼之间的交互项评估潜在有益亚组。所有检验均为双侧检验,p≤0.05 为具有统计学意义。共有 1147 例多西他赛治疗后 mCRPC 患者可用于分析(COMET-1 中 1028 例,COMET-2 中 119 例)。以下因素与 OS 相关:年龄、无病间隔、血红蛋白、前列腺特异性抗原、碱性磷酸酶、白蛋白、骨扫描病变面积、乳酸脱氢酶、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态和疼痛(均 p<0.05)。卡博替尼与对照药物在任何预后组之间的生存均无交互作用。调整预后因素后,卡博替尼与更好的 OS 相关(风险比 0.80,95%置信区间 0.67-0.95;p=0.012)。可能需要在更有力的试验或基于分子生物标志物的合理患者人群中进一步研究卡博替尼。患者总结:两项 3 期临床试验报告称,多靶点口服药物卡博替尼在转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌中无生存获益。本分析对这两项试验的 1147 例患者进行了汇总,以确定卡博替尼的生存获益。这项研究表明,进一步的合理开发可能是合理的。