Huber Carola A, Agosti Reto, Näpflin Markus, Blozik Eva
Department of Health Sciences, Helsana Insurance Group, Zürich, Switzerland.
Headache Center Hirslanden, Hirslanden Hospital Group, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 19;12:2211-2221. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S207606. eCollection 2019.
The newly developed calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists were recently launched on the US and European market, with Switzerland as the second country worldwide. To enable forthcoming comparisons with established migraine therapy, the aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive picture of migraine (prophylactic) treatment patterns. Recent data in daily clinical practice are lacking.
This population-based cohort study included enrollees from a Swiss Healthcare Insurance Database with at least one triptan prescription in 2015. Treatment patterns were defined by assessing subsequent triptan and prophylactic medication use (after index prescription for triptan) within the following year, divided into four quarters.
Triptans were used by 10,090 patients (1.3%) in 2015. Most of them used triptan only (82.6%), 12.9% changed the treatment between triptan and prophylactics, and 4.5% received both in combination within 1year. Among triptan users with ≥1 prophylactic prescription in the first quarter, 48.6% used beta-blockers (BB), 40.7% "other prophylactics than BB (eg, topiramate)", and 10.7% "a combination of both". Most patients who received both BB and other prophylactics in the first quarter used this drug combination continuously over all four quarters.
This study provides comprehensive data on treatment patterns prior to the introduction of a new drug class in migraine therapy. The majority of triptan users had no prophylactic medication therapy; however, a small, but relevant group used BB and other prophylactics concurrently in all quarters. Findings quantify the population in potential need for optimized migraine therapy, ie, the potential target population of the novel CGRP-targeted drugs.
新研发的降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)拮抗剂最近在美国和欧洲市场上市,瑞士是全球第二个引入该药物的国家。为了便于与现有的偏头痛治疗方法进行比较,本研究旨在全面了解偏头痛(预防性)治疗模式。目前缺乏日常临床实践中的最新数据。
这项基于人群的队列研究纳入了来自瑞士医疗保险数据库的参保者,这些参保者在2015年至少有一次曲坦类药物处方。通过评估次年(分为四个季度)后续曲坦类药物和预防性药物的使用情况(曲坦类药物索引处方之后)来确定治疗模式。
2015年有10,090名患者(1.3%)使用了曲坦类药物。其中大多数仅使用曲坦类药物(82.6%),12.9%在曲坦类药物和预防性药物之间更换治疗方法,4.5%在1年内同时接受了两者的联合治疗。在第一季度有≥1次预防性处方的曲坦类药物使用者中,48.6%使用β受体阻滞剂(BB),40.7%使用“除BB之外的其他预防性药物(如托吡酯)”,10.7%使用“两者的联合用药”。第一季度同时接受BB和其他预防性药物治疗的大多数患者在所有四个季度都持续使用这种药物组合。
本研究提供了偏头痛治疗中引入新药物类别之前治疗模式的全面数据。大多数曲坦类药物使用者没有预防性药物治疗;然而,一小部分但相关的群体在所有季度都同时使用BB和其他预防性药物。研究结果量化了可能需要优化偏头痛治疗的人群,即新型CGRP靶向药物的潜在目标人群。