Zhu Mei, Zhu Zhijun, Yang Jizhong, Hu Kaiming
Clin Lab. 2019 Aug 1;65(8). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.181109.
To explore the application value of IGRA-ELISA in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.
A total of 68 tuberculosis and 58 other pulmonary disease case samples were obtained. All the samples were tested by IGRA-ELISA and T-SPOT.TB assay in parallel. The consistency of IGRA-ELISA and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of TB was analyzed. Five different methods for the diagnosis of TB were assayed: IGRA-ELISA, T-SPOT.TB, AFB staining, TB-Ab, and PPD. For the different PPD positive degrees, IGRA-ELISA and T-SPOT.TB positive rates were calculated. AFB staining positive and negative samples were analyzed by IGRA-ELISA, T-SPOT.TB, TB-Ab, and PPD. Positive rates, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy values of the five different detection methods were compared.
There was good consistency between IGRA-ELISA and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of TB and other pulmonary diseases. Compared with T-SPOT.TB, there was a significant correlation between the absorbance value of IGRA-ELISA and the number of ESAT-6 or CFP-10-specific SFCs (r = 0.902, p < 0.001; r = 0.901, p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the positive rates among the above five different detection methods in the TB group and non-TB group (p < 0.001). For the different PPD positive degrees, there were highly significant differences in the positive rates of IGRA-ELISA and T-SPOT.TB in non-TB group; no similar trend was observed in the TB group. No significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, LR+ and LR- were observed between IGRA-ELISA and T-SPOT.TB. The positive rates of IGRA-ELISA and T-SPOT.TB in the TB group were significantly higher than that of AFB staining, TB-Ab, and PPD (p < 0.05). IGRA-ELISA and T-SPOT.TB combined with AFB staining could further improve the sensitivity of tuberculosis detection without reducing its specificity. The AUC of IGRA-ELISA, ESAT-6, CFP-10, and T-SPOT.TB were 0.923, 0.893, 0.937, and 0.919, respectively.
There was good correlation and consistency between the IGRA-ELISA and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of TB. The sensitivity and accuracy of IGRA-ELISA were significantly better than those of AFB staining, TB-Ab, and PPD. IGRA-ELISA combined with AFB staining could further improve the diagnosis of tuberculosis.
探讨IGRA-ELISA在结核病诊断中的应用价值。
共获取68例结核病病例样本和58例其他肺部疾病病例样本。所有样本同时采用IGRA-ELISA和T-SPOT.TB检测法进行检测。分析IGRA-ELISA和T-SPOT.TB在结核病诊断中的一致性。检测了五种不同的结核病诊断方法:IGRA-ELISA、T-SPOT.TB、抗酸杆菌染色、结核抗体及结核菌素试验。计算不同结核菌素试验阳性程度下IGRA-ELISA和T-SPOT.TB的阳性率。对抗酸杆菌染色阳性和阴性样本进行IGRA-ELISA、T-SPOT.TB、结核抗体及结核菌素试验分析。比较五种不同检测方法的阳性率、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性。
IGRA-ELISA和T-SPOT.TB在结核病及其他肺部疾病诊断中具有良好的一致性。与T-SPOT.TB相比,IGRA-ELISA的吸光度值与ESAT-6或CFP-10特异性斑点形成细胞数量之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.902,p < 0.001;r = 0.901,p < 0.001)。上述五种不同检测方法在结核病组和非结核病组的阳性率存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。对于不同的结核菌素试验阳性程度,非结核病组中IGRA-ELISA和T-SPOT.TB的阳性率存在高度显著差异;结核病组未观察到类似趋势。IGRA-ELISA和T-SPOT.TB在敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确性、阳性似然比和阴性似然比方面未观察到显著差异。结核病组中IGRA-ELISA和T-SPOT.TB的阳性率显著高于抗酸杆菌染色、结核抗体及结核菌素试验(p < 0.05)。IGRA-ELISA和T-SPOT.TB联合抗酸杆菌染色可在不降低特异性的情况下进一步提高结核病检测的敏感性。IGRA-ELISA、ESAT-6、CFP-10及T-SPOT.TB的曲线下面积分别为0.923、0.893、0.937和0.919。
IGRA-ELISA和T-SPOT.TB在结核病诊断中具有良好的相关性和一致性。IGRA-ELISA的敏感性和准确性显著优于抗酸杆菌染色、结核抗体及结核菌素试验。IGRA-ELISA联合抗酸杆菌染色可进一步提高结核病的诊断水平。