• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲甲基异噻唑啉酮接触过敏的流行:对不断变化的暴露情况的随访。

The epidemic of methylisothiazolinone contact allergy in Europe: follow-up on changing exposures.

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Occupational Medicine, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Feb;34(2):333-339. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15875. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1111/jdv.15875
PMID:31419348
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methylisothiazolinone (MI) has caused an unprecedented epidemic of contact allergy in Europe and elsewhere. Subsequently, regulatory action has been taken, at least in Europe, aiming at reducing risk of MI sensitization.

OBJECTIVE

To follow-up on the prevalence of contact allergy to MI in consecutively patch tested patients and assess the spectrum of products containing MI or methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/MI in patients positive to MI which elicited current allergic contact dermatitis.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was performed in 2016 and 2017, including all adult patients patch tested with the baseline series (including MI 0.2% aq.) between 1 May and 31 October at 14 centres in 11 European countries. Patients with positive reactions (+ to +++) to MI were further examined regarding history, clinical characteristics and eliciting products, which were categorized into 34 types and 4 classes (leave-on, rinse-off, household, occupational). The results were compared with the reference year 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 317 patients, n = 202 of 4278 tested in 2016 (4.72%) and n = 115 of 3879 tested in 2017 (2.96%), had positive reactions to MI; the previous result from 2015 was 5.97% (P < 0.0001). The share of currently relevant contact allergy among all positive reactions declined significantly as well (P = 0.0032). Concerning product classes, a relative decline of leave-on and a relative increase of rinse-off and household products was noted.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of MI contact allergy decreased by 50% from 2015 to 2017. As a consequence of regulation, the share of cosmetics products (leave-on in particular) eliciting allergic contact dermatitis is decreasing. The chosen method of analysing causative products in sensitized patients has proven useful to monitor effects of intervention.

摘要

背景

甲基异噻唑啉酮(MI)在欧洲和其他地区引发了前所未有的接触过敏流行。随后,至少在欧洲,采取了监管行动,旨在降低 MI 致敏的风险。

目的

随访连续斑贴试验患者中 MI 接触过敏的患病率,并评估对 MI 呈阳性且当前诱发变应性接触性皮炎的患者中含 MI 或甲基氯异噻唑啉酮(MCI)/MI 的产品的范围。

方法

2016 年和 2017 年进行了横断面调查,包括在 11 个欧洲国家的 14 个中心,于 5 月 1 日至 10 月 31 日期间对基线系列(包括 0.2% aq.MI)进行斑贴试验的所有成年患者。对 MI 阳性反应(+++至++++)的患者进一步检查病史、临床特征和诱发产品,将产品分为 34 种类型和 4 类(留用、冲洗、家用、职业)。结果与参考年 2015 年进行了比较。

结果

共有 317 例患者,2016 年检测的 4278 例中有 202 例(4.72%),2017 年检测的 3879 例中有 115 例(2.96%)对 MI 有阳性反应;前一年 2015 年的结果为 5.97%(P<0.0001)。目前所有阳性反应中与接触过敏相关的比例也显著下降(P=0.0032)。就产品类别而言,留用产品的比例相对下降,冲洗产品和家用产品的比例相对增加。

结论

从 2015 年到 2017 年,MI 接触过敏的患病率下降了 50%。由于监管,引发变应性接触性皮炎的化妆品产品(特别是留用产品)的份额正在减少。在致敏患者中分析致病产品的所选方法已被证明可用于监测干预效果。

相似文献

1
The epidemic of methylisothiazolinone contact allergy in Europe: follow-up on changing exposures.欧洲甲基异噻唑啉酮接触过敏的流行:对不断变化的暴露情况的随访。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Feb;34(2):333-339. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15875. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
2
Patch Testing for Methylisothiazolinone and Methylchloroisothiazolinone-Methylisothiazolinone Contact Allergy.甲基异噻唑啉酮和甲基氯异噻唑啉酮-甲基异噻唑啉酮接触过敏的斑贴试验。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Jan;152(1):67-72. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3606.
3
The epidemic of contact allergy to methylisothiazolinone-An analysis of Danish consecutive patients patch tested between 2005 and 2019.接触性过敏甲基异噻唑啉酮流行——2005 年至 2019 年丹麦连续接受斑贴试验患者的分析。
Contact Dermatitis. 2021 Apr;84(4):254-262. doi: 10.1111/cod.13717. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
4
The epidemic of methylisothiazolinone: a European prospective study.甲基异噻唑啉酮的流行情况:一项欧洲前瞻性研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2017 May;76(5):272-279. doi: 10.1111/cod.12733. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
5
Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone contact allergy: A 24-year, single-center, retrospective cohort study from Turkey.甲基氯异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮和甲基异噻唑啉酮接触过敏:来自土耳其的一项 24 年、单中心、回顾性队列研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2021 Jan;84(1):24-33. doi: 10.1111/cod.13656. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
6
Multicenter Patch Testing With Methylisothiazolinone and Methylchloroisothiazolinone/Methylisothiazolinone Within the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.国际接触性皮炎研究组内使用甲基异噻唑啉酮和甲基氯异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮的多中心斑贴试验
Dermatitis. 2017 May/Jun;28(3):210-214. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000272.
7
The dramatic increase in the rate of methylisothiazolinone contact allergy in Belgium: a multicentre study.比利时甲基异噻唑啉酮接触过敏率的急剧上升:一项多中心研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2014 Jul;71(1):41-8. doi: 10.1111/cod.12249. Epub 2014 May 12.
8
Epidemic of Isothiazolinone Allergy in North America: Prevalence Data From the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2013-2014.北美异噻唑啉酮过敏流行情况:来自北美接触性皮炎研究组的患病率数据,2013 - 2014年
Dermatitis. 2017 May/Jun;28(3):204-209. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000288.
9
Contact allergy caused by methylisothiazolinone: the Belgian-French experience.甲基异噻唑啉酮引起的接触性过敏:比利时 - 法国的经验
Eur J Dermatol. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):228-33. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2015.2608.
10
Sensitization to methylisothiazolinone in a group of methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone allergic patients.一组对甲基氯异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮过敏的患者对甲基异噻唑啉酮的致敏作用。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2013 Jun;32(2):99-101. doi: 10.3109/15569527.2012.707266. Epub 2012 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Contact Allergy in Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis: A Retrospective Study.特应性皮炎和银屑病中的接触性过敏:一项回顾性研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 19;15(6):766. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15060766.
2
Allergens Responsible for Contact Allergy in Children From 2010 to 2024: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2010年至2024年儿童接触性过敏的过敏原:系统评价与Meta分析
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 May;92(5):327-343. doi: 10.1111/cod.14753. Epub 2025 Jan 19.
3
Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Comprehensive Guide for Cosmetic Dermatologists.
额部纤维性秃发:美容皮肤科医生综合指南
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Jan;15(1):15-29. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01311-z. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
4
Incidence of allergic contact dermatitis in Finland 1998-2021: A nationwide registry-based study.1998 - 2021年芬兰过敏性接触性皮炎的发病率:一项基于全国登记处的研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Feb;92(2):113-119. doi: 10.1111/cod.14688. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
Standard Patch Test Results and Clinical Relevance: A Cross-Sectional Study of 10-year Retrospective Experience.标准斑贴试验结果与临床相关性:一项10年回顾性经验的横断面研究
Indian J Dermatol. 2022 May-Jun;67(3):258-264. doi: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_965_21.
6
Patch test results in a Dutch paediatric population with suspected contact allergy: A retrospective cohort study.荷兰疑似接触性皮炎患儿的斑贴试验结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2023 Feb;88(2):120-128. doi: 10.1111/cod.14231. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
7
Contact dermatitis.接触性皮炎。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 May 27;7(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00271-4.
8
What Is New in Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Year of the COVID Pandemic?新冠大流行之年职业性过敏性接触性皮炎有哪些新变化?
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021 Mar 29;21(4):26. doi: 10.1007/s11882-021-01000-3.
9
Contact allergy to polyhexamethylene biguanide (polyaminopropyl biguanide).对聚六亚甲基双胍(聚氨基丙基双胍)的接触过敏。
Contact Dermatitis. 2021 May;84(5):326-331. doi: 10.1111/cod.13728. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
10
Contact Allergy-Emerging Allergens and Public Health Impact.接触性过敏反应-新兴过敏原和公共卫生影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 1;17(7):2404. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072404.