• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于互联网的干预进食障碍的随机对照试验及专家-患者支持的附加价值:研究方案。

A randomized controlled trial of an Internet-based intervention for eating disorders and the added value of expert-patient support: study protocol.

机构信息

GGZ Rivierduinen Eetstoornissen Ursula, Postbox 405, Sandifortdreef 19, 2300 AK, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2019 Aug 16;20(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3574-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-019-3574-2
PMID:31420063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6697984/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

E-mental health has become increasingly popular in interventions for individuals with eating disorders (EDs). It has the potential to offer low-threshold interventions and guide individuals to the needed care more promptly. Featback is such an Internet-based intervention and consists of psychoeducation and a fully automated monitoring and feedback system. Preliminary findings suggest Featback to be (cost-)effective in reducing ED symptomatology. Additionally, e-mail or chat support by a psychologist did not enhance the effectiveness of Featback. Support by an expert patient (someone with a lived experience of an ED) might be more effective, since that person can effectively model healthy behavior and enhance self-efficacy in individuals struggling with an ED. The present study aims to replicate and build on earlier findings by further investigating the (cost-)effectiveness of Featback and the added value of expert-patient support.

METHODS

The study will be a randomized controlled trial with a two-by-two factorial design with repeated measures. The four conditions will be (1) Featback, in which participants receive automated feedback on a short monitoring questionnaire weekly, (2) Featback with weekly e-mail or chat support from an expert patient, (3) weekly support from an expert patient, and (4) a waiting list. Participants who are 16 years or older and have at least mild self-reported ED symptoms receive a baseline measure. Subsequently, they are randomized to one of the four conditions for 8 weeks. Participants will be assessed again post-intervention and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up. The primary outcome measure will be ED psychopathology. Secondary outcome measures are experienced social support, self-efficacy, symptoms of anxiety and depression, user satisfaction, intervention usage, and help-seeking attitudes and behaviors.

DISCUSSION

The current study is the first to investigate e-mental health in combination with expert-patient support for EDs and will add to the optimization of the delivery of Internet-based interventions and expert-patient support.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register, NTR7065 . Registered on 7 June 2018.

摘要

背景

电子心理健康在饮食障碍(ED)患者的干预措施中变得越来越受欢迎。它有潜力提供低门槛的干预措施,并更迅速地引导个人获得所需的护理。Featback 就是这样一种基于互联网的干预措施,它包括心理教育和一个完全自动化的监测和反馈系统。初步研究结果表明,Featback 在减少 ED 症状方面具有(成本)效益。此外,心理学家提供电子邮件或聊天支持并没有增强 Featback 的效果。由专家患者(即有 ED 生活经历的人)提供支持可能更有效,因为该人可以有效地模拟健康行为,并增强与 ED 作斗争的个体的自我效能感。本研究旨在通过进一步研究 Featback 的(成本)效益和专家患者支持的附加值,复制和扩展早期研究结果。

方法

该研究将是一项随机对照试验,采用两因素两水平重复测量设计。四个条件将是(1)Featback,其中参与者每周收到关于简短监测问卷的自动反馈,(2)Featback 每周收到专家患者的电子邮件或聊天支持,(3)每周收到专家患者的支持,(4)等待名单。年龄在 16 岁或以上且至少有轻度自我报告 ED 症状的参与者接受基线测量。随后,他们被随机分配到四个条件中的一个进行 8 周的干预。参与者将在干预后再次进行评估,并在 3、6、9 和 12 个月进行随访。主要结局指标将是 ED 心理病理学。次要结局指标是体验到的社会支持、自我效能感、焦虑和抑郁症状、用户满意度、干预使用情况以及寻求帮助的态度和行为。

讨论

本研究是首次调查电子心理健康与专家患者支持相结合在 ED 中的应用,并将有助于优化基于互联网的干预措施和专家患者支持的实施。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册中心,NTR7065。于 2018 年 6 月 7 日注册。

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of an Internet-based intervention for eating disorders and the added value of expert-patient support: study protocol.一项基于互联网的干预进食障碍的随机对照试验及专家-患者支持的附加价值:研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Aug 16;20(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3574-2.
2
Web-Based Fully Automated Self-Help With Different Levels of Therapist Support for Individuals With Eating Disorder Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的针对有饮食失调症状个体的不同程度治疗师支持的全自动自助:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 17;18(6):e159. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5709.
3
An Internet-based intervention for eating disorders consisting of automated computer-tailored feedback with or without supplemented frequent or infrequent support from a coach: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一种基于互联网的饮食失调干预措施,包括自动计算机定制反馈,有或没有教练提供的频繁或不频繁的补充支持:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Oct 17;14:340. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-340.
4
Cost-utility of an internet-based intervention with or without therapist support in comparison with a waiting list for individuals with eating disorder symptoms: a randomized controlled trial.与等待名单相比,有或没有治疗师支持的基于互联网的干预措施对有饮食失调症状个体的成本效益:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Dec;49(12):1068-1076. doi: 10.1002/eat.22587. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Effectiveness of an online self-help program, expert-patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial.在线自助计划、医患专家支持及其组合对进食障碍的有效性:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Oct;55(10):1361-1373. doi: 10.1002/eat.23785. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
6
Cost-effectiveness of three internet-based interventions for eating disorders: A randomized controlled trial.三种基于互联网的进食障碍干预措施的成本效益:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Aug;55(8):1143-1155. doi: 10.1002/eat.23763. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
Moderators of change in an Internet-based intervention for eating disorders with different levels of therapist support: What works for whom?针对饮食失调的基于互联网的干预措施中,不同治疗师支持水平下变化的调节因素:什么对谁有效?
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Feb;89:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.012. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
8
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of Internet-based selective eating disorder prevention: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial within the ProHEAD Consortium.基于互联网的选择性饮食失调预防的疗效和成本效益:ProHEAD联盟内一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jan 30;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3161-y.
9
Predictors and moderators of three online interventions for eating disorder symptoms in a randomized controlled trial.一项随机对照试验中针对饮食失调症状的三种在线干预措施的预测因素和调节因素
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Oct;56(10):1909-1918. doi: 10.1002/eat.24021. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
10
Effectiveness of enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-E) for eating disorders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.强化认知行为疗法(CBT-E)治疗饮食失调症的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Dec 3;17(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1716-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Personalized Dynamics in Eating Disorders: A Dynamic Time Warp Analysis.理解饮食失调中的个性化动态:动态时间规整分析
Int J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun;58(6):1048-1059. doi: 10.1002/eat.24407. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
The use of technology in the treatment of youth with eating disorders: A scoping review.技术在饮食失调青少年治疗中的应用:一项范围综述。
J Eat Disord. 2022 Nov 24;10(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00697-5.
3
Effectiveness of an online self-help program, expert-patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Pathways into treatment for eating disorders: A quantitative examination of treatment barriers and treatment attitudes.进食障碍治疗途径:治疗障碍和治疗态度的定量研究。
Eat Disord. 2018 Nov-Dec;26(6):556-574. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2018.1518086. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
2
Peer mentoring for eating disorders: evaluation of a pilot program.饮食失调的同伴指导:一项试点项目的评估
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Apr 18;4:75. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0268-6. eCollection 2018.
3
Benefits of a mentoring support program for individuals with an eating disorder: a proof of concept pilot program.
在线自助计划、医患专家支持及其组合对进食障碍的有效性:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Oct;55(10):1361-1373. doi: 10.1002/eat.23785. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
4
Cost-effectiveness of three internet-based interventions for eating disorders: A randomized controlled trial.三种基于互联网的进食障碍干预措施的成本效益:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Aug;55(8):1143-1155. doi: 10.1002/eat.23763. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
5
Subjective Experience of Antidepressant Prescription Among Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa.神经性厌食症青少年抗抑郁药处方的主观体验
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 4;13:770903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.770903. eCollection 2022.
6
Patient's Perspectives of Telepsychiatry: The Past, Present and Future.患者对远程精神病学的看法:过去、现在与未来
Indian J Psychol Med. 2020 Nov 1;42(5 Suppl):102S-107S. doi: 10.1177/0253717620963341. eCollection 2020 Oct.
针对饮食失调者的指导支持项目的益处:一项概念验证试点项目
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 7;10(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3026-6.
4
Update of the Dutch manual for costing studies in health care.《荷兰医疗保健成本研究手册》更新版
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187477. eCollection 2017.
5
Maximizing the public health impact of eating disorder services: A simulation study.最大限度地提高饮食失调服务对公众健康的影响:一项模拟研究。
Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Dec;50(12):1378-1384. doi: 10.1002/eat.22792. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
6
Detecting treatment-subgroup interactions in clustered data with generalized linear mixed-effects model trees.基于广义线性混合效应模型树检测聚类数据中的治疗亚组交互作用。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):2016-2034. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0971-x.
7
The effect of a lay-led, group-based self-management program for patients with chronic pain: a randomized controlled trial of the Danish version of the Chronic Pain Self-Management Programme.基于群组的非专业人员主导的自我管理项目对慢性疼痛患者的影响:丹麦版慢性疼痛自我管理方案的随机对照试验。
Pain. 2017 Aug;158(8):1437-1445. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000931.
8
Clinician-led, peer-led, and internet-delivered dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs: Acute effectiveness of these delivery modalities.由临床医生主导、同伴主导以及通过互联网提供的基于认知失调的饮食失调预防项目:这些实施方式的短期效果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Sep;85(9):883-895. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000211. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
9
Lay-led and peer support interventions for adolescents with asthma.针对哮喘青少年的由非专业人员主导和同伴支持的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 19;4(4):CD012331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012331.pub2.
10
Effectiveness of one-to-one peer support for patients with severe mental illness - a randomised controlled trial.一对一同伴支持对重症精神疾病患者的有效性——一项随机对照试验
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 May;42:103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 28.