Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 11;71(2):318-322. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz802.
Syphilis control among men who have sex with men (MSM) would be improved if we could increase the proportion of cases who present for treatment at the primary stage rather than at a later stage, as this would reduce their duration of infectivity. We hypothesized that MSM who practiced receptive anal intercourse were more likely to present with secondary syphilis, compared to MSM who did not practice receptive anal intercourse.
In this retrospective analysis of MSM diagnosed with primary or secondary syphilis at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between 2008 and 2017, we analyzed associations between the stage of syphilis (primary vs secondary) and behavioral data collected by computer-assisted self-interviews.
There were 559 MSM diagnosed with primary (n = 338) or secondary (n = 221) syphilis. Of these, 134 (24%) men reported not practicing receptive anal sex. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, MSM were more likely to present with secondary rather than primary syphilis if they reported practicing receptive anal intercourse (adjusted odds ratio 3.90; P < .001) after adjusting for age, human immunodeficiency virus status, and condom use. MSM with primary syphilis who did not practice receptive anal intercourse almost always (92%) had their primary syphilis lesion on their penis.
The finding that MSM who practiced receptive anal intercourse more commonly presented with secondary syphilis-and hence, had undetected syphilis during the primary stage-implies that anorectal syphilis chancres are less noticeable than penile chancres. These men may need additional strategies to improve early detection of anorectal chancres, to reduce their duration of infectivity and, hence, reduce onward transmission.Men who practiced receptive anal intercourse (AI) were more likely to present with secondary syphilis, compared to men who exclusively practiced insertive AI. Hence, men who practice receptive AI may need additional strategies to detect anal chancres, to reduce transmission.
如果我们能够增加在早期而不是晚期就诊的梅毒感染者比例,男男性行为者(MSM)的梅毒控制将会得到改善,因为这将降低他们的传染性持续时间。我们假设与不进行接受性肛交的 MSM 相比,进行接受性肛交的 MSM 更有可能出现二期梅毒。
在这项对 2008 年至 2017 年期间在墨尔本性健康中心诊断为一期或二期梅毒的 MSM 进行的回顾性分析中,我们分析了梅毒分期(一期 vs 二期)与计算机辅助自我访谈收集的行为数据之间的关联。
共有 559 名 MSM 被诊断为一期(n = 338)或二期(n = 221)梅毒。其中,134 名(24%)男性报告没有进行接受性肛交。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,在调整年龄、人类免疫缺陷病毒状态和避孕套使用情况后,报告进行接受性肛交的 MSM 更有可能出现二期而不是一期梅毒(调整后的优势比 3.90;P <.001)。没有进行接受性肛交的一期梅毒患者,他们的一期梅毒损伤几乎总是(92%)发生在阴茎上。
进行接受性肛交的 MSM 更常出现二期梅毒,因此在一期阶段存在未被发现的梅毒,这表明肛门直肠梅毒下疳比阴茎下疳更不容易被发现。这些男性可能需要额外的策略来改善肛门直肠下疳的早期发现,减少其传染性持续时间,从而减少传播。与仅进行插入性肛交的男性相比,进行接受性肛交的男性更有可能出现二期梅毒。因此,进行接受性肛交的男性可能需要额外的策略来检测肛门下疳,以减少传播。