Cancer Control and Populations Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Cancer Control and Populations Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Nov;58(5):864-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
Many hospitalized patients receive care that is not concordant with their goals. Teaching communication skills that better align goals and treatment can improve the care that patients receive.
To develop and test an innovative approach that encourages hospitalists to engage in goals of care (GOC) conversations with their patients.
We recruited 14 hospitalists and randomized half to receive electronic health record alerts for patients who might benefit most from a goals-of-care conversation, as well as communication coaching. The coaching required an initial meeting, then audio recording of two GOC conversations and feedback from the coach. Outcomes were the presence of GOC conversations (primary), the quality of the GOC conversations, physician perceptions of the intervention, and hospital metrics (e.g., 30-day readmissions, referrals to palliative care).
We did not increase the frequency of GOC conversations but did improve the quality of the conversations. Patients of physicians who received the intervention had fewer 30-day readmission rates and were less likely to die 90 days after admission than patients of physicians in the control arm. Patients of intervention physicians also had fewer palliative care consults than patients of control physicians.
Teaching hospitalists to have GOC conversations translated into better skills and outcomes for patients. This pilot study shows promise and should be tested in a larger trial.
许多住院患者接受的治疗与他们的治疗目标不一致。教授更能使目标和治疗相契合的沟通技巧可以改善患者所接受的治疗。
开发并测试一种创新方法,鼓励住院医师与患者进行治疗目标(GOC)对话。
我们招募了 14 名住院医师,并将其随机分为两组,一组对可能最需要进行治疗目标对话的患者进行电子健康记录提醒,并提供沟通辅导,辅导包括一次初始会议,然后录制两次 GOC 对话,并由教练提供反馈。结果为 GOC 对话的存在(主要结果)、GOC 对话的质量、医生对干预措施的看法以及医院指标(例如 30 天内再入院率、转介至姑息治疗)。
我们并没有增加 GOC 对话的频率,但确实提高了对话的质量。接受干预的医生的患者在 30 天内再入院率较低,在入院后 90 天内死亡的可能性也低于对照组医生的患者。干预组医生的患者接受姑息治疗咨询的次数也少于对照组医生的患者。
教导住院医师进行 GOC 对话可以转化为患者更好的技能和结果。这项试点研究显示出了希望,应该在更大的试验中进行测试。