• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁应对自动驾驶负责?利用风险管理框架和社会网络分析对英国自动驾驶进行的宏观层面洞察。

Who is responsible for automated driving? A macro-level insight into automated driving in the United Kingdom using the Risk Management Framework and Social Network Analysis.

机构信息

Human Factors Engineering, Transportation Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, SO16 7QF, UK.

Human Factors Engineering, Transportation Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, SO16 7QF, UK.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2019 Nov;81:102904. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102904. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102904
PMID:31422264
Abstract

To date, vehicle manufacturers have largely been left to their own initiatives when it comes to the design, development and implementation of automated driving features. Whilst this has enabled developments within the field to accelerate at a rapid pace, we are also now beginning to see the negative aspects of automated design (e.g., driver complacency, automation misuse and ethical dilemmas). It is therefore becoming increasingly important to identify systemic aspects that can address some of these Human Factors challenges. This paper applies the principles of the Risk Management Framework to explore the wider systemic issues associated with automated driving in the United Kingdom through the novel application of network metrics. The authors propose a number of recommendations targeted at each level of the Risk Management Framework that seek to shift the power of influence away from vehicle manufacturers and back into the hands of governing bodies.

摘要

迄今为止,在设计、开发和实施自动驾驶功能方面,汽车制造商在很大程度上只能依靠自己的主动性。虽然这使得该领域的发展能够快速加速,但我们也开始看到自动化设计的负面方面(例如,驾驶员自满、自动化滥用和道德困境)。因此,越来越有必要确定可以解决一些人为因素挑战的系统方面。本文通过网络指标的新应用,将风险管理框架的原则应用于探索英国自动驾驶相关的更广泛的系统问题。作者针对风险管理框架的各个层次提出了一些建议,旨在将影响力从汽车制造商转移到管理机构手中。

相似文献

1
Who is responsible for automated driving? A macro-level insight into automated driving in the United Kingdom using the Risk Management Framework and Social Network Analysis.谁应对自动驾驶负责?利用风险管理框架和社会网络分析对英国自动驾驶进行的宏观层面洞察。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Nov;81:102904. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102904. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
2
Driver-centred vehicle automation: using network analysis for agent-based modelling of the driver in highly automated driving systems.以驾驶员为中心的车辆自动化:在高度自动化驾驶系统中使用网络分析进行基于智能体的驾驶员建模。
Ergonomics. 2016 Nov;59(11):1442-1452. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1146344. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
3
Self-Driving Cars and Engineering Ethics: The Need for a System Level Analysis.自动驾驶汽车与工程伦理:需要系统层面的分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):383-398. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0006-0. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
Drivers are blamed more than their automated cars when both make mistakes.当司机和他们的自动驾驶汽车都犯错时,司机受到的指责比汽车更多。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;4(2):134-143. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0762-8. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
5
Autonomous Cars: In Favor of a Mandatory Ethics Setting.自动驾驶汽车:赞成强制性伦理设置。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):681-700. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9806-x. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
6
The influence of highly automated driving on the self-perception of drivers in the context of Conduct-by-Wire.线控驾驶背景下高度自动驾驶对驾驶员自我认知的影响。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(2):321-34. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.970587. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
7
Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future.掌控驾驶:实现未来汽车自动化
Appl Ergon. 2016 Mar;53 Pt B:389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
8
Preface to the special section on human factors and automation in vehicles: designing highly automated vehicles with the driver in mind.前言:车辆中人因与自动化特刊:以驾驶员为中心设计高度自动化车辆。
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):681-6. doi: 10.1177/0018720812461374.
9
Human Decisions in Moral Dilemmas are Largely Described by Utilitarianism: Virtual Car Driving Study Provides Guidelines for Autonomous Driving Vehicles.在道德困境中,人类的决策在很大程度上由功利主义描述:虚拟汽车驾驶研究为自动驾驶车辆提供了指导方针。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):399-418. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0020-x. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
10
Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-Mode and Conduct-by-Wire.面向高度自动化车辆的协同制导与控制:H 模式与线控执行。
Ergonomics. 2014;57(3):343-60. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.869355. Epub 2014 Feb 24.