School of Public Policy and Office of Graduate Studies, Georgia Institute of Technology, 685 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0345, USA.
Interdisciplinary Studies, Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):383-398. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0006-0. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
The literature on self-driving cars and ethics continues to grow. Yet much of it focuses on ethical complexities emerging from an individual vehicle. That is an important but insufficient step towards determining how the technology will impact human lives and society more generally. What must complement ongoing discussions is a broader, system level of analysis that engages with the interactions and effects that these cars will have on one another and on the socio-technical systems in which they are embedded. To bring the conversation of self-driving cars to the system level, we make use of two traffic scenarios which highlight some of the complexities that designers, policymakers, and others should consider related to the technology. We then describe three approaches that could be used to address such complexities and their associated shortcomings. We conclude by bringing attention to the "Moral Responsibility for Computing Artifacts: The Rules", a framework that can provide insight into how to approach ethical issues related to self-driving cars.
关于自动驾驶汽车和伦理学的文献不断增加。然而,其中的大部分都集中在单个车辆所产生的伦理复杂性上。这是朝着确定这项技术将如何更广泛地影响人类生活和社会迈出的重要但不充分的一步。必须补充正在进行的讨论的是更广泛的系统层面分析,该分析涉及这些汽车之间以及它们所嵌入的社会技术系统之间的相互作用和影响。为了将自动驾驶汽车的讨论提升到系统层面,我们使用了两个交通场景,这些场景突出了设计者、政策制定者和其他人应该考虑与技术相关的一些复杂性。然后,我们描述了三种可以用来解决这些复杂性及其相关缺点的方法。最后,我们提请注意“计算人工制品的道德责任:规则”,该框架可以提供深入了解如何处理与自动驾驶汽车相关的道德问题的方法。