Suppr超能文献

三级高血压诊所的舒张压血压 J 型曲线现象。

Diastolic Blood Pressure J-Curve Phenomenon in a Tertiary-Care Hypertension Clinic.

机构信息

From the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom (S.L., L.E.T., P.J., L.M., A.F.D., S.P.).

Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India (P.J.).

出版信息

Hypertension. 2019 Oct;74(4):767-775. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12787. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

Abstract

Concerns exist regarding the potential increased cardiovascular risk from lowering diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in hypertensive patients. We analyzed 30-year follow-up data of 10 355 hypertensive patients attending the Glasgow Blood Pressure Clinic. The association between blood pressure during the first 5 years of treatment and cause-specific hospital admissions or mortality was analyzed using multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular admissions and deaths. DBP showed a U-shaped association (nadir, 92 mm Hg) for the primary cardiovascular outcome hazard and a reverse J-shaped association with all-cause mortality (nadir, 86 mm Hg) and noncardiovascular mortality (nadir, 92 mm Hg). The hazard ratio for the primary cardiovascular outcome after adjustment for systolic blood pressure was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.18-1.62) for DBP <80 compared with DBP of 80 to 89.9 mm Hg (referrant), and the subdistribution hazard ratio after accounting for competing risk was 1.33 (1.17-1.51) compared with DBP ≥80 mm Hg. Cause-specific nonfatal outcome analyses showed a reverse J-shaped relationship for myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure admissions but a U-shaped relationship for stroke admissions. Age-stratified analyses showed DBP had no independent effect on stroke admissions among the older patient subgroup (≥60 years of age), but the younger subgroup showed a clear U-shaped relationship. Intensive blood pressure reduction may lead to unintended consequences of higher healthcare utilization because of increased cardiovascular morbidity, and this merits future prospective studies. Low on-treatment DBP is associated with increased risk of noncardiovascular mortality, the reasons for which are unclear.

摘要

人们对降低高血压患者的舒张压(DBP)可能带来的心血管风险增加存在担忧。我们分析了 10355 名在格拉斯哥血压诊所就诊的高血压患者的 30 年随访数据。使用多变量调整的 Cox 比例风险模型分析了治疗前 5 年的血压与特定原因的住院或死亡率之间的关系。主要结果是心血管住院和死亡的综合结果。DBP 与主要心血管结局的风险呈 U 形相关(最低点,92mmHg),与全因死亡率(最低点,86mmHg)和非心血管死亡率(最低点,92mmHg)呈反向 J 形相关。调整收缩压后,DBP<80mmHg 与 DBP 为 80-89.9mmHg(参照)相比,主要心血管结局的风险比为 1.38(95%CI,1.18-1.62),考虑竞争风险后的亚分布风险比为 1.33(1.17-1.51)与 DBP≥80mmHg 相比。特定原因的非致命性结局分析显示,心肌梗死、缺血性心脏病和心力衰竭入院呈反向 J 形关系,而卒中入院呈 U 形关系。分层分析显示,DBP 对年龄较大(≥60 岁)患者亚组的卒中入院无独立影响,但年龄较小亚组则表现出明显的 U 形关系。强化降压可能会因心血管发病率增加而导致医疗保健利用率增加,从而带来意想不到的后果,这值得未来进行前瞻性研究。治疗中 DBP 较低与非心血管死亡率增加相关,其原因尚不清楚。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bbd/6756261/83dfa7e42f1d/hyp-74-0767-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验