Viktorova Jitka, Stranska-Zachariasova Milena, Fenclova Marie, Vitek Libor, Hajslova Jana, Kren Vladimir, Ruml Tomas
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republice.
Antioxidants (Basel). 2019 Aug 18;8(8):317. doi: 10.3390/antiox8080317.
Numerous in vitro assays are used to characterize the antioxidant properties of natural-based matrices. However, many of them generate contradictory and non-compliant results. In our study, we focused on the characterization of traditionally used biochemical (2,2'-azino-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6 sulfonic acid) (ABTS), Oxygen Radical Absorption Capacity (ORAC), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)) and cellular (CAA) antioxidant tests on a broad set of milk thistle dietary supplements containing silymarin. In addition to 26 commercially available preparations, also the natural silymarin extract available from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA, and a model mixture of pure flavonoid/flavonolignans mimicking the silymarin composition were investigated as control samples. Significant differences in the antioxidant capacity of the supplements were observed. Unlike the DPPH, the results of the ABTS and ORAC methods correlated with the silymarin components determined by U-HPLC-HRMS/MS. The responses in CAA were considerably lower than in other assays. Silymarin exhibited a significantly higher antioxidant capacity than the artificially prepared flavonoid/flavonolignans mixture in all tests, indicating possible presence of other antioxidants of natural origin. The follow-up U-HPLC-HRMS/MS screening revealed the presence of tens of non-silymarin compounds with reported antioxidant activity (not only in the silymarin extract, but also in the milk thistle preparations). The sum of the total phenolics and the sum of the simple phenolics correlated with CAA results more than silymarin.
许多体外试验用于表征天然基质的抗氧化特性。然而,其中许多试验产生了相互矛盾且不一致的结果。在我们的研究中,我们专注于对一系列含有水飞蓟素的水飞蓟膳食补充剂进行传统使用的生化抗氧化试验(2,2'-联氮-双-(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)(ABTS)、氧自由基吸收能力(ORAC)和2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼(DPPH))以及细胞抗氧化试验(CAA)。除了26种市售制剂外,还研究了从美国密苏里州圣路易斯的西格玛奥德里奇公司获得的天然水飞蓟素提取物以及模拟水飞蓟素组成的纯黄酮/黄酮木脂素模型混合物作为对照样品。观察到补充剂的抗氧化能力存在显著差异。与DPPH不同,ABTS和ORAC方法的结果与通过超高效液相色谱-高分辨质谱/质谱测定的水飞蓟素成分相关。CAA中的反应明显低于其他试验。在所有试验中,水飞蓟素表现出比人工制备的黄酮/黄酮木脂素混合物显著更高的抗氧化能力,表明可能存在其他天然来源的抗氧化剂。后续的超高效液相色谱-高分辨质谱/质谱筛选揭示了数十种具有报道的抗氧化活性的非水飞蓟素化合物的存在(不仅在水飞蓟素提取物中,而且在水飞蓟制剂中)。总酚类物质的总和以及简单酚类物质的总和与CAA结果的相关性比水飞蓟素更高。