• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索利益相关者对手术室黑匣子用于患者安全研究实施情况的看法:一项使用理论领域框架的定性研究

Exploring stakeholder perceptions around implementation of the Operating Room Black Box for patient safety research: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.

作者信息

Etherington Nicole, Usama Aya, Patey Andrea M, Trudel Chantal, Przybylak-Brouillard Antoine, Presseau Justin, Grimshaw Jeremy M, Boet Sylvain

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

School of Industrial Design, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Aug 1;8(3):e000686. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000686. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000686
PMID:31428707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6683111/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematically observing clinical performance in the operating room (OR) to support patient safety initiatives faces numerous logistical and methodological challenges. These may be solved by new audio-video recording technologies like the OR Black Box, which is a tool similar to black boxes in aviation. This study aimed to identify barriers and enablers that may influence patients', clinicians' and senior leadership team members' support of the OR Black Box in order to guide its future implementation.

METHODS

Patients, clinicians and senior leadership team members were recruited to participate in semistructured interviews informed by the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to identify factors relevant to planning OR Black Box implementation. Deidentified interview transcripts were analysed in duplicate following a TDF coding structure.

RESULTS

Data saturation was achieved at 15 patients, 17 clinicians and 9 senior leadership team members. Seven domains were relevant for patients, nine for clinicians and four for senior leadership. Knowledge and Beliefs about consequences were barriers and enablers for all three groups. Memory, attention and decision processes and Social influences were enablers for both clinicians and senior leadership. Environmental context and resources, Emotion and Behavioural regulation were found to be barriers and enablers for both clinicians and patients. Social/professional role and identity and Reinforcement were enablers for patients only and Optimism and Intentions were barriers and enablers to clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

While most stakeholders were supportive of the OR Black Box, we identified many key areas that need to be addressed during its implementation. It is critical to ensure all stakeholders have adequate and accurate information about the OR Black Box system and research goals, and that the OR Black Box is positioned as a patient safety initiative for learning from and improving practice.

摘要

背景

在手术室(OR)中系统地观察临床操作以支持患者安全举措面临诸多后勤和方法学挑战。这些挑战可通过新型音频视频记录技术来解决,如手术室黑匣子,它是一种类似于航空领域黑匣子的工具。本研究旨在确定可能影响患者、临床医生和高级领导团队成员对手术室黑匣子支持度的障碍因素和促进因素,以指导其未来的实施。

方法

招募患者、临床医生和高级领导团队成员参与基于理论领域框架(TDF)的半结构化访谈,以确定与手术室黑匣子实施规划相关的因素。按照TDF编码结构对去识别化的访谈记录进行双人分析。

结果

对15名患者、17名临床医生和9名高级领导团队成员进行访谈后实现了数据饱和。七个领域与患者相关,九个与临床医生相关,四个与高级领导相关。对后果的知识和信念对所有三组来说既是障碍因素也是促进因素。记忆、注意力和决策过程以及社会影响对临床医生和高级领导来说都是促进因素。环境背景与资源、情绪和行为调节对临床医生和患者来说既是障碍因素也是促进因素。社会/职业角色与身份以及强化仅对患者是促进因素,而乐观和意图对临床医生来说既是障碍因素也是促进因素。

结论

虽然大多数利益相关者支持手术室黑匣子,但我们确定了其实施过程中许多需要解决的关键领域。确保所有利益相关者拥有关于手术室黑匣子系统和研究目标的充分且准确的信息,以及将手术室黑匣子定位为一项用于学习和改进实践的患者安全举措至关重要。

相似文献

1
Exploring stakeholder perceptions around implementation of the Operating Room Black Box for patient safety research: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.探索利益相关者对手术室黑匣子用于患者安全研究实施情况的看法:一项使用理论领域框架的定性研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Aug 1;8(3):e000686. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000686. eCollection 2019.
2
Implementation of the Operating Room Black Box Research Program at the Ottawa Hospital Through Patient, Clinical, and Organizational Engagement: Case Study.通过患者、临床和组织参与实施渥太华医院手术室黑箱研究计划:案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 16;23(3):e15443. doi: 10.2196/15443.
3
Barriers and enablers to providing evidence-based in-hospital urinary continence care: A cross-sectional survey informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.提供基于证据的住院期间尿失禁护理的障碍和促进因素:基于理论领域框架的横断面调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(15-16):5103-5112. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16776. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
4
Barriers and enablers to physical activity in patients during hospital stay: a scoping review.住院患者身体活动的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 4;10(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01843-x.
5
Identifying barriers and enablers to opt-out hepatitis C virus screening in provincial prisons in Quebec, Canada: A multilevel, multi-theory informed qualitative study with correctional and healthcare professional stakeholders.识别加拿大魁北克省监狱中选择退出丙型肝炎病毒筛查的障碍和促进因素:一项多层面、多理论的定性研究,涉及惩教和医疗保健专业利益相关者。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Nov;109:103837. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103837. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
6
Barriers and enablers to the implementation of multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.多学科团队会议实施的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Oct;30(10):792-803. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011793. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
7
Barriers and enablers for deprescribing benzodiazepine receptor agonists in older adults: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies using the theoretical domains framework.老年人群中苯二氮䓬类受体激动剂逐渐停药的障碍和促进因素:应用理论领域框架对定性和定量研究的系统综述。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jul 8;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01206-7.
8
Health professional and patient views of a novel prognostic test for melanoma: A theoretically informed qualitative study.健康专业人员和患者对一种新型黑色素瘤预后检测的看法:一项基于理论的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0265048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265048. eCollection 2022.
9
Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines.识别新西兰和澳大利亚产前皮质类固醇临床实践指南实施过程中的障碍与促进因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1858-8.
10
Primary care provider perceptions of enablers and barriers to following guideline-recommended laboratory tests to confirm chronic kidney disease: a qualitative descriptive study.初级保健提供者对遵循指南推荐的实验室检查以确诊慢性肾脏病的促进因素和障碍的看法:一项定性描述性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Dec 10;19(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0879-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey.跨专业工作人员对采用“黑匣子”技术和模拟以提高患者安全的看法:一项多方法调查。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2023 Oct 25;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41077-023-00263-2.
2
Healthcare professionals' perception of safety culture and the Operating Room (OR) Black Box technology before clinical implementation: a cross-sectional survey.卫生保健专业人员对安全文化和手术室(OR)黑盒技术的认知在临床实施前:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Dec;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001819.
3
Implementation of an Innovative Technology Called the OR Black Box: A Feasibility Study.实施一项名为 OR 黑盒的创新技术:一项可行性研究。
Surg Innov. 2023 Feb;30(1):64-72. doi: 10.1177/15533506221106258. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
4
Bringing the patient voice into the operating room: engaging patients in surgical safety research with the Operating Room Black Box.让患者的声音进入手术室:通过手术室黑匣子让患者参与手术安全研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jul 23;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00367-5.
5
Facilitating and supporting the engagement of patients, families and caregivers in research: the "Ottawa model" for patient engagement in research.促进和支持患者、家属及照护者参与研究:患者参与研究的“渥太华模式”
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 7;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00350-0.
6
Health professional and patient views of a novel prognostic test for melanoma: A theoretically informed qualitative study.健康专业人员和患者对一种新型黑色素瘤预后检测的看法:一项基于理论的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0265048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265048. eCollection 2022.
7
Staff perceptions of the implementation of a trauma video review program at a level I trauma center.一级创伤中心工作人员对创伤视频回顾项目实施情况的看法。
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Aug 1;5(4):e10714. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10714. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Perceptions of safety culture and recording in the operating room: understanding barriers to video data capture.手术室安全文化和记录的认知:理解视频数据采集的障碍。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):3789-3797. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08695-5. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
9
Implementation of the Operating Room Black Box Research Program at the Ottawa Hospital Through Patient, Clinical, and Organizational Engagement: Case Study.通过患者、临床和组织参与实施渥太华医院手术室黑箱研究计划:案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 16;23(3):e15443. doi: 10.2196/15443.

本文引用的文献

1
System Factors Affecting Intraoperative Risk and Resilience: Applying a Novel Integrated Approach to Study Surgical Performance and Patient Safety.系统因素对手术风险和恢复能力的影响:应用新型综合方法研究手术绩效和患者安全。
Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):1164-1170. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003280.
2
Using Data to Enhance Performance and Improve Quality and Safety in Surgery.利用数据提升手术性能、改善质量与安全。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Oct 1;152(10):972-973. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2888.
3
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.运用行为改变理论领域框架调查实施问题指南。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
4
Aviation and healthcare: a comparative review with implications for patient safety.航空与医疗保健:对患者安全影响的比较性综述。
JRSM Open. 2015 Dec 2;7(1):2054270415616548. doi: 10.1177/2054270415616548. eCollection 2016 Jan.
5
Impact of crisis resource management simulation-based training for interprofessional and interdisciplinary teams: A systematic review.基于危机资源管理模拟训练对跨专业和跨学科团队的影响:一项系统综述。
J Interprof Care. 2015;29(5):433-44. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1017555. Epub 2015 May 14.
6
The use of Lean and Six Sigma methodologies in surgery: a systematic review.精益和六西格玛方法在外科手术中的应用:一项系统评价。
Surgeon. 2015 Apr;13(2):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
7
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准:建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
8
Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review.模拟危机资源管理中的学习迁移与患者结局:一项系统评价
Can J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;61(6):571-82. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0143-8. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
9
Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review.患者参与住院治疗:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):742-50. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002141. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
10
Understanding the Canadian adult CT head rule trial: use of the theoretical domains framework for process evaluation.理解加拿大成人 CT 头部规则试验:使用理论领域框架进行过程评估。
Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 21;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-25.