• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科团队会议实施的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。

Barriers and enablers to the implementation of multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.

机构信息

Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Oct;30(10):792-803. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011793. Epub 2020 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011793
PMID:33247002
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines recommend discussion by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) to review and plan the management of patients for a variety of cancers. However, not all patients diagnosed with cancer are presented at an MDT.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To identify the factors (barriers and enablers) influencing presentation of all patients to, and the perceived value of, MDT meetings in the management of patients with pancreatic cancer and; (2) to identify potential interventions that could overcome modifiable barriers and enhance enablers using the theoretical domains framework (TDF).

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with radiologists, surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists, gastroenterologists, palliative care specialists and nurse specialists based in New South Wales and Victoria, Australia. Interviews were conducted either in person or via videoconferencing. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, deidentified and data were thematically coded according to the 12 domains explored within the TDF. Common belief statements were generated to compare the variation between participant responses.

RESULTS

In total, 29 specialists were interviewed over a 4-month period. Twenty-two themes and 40 belief statements relevant to all the TDF domains were generated. Key enablers influencing MDT practices included a strong organisational focus (), beliefs about the benefits of an MDT discussion (), the use of technology, for example, videoconferencing (), the motivation to provide good quality care () and collegiality (). Barriers included: absence of palliative care representation (), the number of MDT meetings (), the cumulative cost of staff time (), the lack of capacity to discuss all patients within the allotted time () and reduced confidence to participate in discussions ().

CONCLUSIONS

The internal and external organisational structures surrounding MDT meetings ideally need to be strengthened with the development of agreed evidence-based protocols and referral pathways, a focus on resource allocation and capabilities, and a culture that fosters widespread collaboration for all stages of pancreatic cancer.

摘要

背景

循证临床实践指南建议多学科团队(MDT)进行讨论,以审查和规划各种癌症患者的管理。然而,并非所有被诊断患有癌症的患者都在 MDT 中提出。

目的

(1)确定影响所有患者提交 MDT 并对 MDT 会议在胰腺癌管理中的价值的因素(障碍和促进因素);(2)使用理论领域框架(TDF)确定可以克服可修改障碍和增强促进因素的潜在干预措施。

方法

在澳大利亚新南威尔士州和维多利亚州对放射科医生、外科医生、医学和放射肿瘤学家、胃肠病学家、姑息治疗专家和护士专家进行了半结构化访谈。访谈可以亲自进行,也可以通过视频会议进行。所有访谈都进行了录音、逐字记录、去识别处理,并根据 TDF 中探索的 12 个领域进行了主题编码。生成了共同信念陈述,以比较参与者反应之间的差异。

结果

在 4 个月的时间里,共对 29 名专家进行了访谈。共生成了 22 个主题和 40 个与 TDF 所有领域相关的信念陈述。影响 MDT 实践的主要促进因素包括强烈的组织重点()、对 MDT 讨论益处的信念()、使用技术,例如视频会议()、提供高质量护理的动力()和同事关系()。障碍包括:姑息治疗代表缺席()、MDT 会议次数()、员工时间的累计成本()、在规定时间内讨论所有患者的能力不足()和参与讨论的信心降低()。

结论

MDT 会议的内部和外部组织结构需要通过制定商定的基于证据的协议和转诊途径、关注资源分配和能力以及培养广泛合作的文化来加强,以促进胰腺癌各个阶段的广泛合作。

相似文献

1
Barriers and enablers to the implementation of multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.多学科团队会议实施的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Oct;30(10):792-803. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011793. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
2
Barriers and enablers to the implementation of protocol-based imaging in pancreatic cancer: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.基于协议的胰腺癌影像学实施的障碍和促进因素:应用理论领域框架的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 17;15(12):e0243312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243312. eCollection 2020.
3
Bladder-sparing Radiotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Qualitative Study to Identify Barriers and Enablers.肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的膀胱保留放疗:一项识别障碍与促进因素的定性研究
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Dec;29(12):818-826. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
4
Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines.识别新西兰和澳大利亚产前皮质类固醇临床实践指南实施过程中的障碍与促进因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1858-8.
5
What influences allied health clinician participation in research in the public hospital setting: a qualitative theory-informed approach.哪些因素影响公立医院环境下的专职医疗人员参与研究:一种基于理论的定性研究方法。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e036183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036183.
6
Safewards in acute medical/surgical care wards: Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model and Theoretical Domains Framework analysis.急危重症医学/外科病房的安全保障:能力、机会、动机和行为模型以及理论领域框架分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104719. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104719. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
7
8
Understanding the clinical management of obstructive sleep apnoea in tetraplegia: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.了解四肢瘫痪患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的临床管理:一项运用理论领域框架的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4197-8.
9
Barriers and enablers to the delivery of psychological care in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.中国2型糖尿病患者管理中心理护理实施的障碍与促进因素:一项运用理论域框架的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 29;16:106. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1358-x.
10
Barriers and enablers to the use of venous leg ulcer clinical practice guidelines in Australian primary care: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.静脉溃疡临床实践指南在澳大利亚初级保健中使用的障碍和促进因素:应用理论领域框架的定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Mar;103:103503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103503. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
To treat or not to treat? Oncologists' perceptions and experiences regarding overtreatment in end stage cancer patients.治疗还是不治疗?肿瘤学家对晚期癌症患者过度治疗的看法与经历。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 10;12:1607479. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1607479. eCollection 2025.
2
Endometriosis MDC: role of the radiologist.子宫内膜异位症多学科诊疗模式:放射科医生的作用
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04920-0.
3
Do Surgical Oncology Multidisciplinary Team Meetings Make a Difference?外科肿瘤多学科团队会议有作用吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):1222-1231. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16471-7. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
4
Participation in Multidisciplinary Teams Among Healthcare Professionals: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Tertiary Public Hospitals in China.中国三级公立医院医护人员参与多学科团队情况:一项离散选择实验
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Sep 7;17:4397-4409. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S473675. eCollection 2024.
5
The Initial Journey of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (PaCTO Project): A Nationwide Survey among Portuguese Specialist Physicians.转移性胰腺癌患者的初始旅程(PaCTO项目):一项针对葡萄牙专科医生的全国性调查。
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 5;31(4):262-272. doi: 10.1159/000533178. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Registry-derived stage (RD-Stage) for capturing stage at diagnosis for pancreatic carcinoma in Australia.澳大利亚胰腺癌诊断时的登记衍生分期(RD-Stage)。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0294443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294443. eCollection 2024.
7
Patients' recovery of mobility and return to original residence after hip fracture are associated with multiple modifiable components of hospital service organisation: the REDUCE record-linkage cohort study in England and Wales.患者髋关节骨折后恢复活动能力和返回原籍与医院服务组织的多个可改变部分相关:英格兰和威尔士的 REDUCE 记录链接队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jul 27;23(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04038-2.
8
Pros and cons of streamlining and use of computerised clinical decision support systems to future-proof oncological multidisciplinary team meetings.简化流程及使用计算机化临床决策支持系统对肿瘤多学科团队会议未来发展的利弊
Front Oncol. 2023 May 18;13:1178165. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1178165. eCollection 2023.
9
Multidisciplinary team diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer: Current landscape and future prospects.胰腺癌的多学科团队诊断与治疗:现状与未来展望
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 15;13:1077605. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1077605. eCollection 2023.
10
How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England.患者在多学科团队环境下如何做出决策:对英格兰北部四个头颈部癌症中心的民族志研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 24;12(8):e061654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061654.