Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Apr;140(4):465-472. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03258-9. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
Although degenerative osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint is a common finding on technical investigations, not every patient experiences pain or function loss. The difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients is currently not elucidated. Therefore, we want to investigate the acromioclavicular relationship in normal, asymptomatic, and symptomatic degenerated ACJ.
84 normal ACJ, 39 asymptomatic degenerated ACJ, and 30 symptomatic degenerated ACJ were 3D reconstructed. The morphological dimensions and the relationship of the acromion and distal clavicle were measured using computational software. The reproducibility of this technique was evaluated using inter- and intra-observer reliability.
The mean anteroposterior and superoinferior distance of both the clavicle and acromion was significantly larger in asymptomatic and symptomatic degenerative ACJ compared to the normal ACJ (p < 0.001). In symptomatic osteoarthritic ACJ, both the anterior and posterior borders of the acromion were significantly more anterior to the borders of the clavicle than in the normal group and asymptomatic group (p < 0.001). Subsequent ROC curve analysis resulted in a sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 88.6% for anterior subluxation of the ACJ. This technique showed an excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability.
In patients with degenerative ACJ, both the distal clavicle and acromion are enlarged. In asymptomatic patients, the AC relationship is the same as in normal patients, in contrast, in patients with symptomatic degenerative ACJ, the acromion is subluxated anteriorly compared to the clavicle.
尽管肩锁关节的退变性骨关节炎在技术检查中是一种常见的发现,但并非每个患者都有疼痛或功能丧失。目前尚不清楚有症状和无症状患者之间的区别。因此,我们想研究正常、无症状和有症状退行性 ACJ 中的肩锁关节关系。
对 84 例正常肩锁关节、39 例无症状退行性肩锁关节和 30 例有症状退行性肩锁关节进行了 3D 重建。使用计算软件测量了肩锁关节的形态尺寸和肩峰与锁骨远端的关系。通过观察者内和观察者间的可靠性评估来评估该技术的重现性。
与正常肩锁关节相比,无症状和有症状退行性肩锁关节的锁骨和肩峰的前后和上下距离均明显更大(p<0.001)。在有症状的骨关节炎肩锁关节中,肩峰的前、后缘均明显比正常组和无症状组更靠前于锁骨(p<0.001)。随后的 ROC 曲线分析得出,肩锁关节前侧半脱位的敏感性为 86.7%,特异性为 88.6%。该技术具有极好的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。
在退行性肩锁关节患者中,锁骨远端和肩峰均增大。在无症状患者中,AC 关系与正常患者相同,而在有症状退行性肩锁关节患者中,肩峰相对于锁骨向前半脱位。