• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恒定偏差:当我们“填补”未被注意或遗忘的刺激的“空白”时。

Constancy bias: When we "fill in the blanks" of unattended or forgotten stimuli.

作者信息

Duncan Dock, Van der Stigchel Stefan

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):891-900. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01838-w.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-019-01838-w
PMID:31429043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7246242/
Abstract

Our ability to form predictions about the behavior of objects outside our focus of attention and to recognize when those expectations have been violated is critical to our survival. One principle that greatly influences our beliefs about unattended stimuli is that of constancy, or the tendency to assume objects outside our attention have remained constant, and the next time we attend to them they will be unchanged. Although this phenomenon is familiar from research on inattentional blindness, it is currently unclear when constancy is assumed and what conditions are adequate to convince us that unattended stimuli have likely undergone a change while outside of our attentional spotlight. Using a simple change-detection task, we sought to show that unattended stimuli are strongly predisposed to be perceived as unchanging when presented on constant, unchanging backgrounds; however, when stimuli were presented with significant incidental visual activity, participants were no longer biased towards change rejection. We found that participants were far more likely to report that a change had occurred if target presentation was accompanied by salient, incidental visual activity. We take these results to indicate that when an object is not represented in working memory, we use environmental conditions to judge whether or not these items are likely to have undergone a change or remained constant.

摘要

我们对注意力焦点之外的物体行为进行预测以及识别这些预期何时被违背的能力对我们的生存至关重要。一个极大影响我们对未被注意刺激物信念的原则是恒常性原则,即倾向于假定我们注意力之外的物体保持不变,并且下次我们关注它们时它们也不会改变。尽管这种现象在无意视盲的研究中很常见,但目前尚不清楚何时会假定恒常性,以及何种条件足以使我们相信未被注意的刺激物在处于我们注意力聚光灯之外时可能已经发生了变化。通过一个简单的变化检测任务,我们试图表明,当未被注意的刺激物呈现于恒定、不变的背景上时,它们极有可能被感知为未发生变化;然而,当刺激物伴随着显著的附带视觉活动呈现时,参与者不再倾向于拒绝变化。我们发现,如果目标呈现伴随着显著的附带视觉活动,参与者报告发生了变化的可能性要大得多。我们认为这些结果表明,当一个物体未在工作记忆中被表征时,我们利用环境条件来判断这些物体是否可能已经发生了变化或保持不变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6761/7246242/4bc7e15246ae/13414_2019_1838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6761/7246242/c34e8f6a4a21/13414_2019_1838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6761/7246242/4bc7e15246ae/13414_2019_1838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6761/7246242/c34e8f6a4a21/13414_2019_1838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6761/7246242/4bc7e15246ae/13414_2019_1838_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Constancy bias: When we "fill in the blanks" of unattended or forgotten stimuli.恒定偏差:当我们“填补”未被注意或遗忘的刺激的“空白”时。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):891-900. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01838-w.
2
Attentional inhibition mediates inattentional blindness.注意抑制介导了非注意盲视。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Jun;19(2):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
3
Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention.高工作记忆负荷下的非注意盲视释放:阐明工作记忆与选择性注意之间的关系。
Cognition. 2011 Dec;121(3):400-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.016. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
4
The role of unattended distractors in sustained inattentional blindness.未被注意的干扰物在持续性注意盲视中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2008 Jan;72(1):39-48. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0072-4. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
5
Distance is relative: Inattentional blindness critically depends on the breadth of the attentional focus.距离是相对的:不注意盲视关键取决于注意力焦点的宽度。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Feb;78:102878. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102878. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
6
The Influence of Attention Set, Working Memory Capacity, and Expectations on Inattentional Blindness.注意定势、工作记忆容量和预期对无意视盲的影响。
Perception. 2016 Apr;45(4):386-99. doi: 10.1177/0301006615614465. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
7
How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness.如何不被看见:相似性和选择性忽略对持续性注意盲视的影响
Psychol Sci. 2001 Jan;12(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00303.
8
Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events.我们身边的大猩猩:对动态事件的持续性注意力盲视
Perception. 1999;28(9):1059-74. doi: 10.1068/p281059.
9
The relationship between sustained inattentional blindness and working memory capacity.持续性注意力不集中盲视与工作记忆容量之间的关系。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Apr;78(3):808-17. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-1027-x.
10
The visible gorilla: Unexpected fast-not physically salient-Objects are noticeable.可见的大猩猩:意想不到的快速——不是物理上显著的——物体是显而易见的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 30;120(22):e2214930120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214930120. Epub 2023 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Major issues in the study of visual search: Part 2 of "40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman".视觉搜索研究中的主要问题:《特征整合40年:纪念安妮·特雷斯曼特刊》第二部分
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):383-393. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02022-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of relational triggers in event perception.关系触发因素在事件感知中的作用。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:14-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.030. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
2
Feature binding and attention in working memory: a resolution of previous contradictory findings.工作记忆中的特征绑定与注意力:对先前矛盾研究结果的一种解析
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(12):2369-83. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.687384. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
3
Rethinking the role of top-down attention in vision: effects attributable to a lossy representation in peripheral vision.
重新思考自上而下的注意力在视觉中的作用:外周视觉中有损表征所产生的影响。
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 6;3:13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00013. eCollection 2012.
4
Change blindness.变化盲视。
Trends Cogn Sci. 1997 Oct;1(7):261-7. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01080-2.
5
The briefest of glances: the time course of natural scene understanding.最短暂的一瞥:自然场景理解的时间进程。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):464-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02316.x.
6
Implicit perception and level of processing in object-substitution masking.客体替代掩蔽中的内隐知觉与加工水平
Psychol Sci. 2009 May;20(5):560-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02328.x. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
7
Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy.使用 PsychoPy 生成神经科学刺激。
Front Neuroinform. 2009 Jan 15;2:10. doi: 10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008. eCollection 2008.
8
Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity.视觉工作记忆表征的项目数量固定,与复杂性无关。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):622-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01949.x.
9
Location and binding in visual working memory.视觉工作记忆中的位置与绑定
Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1704-19. doi: 10.3758/bf03195932.
10
How the deployment of attention determines what we see.注意力的分配如何决定我们所看到的东西。
Vis cogn. 2006 Aug 1;14(4-8):411-443. doi: 10.1080/13506280500195250.