Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Faculty of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz; Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg; Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Faculty of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz; Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Faculty of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz; Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Faculty of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Jun 28;116(26):453-458. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0453.
The stepped-wedge design (SWD) of clinical trials has become very popular in recent years, particularly in health services research. Typically, study participants are randomly allotted in clusters to the different treatment options.
The basic principles of the stepped wedge design and related statistical techniques are described here on the basis of pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and in the CIS statistical literature database.
In a typical SWD trial, the intervention is begun at a time point that varies from cluster to cluster. Until this time point is reached, all participants in the cluster belong to the control arm of the trial. Once the intervention is begun, it is continued with- out change until the end of the trial period. The starting time for the intervention in each cluster is determined by randomization. At the first time point of measurement, no intervention has yet begun in any cluster; at the last one, the intervention is in prog- ress in all clusters. The treatment effect can be optimally assessed under the assumption of an identical correlation at all time points. A method is available to calculate the power and the number of clusters that would be necessary in order to achieve statistical significance by the appropriate type of significance test. All of the statistical techniques presented here are based on the assumptions of a normal distribution of cluster means and of a constant intervention effect across all time points of measure- ment.
The necessary statistical tools for the planning and evaluation of SWD trials now stand at our disposal. Such trials nevertheless are subject to major risks, as valid results can be obtained only if the far-reaching assumptions of the model are, in fact, justified.
近年来,阶梯式楔形设计(SWD)临床试验在健康服务研究中变得非常流行。通常,研究参与者会被随机分配到不同的治疗组。
本文基于在 PubMed 和 CIS 统计文献数据库中选择搜索检索到的相关出版物,介绍了阶梯式楔形设计及相关统计技术的基本原理。
在典型的 SWD 试验中,干预措施从一个时间点开始,每个时间点的时间点各不相同。在到达该时间点之前,该组的所有参与者都属于试验的对照组。一旦开始干预,就会继续进行,直到试验结束。每个组的干预起始时间由随机化决定。在第一次测量时间点,任何组都没有开始干预;在最后一次测量时间点,所有组都在进行干预。在所有时间点都存在相同相关性的假设下,可以最佳评估治疗效果。有一种方法可以计算出所需的功效和组的数量,以便通过适当的显著性检验达到统计学意义。这里介绍的所有统计技术都是基于组平均值正态分布和所有测量时间点干预效果不变的假设。
现在我们可以使用必要的统计工具来规划和评估 SWD 试验。然而,这些试验存在很大的风险,只有在模型的广泛假设实际上得到证明的情况下,才能得到有效的结果。