Suppr超能文献

培非格司亭体注射笔故障导致的发热性中性粒细胞减少症住院治疗与单次注射培非格司亭和参照及生物类似物注射用粒细胞集落刺激因子每日注射相比:肺癌和非霍奇金淋巴瘤的美国成本模拟。

Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

机构信息

Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.

University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2020 Jan;23(1):28-36. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1658591. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

Abstract

Guidelines recommend febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis following myelotoxic chemotherapy with either daily injections of filgrastim (Neupogen) or biosimilar filgrastim-sndz (Zarzio/Zarxio), single-injection pegfilgrastim (Neulasta), or pegfilgrastim administered through an on-body injector (PEG-OBI; Neulasta Onpro). PEG-OBI failure rates up to 6.9% have been reported, putting patients at incremental risk for FN and FN-related hospitalization. Our objective was to estimate, from a US payer perspective, the incremental costs of FN hospitalizations and the total incremental costs associated with PEG-OBI prophylaxis at varying device failure rates over assured FN prophylaxis with daily injections of filgrastim or filgrastim-sndz or a single injection of pegfilgrastim. Cost simulations comparing prophylaxis with PEG-OBI at failure rates of 1-10% versus assured prophylaxis in cycle 1 of chemotherapy were performed for panels of 10,000 patients with lung cancer treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (1 analysis) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) treated with CHOP or CNOP (2 analyses). Daily injection scenarios were 4.3, 5, and 11 injections for lung cancer and 5, 6.5, and 11 for NHL. The analyses are from the US payer perspective. For lung cancer, the total incremental cost of PEG-OBI prophylaxis at varying failure rates and durations ranged from $6,691,969‒$31,765,299 over filgrastim and $18,901,969‒$36,538,299 over filgrastim-sndz. For NHL, in scenario 1, the total incremental costs ranged from $6,794,984‒$30,361,345 over filgrastim and $19,004,984‒$35,911,345 over filgrastim-sndz; in scenario 2, the incremental costs ranged from $7,003,657‒$32,448,067 over filgrastim and $19,213,657‒$37,998,067 over filgrastim-sndz. In this simulation, the incremental costs of FN-related hospitalization due to PEG-OBI failure in cycle 1 compared to assured prophylaxis with reference pegfilgrastim, reference filgrastim, and biosimilar filgrastim-sndz varied depending upon the PEG-OBI failure rate and the alternative G-CSF prophylaxis option. Biosimilar filgrastim-sndz offers the greatest cost-efficiency.

摘要

指南建议在使用骨髓抑制性化疗后进行发热性中性粒细胞减少症 (FN) 预防,包括每日注射非格司亭(Neupogen)或生物类似药非格司亭-sndz(Zarzio/Zarxio)、单次注射培非格司亭(Neulasta)或通过体部植入式注射装置(PEG-OBI;Neulasta Onpro)给予培非格司亭。据报道,PEG-OBI 的失败率高达 6.9%,这使患者面临 FN 风险增加和 FN 相关住院治疗的风险增加。我们的目标是从美国支付方的角度估算,在不同的装置失败率下,与使用每日注射非格司亭或非格司亭-sndz 或单次注射培非格司亭的 FN 预防相比,因 FN 住院治疗而导致的增量成本以及与 PEG-OBI 预防相关的总增量成本。对于使用环磷酰胺、多柔比星和依托泊苷治疗的肺癌(1 项分析)或使用 CHOP 或 CNOP 治疗的非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)(2 项分析)患者,针对 PEG-OBI 在 1-10%的失败率与周期 1 化疗中确保预防的情况,对 10000 名患者进行了预防使用 PEG-OBI 与其他方案的成本模拟。肺癌的每日注射方案为 4.3、5 和 11 次,而 NHL 为 5、6.5 和 11 次。分析结果基于美国支付方的观点。对于肺癌,在不同的失败率和持续时间下,PEG-OBI 预防的总增量成本范围为相对于非格司亭为 6691969 美元至 31765299 美元,相对于非格司亭-sndz 为 18901969 美元至 36538299 美元。对于 NHL,在方案 1 中,相对于非格司亭,总增量成本范围为 6794984 美元至 30361345 美元,相对于非格司亭-sndz 为 19004984 美元至 35911345 美元;在方案 2 中,相对于非格司亭,增量成本范围为 7003657 美元至 32448067 美元,相对于非格司亭-sndz 为 19213657 美元至 37998067 美元。在这项模拟研究中,与参考培非格司亭、参考非格司亭和生物类似药非格司亭-sndz 相比,由于 PEG-OBI 在第 1 周期内失败导致 FN 相关住院治疗的增量成本取决于 PEG-OBI 的失败率和替代 G-CSF 预防方案。生物类似药非格司亭-sndz 具有最高的成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验