• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

化疗后发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FENCE)评分预测淋巴瘤患者首轮化疗期间粒细胞集落刺激因子突破性发热性中性粒细胞减少症的可靠性:一项前瞻性观察研究。

The reliability of FEbrile Neutropenia after ChEmotherapy (FENCE) scores in predicting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor breakthrough febrile neutropenia among patients with lymphoma undergoing first-cycle chemotherapy: A prospective observational study.

作者信息

Thungthong Pravinwan, Chamnanchanunt Supat, Suwanban Tawatchai, Nakhahes Chajchawan, Iam-Arunthai Kunapa, Akrawikrai Tananchai, Bunworasate Udomsak, Rojnuckarin Ponlapat

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 13;10:1122282. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1122282. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1122282
PMID:36993799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10040561/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A tool for estimating risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) after chemotherapy, namely the FEbrile Neutropenia after ChEmotherapy (FENCE) score, has been developed but has not been widely validated. This study aimed to validate the FENCE score as a tool for predicting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) breakthrough FN among patients with lymphoma who underwent chemotherapy.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of treatment-naive adult patients with lymphoma who underwent their first cycle of chemotherapy between 2020 and 2021. The patients were followed up until the next cycle of chemotherapy to identify any infection events.

RESULTS

Among the 135 patients with lymphoma, 62 (50%) were men. In a comparison of the value of each FENCE parameter for predicting G-CSF breakthrough infection, the parameter of advanced-stage disease showed high sensitivity of 92.8%, and receipt of platinum chemotherapy showed high specificity of 95.33%. With a FENCE score of 12 as a cutoff for low risk, analysis across all patients with lymphoma resulted in a high AUROCC of 0.63 (95% CI = 0.5-0.74%; = 0.059), and analysis across only patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) resulted in an AUROCC of 0.65 (95% CI = 0.51-0.79%; = 0.046). With a cutoff point of 12, FENCE score can predict breakthrough infection events at 30.0% (95% CI = 17.8-47.4%).

CONCLUSION

This study divided patients with lymphoma into risk groups according to FENCE score, showing that this instrument has discriminatory ability in predicting FN events, these being more likely to occur in patients in the intermediate- and high-risk groups. Multicenter studies are needed to validate this clinical risk score.

摘要

背景

一种用于评估化疗后发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)风险的工具,即化疗后发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FENCE)评分已被开发出来,但尚未得到广泛验证。本研究旨在验证FENCE评分作为预测接受化疗的淋巴瘤患者中粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)突破性FN的工具。

方法

这是一项对2020年至2021年间接受首个化疗周期的初治成年淋巴瘤患者的前瞻性观察性研究。对患者进行随访直至下一个化疗周期,以确定任何感染事件。

结果

在135例淋巴瘤患者中,62例(50%)为男性。在比较每个FENCE参数预测G-CSF突破性感染的价值时,晚期疾病参数显示出92.8%的高敏感性,接受铂类化疗显示出95.33%的高特异性。以FENCE评分为12作为低风险的临界值,对所有淋巴瘤患者进行分析得出的曲线下面积(AUROCC)为0.63(95%可信区间=0.5-0.74%;P=0.059),仅对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者进行分析得出的AUROCC为0.65(95%可信区间=0.51-0.79%;P=0.046)。以12为临界值时,FENCE评分可预测30.0%(95%可信区间=17.8-47.4%)的突破性感染事件。

结论

本研究根据FENCE评分将淋巴瘤患者分为风险组,表明该工具在预测FN事件方面具有鉴别能力,这些事件更有可能发生在中高风险组的患者中。需要进行多中心研究来验证这一临床风险评分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbb3/10040561/ec1046fd6650/fmed-10-1122282-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbb3/10040561/441348582b49/fmed-10-1122282-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbb3/10040561/4ff05bc296f3/fmed-10-1122282-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbb3/10040561/ec1046fd6650/fmed-10-1122282-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbb3/10040561/441348582b49/fmed-10-1122282-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbb3/10040561/4ff05bc296f3/fmed-10-1122282-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbb3/10040561/ec1046fd6650/fmed-10-1122282-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The reliability of FEbrile Neutropenia after ChEmotherapy (FENCE) scores in predicting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor breakthrough febrile neutropenia among patients with lymphoma undergoing first-cycle chemotherapy: A prospective observational study.化疗后发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FENCE)评分预测淋巴瘤患者首轮化疗期间粒细胞集落刺激因子突破性发热性中性粒细胞减少症的可靠性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 13;10:1122282. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1122282. eCollection 2023.
2
Validation of the FENCE Risk Groups for Prediction of Febrile Neutropenia With First-Cycle Chemotherapy.FENCE 风险组对预测首次化疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症的验证。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac038.
3
Validation of the FENCE score for prediction of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy cycles 2-6.FENCE评分对化疗第2 - 6周期发热性中性粒细胞减少症预测的验证
Discov Oncol. 2022 Oct 17;13(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s12672-022-00575-1.
4
Development and validation of a cycle-specific risk score for febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy cycles 2-6 in patients with solid cancers: The FENCE score.实体瘤患者化疗周期 2-6 期间发热性中性粒细胞减少症的周期特异性风险评分的制定和验证:FENCE 评分。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Jan 15;146(2):321-328. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32249. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Febrile Neutropenia After Chemotherapy in Patients With Cancer: The FENCE Score.癌症患者化疗后发热性中性粒细胞减少风险评分的开发与验证:FENCE评分
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Nov 29;2(4):pky053. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky053. eCollection 2018 Oct.
6
Impact of age group on febrile neutropenia risk assessment and management in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP regimens.年龄组对接受 R-CHOP 方案治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症风险评估和管理的影响。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2012 Oct;12(5):297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2012.06.004.
7
Predictive Parameters of Febrile Neutropenia and Clinical Significance of G-CSF Receptor Signaling Pathway in the Development of Neutropenia during R-CHOP Chemotherapy with Prophylactic Pegfilgrastim in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.预测 R-CHOP 化疗中预防性使用培非格司亭导致中性粒细胞减少的发热性中性粒细胞减少症的参数和 G-CSF 受体信号通路的临床意义。弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者。
Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Oct;54(4):1256-1267. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.944. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
8
Febrile neutropenia (FN) and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study.发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)和培格非格司亭预防在接受高(> 20%)FN 风险化疗的乳腺癌和非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中的应用:来自一项前瞻性观察性研究的结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Apr;27(4):1449-1457. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4473-x. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
9
G-CSF use in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) as observed in clinical practice in Italy.在意大利临床实践中观察到的接受非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)一线化疗的患者使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的情况。
Med Oncol. 2016 Dec;33(12):139. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0850-9. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
10
[Application of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a prospective, multicenter, open-label clinical trial].聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子预防淋巴瘤患者化疗所致中性粒细胞减少症的应用:一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签的临床试验
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 14;38(10):825-830. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.10.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical prediction models for febrile neutropenia and its outcomes: a systematic review.发热性中性粒细胞减少症及其预后的临床预测模型:一项系统评价
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 4;33(7):537. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09562-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Current state and future opportunities in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的现状与未来机遇
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7067-7077. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07103-5.
2
Validation of the FENCE Risk Groups for Prediction of Febrile Neutropenia With First-Cycle Chemotherapy.FENCE 风险组对预测首次化疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症的验证。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac038.
3
Clinical Outcomes, Treatment Toxicity, and Health Care Utilization in Older Adults with Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
老年侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的临床结局、治疗毒性和医疗保健利用情况。
Oncologist. 2021 Nov;26(11):965-973. doi: 10.1002/onco.13915. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Continuous Intravenous Administration of Granulocyte-Colony-Stimulating Factors-A Breakthrough in the Treatment of Cancer Patients with Febrile Neutropenia.连续静脉注射粒细胞集落刺激因子——癌症发热性中性粒细胞减少症治疗的突破。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 30;57(7):675. doi: 10.3390/medicina57070675.
5
Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice.美国临床实践中,未接受粒细胞集落刺激因子预防的转移性癌症患者化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症的风险。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Apr;29(4):2179-2186. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05715-3. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
6
Accuracy of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) scores for predicting serious complications in adult patients with febrile neutropenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.多国支持性护理癌症协会 (MASCC) 和中性粒细胞减少性发热临床指数 (CISNE) 评分预测成人发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者严重并发症的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 May;149:102922. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102922. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Febrile Neutropenia in Acute Leukemia. Epidemiology, Etiology, Pathophysiology and Treatment.急性白血病中的发热性中性粒细胞减少症。流行病学、病因学、病理生理学与治疗
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 1;12(1):e2020009. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2020.009. eCollection 2020.
8
Prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia with colony-stimulating factors: the first 25 years.集落刺激因子预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症:25 年历程。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Mar;36(3):483-495. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1703665. Epub 2019 Dec 29.
9
Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.培非格司亭体注射笔故障导致的发热性中性粒细胞减少症住院治疗与单次注射培非格司亭和参照及生物类似物注射用粒细胞集落刺激因子每日注射相比:肺癌和非霍奇金淋巴瘤的美国成本模拟。
J Med Econ. 2020 Jan;23(1):28-36. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1658591. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
10
Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Febrile Neutropenia After Chemotherapy in Patients With Cancer: The FENCE Score.癌症患者化疗后发热性中性粒细胞减少风险评分的开发与验证:FENCE评分
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Nov 29;2(4):pky053. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky053. eCollection 2018 Oct.