Yayıcı Köken Özlem, Kara Cengiz, Can Yılmaz Gülay, Aydın Hasan Murat
University of Health Sciences Turkey, Dr. Sami Ulus Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Pediatric Neurology, Ankara, Turkey
İstinye University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, İstanbul, Turkey
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2020 Mar 19;12(1):55-62. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2019.2019.0048. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
To determine the prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to compare the widely accepted and used diagnostic criteria for MetS established by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), World Health Organisation (WHO) and National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATPIII).
We conducted a descriptive, cross sectional study including T1D patients between 8-18 years of age. The three sets of criteria were used to determine the prevalence of MetS and findings compared. Risk factors related to MetS were extracted from hospital records.
The study included 200 patients with T1D (52% boys). Of these, 18% (n=36) were overweight/obese (body mass index percentile ≥85%). MetS prevalence was 10.5%, 8.5% and 13.5% according to IDF, WHO and NCEP criteria, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, family history of T1D and T2D, pubertal stage, duration of diabetes, hemoglobin A1c levels and daily insulin doses between patients with or without MetS. In the overweight or obese T1D patients, the prevalence of MetS was 44.4%, 38.8% and 44.4% according to IDF, WHO and NCEP-ATPIII criteria, respectively.
Obesity prevalence in the T1D cohort was similar to that of the healthy population of the same age. Prevalence of MetS was higher in children and adolescents with T1D compared to the obese population in Turkey. The WHO criteria include microvascular complications which are rare in childhood and the NCEP criteria do not include a primary criterion while diagnosing non-obese patients according to waist circumference as MetS because the existence of diabetes is considered as a direct criterion. Our study suggests that IDF criteria which allows the diagnosis of MetS with obesity and have accepted criteria for the childhood are more suitable for the diagnosis of MetS in children and adolescents with T1D.
确定1型糖尿病(T1D)儿童和青少年中肥胖及代谢综合征(MetS)的患病率,并比较国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)、世界卫生组织(WHO)和美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗小组第三次报告(NCEP-ATPIII)制定的被广泛接受和使用的MetS诊断标准。
我们开展了一项描述性横断面研究,纳入8至18岁的T1D患者。使用这三套标准来确定MetS的患病率并比较结果。从医院记录中提取与MetS相关的危险因素。
该研究纳入了200例T1D患者(52%为男孩)。其中,18%(n = 36)超重/肥胖(体重指数百分位数≥85%)。根据IDF、WHO和NCEP标准,MetS的患病率分别为10.5%、8.5%和13.5%。有或无MetS的患者在年龄、性别、T1D和2型糖尿病(T2D)家族史、青春期阶段、糖尿病病程、糖化血红蛋白水平和每日胰岛素剂量方面无统计学显著差异。在超重或肥胖的T1D患者中,根据IDF、WHO和NCEP-ATPIII标准,MetS的患病率分别为44.4%、38.8%和44.4%。
T1D队列中的肥胖患病率与同年龄健康人群相似。与土耳其肥胖人群相比,T1D儿童和青少年中MetS的患病率更高。WHO标准纳入了儿童期罕见的微血管并发症,而NCEP标准在根据腰围诊断非肥胖患者为MetS时不包括主要标准,因为糖尿病的存在被视为直接标准。我们的研究表明,IDF标准允许诊断伴有肥胖的MetS且有适用于儿童期的公认标准,更适合用于诊断T1D儿童和青少年中的MetS。