Takei Shoichiro, Miyagi Masayuki, Saito Wataru, Imura Takayuki, Inoue Gen, Nakazawa Toshiyuki, Shirasawa Eiki, Uchida Kentaro, Akazawa Tsutomu, Takahira Naonobu, Takaso Masashi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018 Apr 27;2(4):294-298. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2017-0093. eCollection 2018 Oct 26.
Patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) usually have progressive scoliosis. Although fusion of the sacrum or pelvis has been recommended for correcting pelvic obliquity (PO), the procedure is invasive. This study determined as to whether performing instrumentation to the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) is safe and effective for scoliosis in patients with SMA.
Twelve patients with SMA underwent posterior spinal fusion and stopping instrumentation at the L5 level. We evaluated age at surgery, the duration of surgery, blood loss, complications, preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles, and PO.
The mean age at surgery was 11.4 years; the mean duration of surgery was 319 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 1170 mL. The Cobb angle improved from 97.3° to 39.1° at 1 month postoperatively (correction rate, 60.9%) and to 42.3° at the final follow-up. PO was corrected from 27.8° to 13.1° at 1 month postoperatively (correction rate, 51.7%) and to 19.8° at the final follow-up. No complications were reported. All patients showed improvement in low back pain, with reduced difficulty while sitting. However, >10% correction loss of PO was observed in 6 patients with high preoperative PO.
The correction rate of scoliosis in SMA patients with posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation to the L5 level was acceptable, and no complications occurred. Scoliosis associated with SMA was more rigid and severer than scoliosis associated with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Correction rates of the Cobb angle and PO in SMA patients with instrumentation to L5 were similar to those in SMA patients with instrumentation to the sacrum or pelvis. Correction loss of PO was greater in patients with high preoperative PO than in those with low preoperative PO. Instrumentation and fusion to L5 for scoliosis in patients with SMA seems safe and effective, except in cases of high preoperative PO.
脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)患者通常会出现进行性脊柱侧弯。尽管有人建议通过骶骨或骨盆融合术来纠正骨盆倾斜(PO),但该手术具有侵入性。本研究旨在确定对第五腰椎(L5)进行器械固定对SMA患者的脊柱侧弯是否安全有效。
12例SMA患者接受了后路脊柱融合术,并在L5水平停止器械固定。我们评估了手术年龄、手术时长、失血量、并发症、术前和术后的Cobb角以及PO。
手术平均年龄为11.4岁;平均手术时长为319分钟,平均失血量为1170毫升。术后1个月时,Cobb角从97.3°改善至39.1°(矫正率60.9%),末次随访时为42.3°。术后1个月时,PO从27.8°矫正至13.1°(矫正率51.7%),末次随访时为19.8°。未报告并发症。所有患者的下背痛均有改善,坐位困难减轻。然而,6例术前PO较高的患者出现了>10%的PO矫正丢失。
L5水平后路脊柱融合及器械固定的SMA患者脊柱侧弯矫正率可接受,且未发生并发症。与SMA相关的脊柱侧弯比与杜氏肌营养不良症相关的脊柱侧弯更僵硬、更严重。L5器械固定的SMA患者的Cobb角和PO矫正率与骶骨或骨盆器械固定的SMA患者相似。术前PO较高的患者PO矫正丢失比术前PO较低的患者更大。对SMA患者的脊柱侧弯进行L5器械固定和融合似乎是安全有效的,但术前PO较高的情况除外。