Hori Yusuke, Takahashi Shinji, Terai Hidetomi, Hoshino Masatoshi, Toyoda Hiromitsu, Suzuki Akinobu, Hayashi Kazunori, Tamai Koji, Ohyama Shoichiro, Nakamura Hiroaki
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018 Aug 25;3(2):151-156. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0025. eCollection 2019 Apr 27.
Despite ongoing improvements in both dialysis and surgical techniques, spinal surgery in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) is a challenge to surgeons because of the high mortality rate. However, no previous studies have examined clinical outcomes after lumbar surgery in HD patients. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes and complication rates after lumbar spinal surgery in patients with or without hemodialysis.
This retrospective, matched cohort study was conducted to compare surgical outcomes between HD vs non-HD patients who underwent lumbar surgery at our hospital. Controls were individually matched to cases at a ratio of 1:2. Clinical outcomes, complications, and mortality rates were compared between the two groups.
Twenty-nine patients in the HD group and 57 in the non-HD group were included in the current study. Five patients in the HD group died during the follow-up period, whereas no patients died in the non-HD group (mortality rate, 17.2% vs. 0%, = 0.003). Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were significantly less improved in the HD group than in the non-HD group (11.9 vs. 14.2 preoperatively, = 0.001; 19.9 vs. 25.1 at final follow-up, < 0.001). Five patients underwent repeat surgery in the HD group, which was significantly higher than the non-HD group (17.2% vs. 3.5%, = 0.041).
The current study indicates that patients undergoing HD had poor outcomes after lumbar spinal surgery. Moreover, 5 of 29 patients died within a mean 2.4-years follow-up. The indications for lumbar spine surgery in HD patients must be carefully considered because of poor surgical outcomes and high mortality rate.
尽管透析技术和外科手术技术不断改进,但对于接受血液透析(HD)的患者而言,脊柱手术因其高死亡率仍是外科医生面临的一项挑战。然而,此前尚无研究探讨HD患者腰椎手术后的临床结局。本研究的目的是比较接受或未接受血液透析的患者腰椎手术后的临床结局和并发症发生率。
本研究为回顾性配对队列研究,旨在比较在我院接受腰椎手术的HD患者与非HD患者的手术结局。对照组与病例组按1:2的比例进行个体匹配。比较两组的临床结局、并发症和死亡率。
本研究纳入了HD组的29例患者和非HD组的57例患者。HD组有5例患者在随访期间死亡,而非HD组无患者死亡(死亡率分别为17.2%和0%,P = 0.003)。HD组日本骨科协会(JOA)评分的改善明显低于非HD组(术前分别为11.9和14.2,P = 0.001;末次随访时分别为19.9和25.1,P < 0.001)。HD组有5例患者接受了再次手术,明显高于非HD组(分别为17.2%和3.5%,P = 0.041)。
本研究表明,接受HD的患者腰椎手术后结局不佳。此外,29例患者中有5例在平均2.4年的随访期内死亡。由于手术结局不佳和死亡率高,必须谨慎考虑HD患者腰椎手术的适应症。