Suppr超能文献

人工流产技术、其对健康的影响及服务方面:文献综述

Techniques of induced abortion, their health implications and service aspects: a review of the literature.

作者信息

Edström K

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 1979;57(3):481-97.

Abstract

This literature review indicates that menstrual regulation during the fifth to seventh week of pregnancy is not always as free from risk as has sometimes been claimed. In particular, it has a higher failure rate, in terms of continued pregnancy, than has abortion by suction in later stages of pregnancy.Vacuum aspiration is still the method of choice until the beginning of the eleventh week of pregnancy. After that, it seems to be slightly more hazardous than dilatation and curettage (D & C). Preoperative cervical dilatation seems to be beneficial after the tenth week, even though its effectiveness in preventing cervical tears and subsequent cervical incompetence in primigravidae remains to be definitely proven.For second trimester abortions, there is an urgent need for controlled studies, in the thirteenth to fifteenth week, to compare the increasingly popular modified D & C technique with various two-stage techniques, both in terms of safety and of cost-effectiveness. Prostaglandins for second trimester abortions have not quite fulfilled their promise as a relatively risk-free technique; they do, however, decrease the time interval between the administration of the abortifacient and the expulsion of the fetus.Aspects of abortion care other than the purely technical ones are much less well covered by research. For instance, very little is known about the acceptability of various abortion and anaesthetic techniques to either pregnant women or hospital staff. More studies are also needed on the interaction of pregnant women with the service providers at various levels and on how this affects their subsequent reproductive behaviour.

摘要

这篇文献综述表明,孕期第五至七周的经期调控并不总是像有时所宣称的那样毫无风险。特别是,就持续妊娠而言,其失败率高于孕晚期的吸宫流产。在妊娠第十一周开始前,真空吸引术仍是首选方法。在此之后,它似乎比刮宫术(D&C)略具危险性。孕十周后,术前宫颈扩张似乎有益,尽管其在预防初产妇宫颈撕裂及后续宫颈机能不全方面的有效性仍有待确切证实。对于中期引产,迫切需要在孕十三至十五周进行对照研究,以比较日益流行的改良刮宫术与各种两阶段技术在安全性和成本效益方面的差异。用于中期引产的前列腺素尚未完全实现其作为相对无风险技术的承诺;然而,它们确实缩短了服用堕胎药至胎儿排出之间的时间间隔。除了纯粹的技术方面,流产护理的其他方面在研究中涉及较少。例如,对于各种流产和麻醉技术对孕妇或医院工作人员的可接受性知之甚少。还需要更多研究探讨孕妇与各级服务提供者之间的互动,以及这如何影响她们随后的生殖行为。

相似文献

4
[Recommendations for abortion technics].[堕胎技术建议]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1981 Apr 1;75(7):305-8.
5
Surgical abortion.手术流产
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Apr;16(2):247-61. doi: 10.1053/beog.2002.0274.
10

本文引用的文献

1
The paramedic abortionist.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1972 Jun;15(2):379-87. doi: 10.1097/00003081-197206000-00010.
4
Laminaria digitata in saline abortions.
Obstet Gynecol. 1974 May;43(5):761-4.
9
Injuries of the cervix after induced midtrimester abortion.孕中期引产术后宫颈损伤
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1973 Mar;80(3):284-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1973.tb02201.x.
10
Studies on the pathogenesis of clotting defects during salt-induced abortions.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973 Mar 1;115(5):656-62. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(73)90614-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验