Naumann Laura, Esdar Moritz, Ammenwerth Elske, Baumberger Dieter, Hübner Ursula
Health Informatics Research Group, University AS Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Institute of Medical Informatics, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Tyrol, Austria.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1012-1016. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190377.
Despite similar policy goals, the adoption of eHealth practices took different paths in Austria (AT), Switzerland (CH), and Germany (GER). We seek to provide a rigorous analysis of the current state of hospitals by focusing on three key eHealth areas: electronic patient records (EPR), health information exchange (HIE), electronic patient communication. For validation and in order to gain better contextual insight we applied a mixed method approach by combining survey results from clinical directors with qualitative interview data from eHealth experts of all three countries. Across countries, EPR adoption rates were reported highest (AT: 52%, CH: 78%, GER: 50%), HIE-rates were partly lower (AT: 52%, CH: 14%, GER: 17%), and electronic patient communication was reported lowest overall (AT: 17%, CH: 8%, GER: 19%). Amongst others, results indicate patient awareness about eHealth to be equally weak across countries, which thus may be an important focal point of future policy initiatives.
尽管政策目标相似,但奥地利(AT)、瑞士(CH)和德国(GER)在采用电子健康实践方面却走了不同的道路。我们旨在通过关注电子健康的三个关键领域:电子病历(EPR)、健康信息交换(HIE)、电子患者沟通,对医院的现状进行严谨分析。为了进行验证并获得更好的背景洞察,我们采用了混合方法,将临床主任的调查结果与来自这三个国家的电子健康专家的定性访谈数据相结合。在各个国家中,电子病历的采用率据报道最高(奥地利:52%,瑞士:78%,德国:50%),健康信息交换率部分较低(奥地利:52%,瑞士:14%,德国:17%),而电子患者沟通总体上据报道最低(奥地利:17%,瑞士:8%,德国:19%)。除其他外,结果表明各国患者对电子健康的认知同样薄弱,因此这可能是未来政策举措的一个重要重点。