Woerter Martin, Stucki Tobias, Arvanitis Spyros, Rammer Christian, Peneder Michael
ETH Zuerich, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Corporate Environmental Management University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Int J Green Energy. 2017 Oct 25;14(14):1192-1208. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2017.1381612. eCollection 2017.
We contribute to the existing research about policy-induced technology adoption in several ways. First, we suggest a new survey design to measure the energy-related policy environment. Second, we simultaneously estimate the policy effects for the adoption propensity and the adoption intensity simultaneously and, third, we compare the policy effects in the three countries, Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Based on a representative sample of firms for all three countries we find that policies essentially promote the adoption of technologies and they are practically ineffective for the intensity, which poses a great challenge to future policy designs. Voluntary agreements or demand-related factors are among the most important drivers for the adoption propensity of green energy technologies. Given the current institutional framework in the surveyed countries, subsidies are more effective in Austria, taxes are more effective in Germany, and demand-related factors are relatively more effective in Switzerland.
我们在几个方面为现有的关于政策驱动型技术采用的研究做出了贡献。首先,我们提出了一种新的调查设计来衡量与能源相关的政策环境。其次,我们同时估计政策对采用倾向和采用强度的影响,第三,我们比较奥地利、德国和瑞士这三个国家的政策效果。基于这三个国家具有代表性的企业样本,我们发现政策在本质上促进了技术的采用,但对采用强度实际上没有效果,这给未来的政策设计带来了巨大挑战。自愿协议或与需求相关的因素是绿色能源技术采用倾向的最重要驱动因素之一。鉴于被调查国家目前的制度框架,补贴在奥地利更有效,税收在德国更有效,与需求相关的因素在瑞士相对更有效。