• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后1天和4天中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比较:器械辅助脊柱融合术后手术部位感染的可靠早期检测标志物

Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion.

作者信息

Yamamoto Yusuke, Iwata Eiichiro, Shigematsu Hideki, Nakajima Hiroshi, Tanaka Masato, Okuda Akinori, Morimoto Yasuhiko, Masuda Keisuke, Koizumi Munehisa, Tanaka Yasuhito

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Otemae Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018 Feb 28;2(2):127-134. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2017-0052. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2017-0052
PMID:31440658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6698500/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To identify the temporal comparison of biochemical markers for early detection of surgical site infection (SSI) following instrumented spinal fusion that are not affected by operative factors.

METHODS

We reviewed data on C-reactive protein level and total white blood cell count and differential count before instrumented spinal fusion and at 1, 4, and 7 days postoperatively. The 141 patients in our sample were divided into an SSI group (patients who developed deep SSI) and a non-SSI group. We investigated the peak or nadir value day and identified those not affected by operative circumstances (operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and number of fusion segments) in the non-SSI group. If there was a significant difference between the peak or nadir value day and the next survey day, we considered the temporal comparison between these unaffected markers as an indicator of SSI and examined the usefulness of these indicators by calculating sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, we investigated the usefulness of the combination of these markers (if even each one marker was recognized, we considered it positive).

RESULTS

Four biochemical markers of SSI were selected: neutrophil percentage at postoperative day 4 more than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 95%), neutrophil count at postoperative day 4 more than day 1 (sensitivity 46%, specificity 93%), lymphocyte percentage at postoperative day 4 less than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 90%), and lymphocyte count at postoperative day 4 less than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 90%). The combination of these markers showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Four markers are reliable indicators for early detection of SSI following spinal instrumented fusion because they are not affected by operative factor. The combination of each indicator had both high sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, it is reliable and much useful for early detection of SSI.

摘要

引言

确定用于早期检测器械辅助脊柱融合术后手术部位感染(SSI)的生化标志物的时间比较,且这些标志物不受手术因素影响。

方法

我们回顾了器械辅助脊柱融合术前以及术后1天、4天和7天的C反应蛋白水平、白细胞总数及分类计数的数据。我们样本中的141例患者被分为SSI组(发生深部SSI的患者)和非SSI组。我们调查了峰值或谷值出现的日期,并确定非SSI组中不受手术情况(手术时间、术中失血和融合节段数)影响的标志物。如果峰值或谷值出现日期与下一次调查日期之间存在显著差异,我们将这些不受影响的标志物之间的时间比较视为SSI的一个指标,并通过计算敏感性和特异性来检验这些指标的有效性。此外,我们还研究了这些标志物组合的有效性(如果任何一个标志物被识别,我们就认为其为阳性)。

结果

选择了四个SSI的生化标志物:术后第4天中性粒细胞百分比高于第1天(敏感性36%,特异性95%),术后第4天中性粒细胞计数高于第1天(敏感性46%,特异性93%),术后第4天淋巴细胞百分比低于第1天(敏感性36%,特异性90%),以及术后第4天淋巴细胞计数低于第1天(敏感性36%,特异性90%)。这些标志物的组合分别显示敏感性为100%,特异性为80%。

结论

四个标志物是器械辅助脊柱融合术后早期检测SSI的可靠指标,因为它们不受手术因素影响。每个指标的组合具有高敏感性和特异性。因此,它对于SSI的早期检测是可靠且非常有用的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cb/6698500/a9cff4947fce/2432-261X-2-0127-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cb/6698500/2390402c699c/2432-261X-2-0127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cb/6698500/a0250e84ab68/2432-261X-2-0127-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cb/6698500/a9cff4947fce/2432-261X-2-0127-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cb/6698500/2390402c699c/2432-261X-2-0127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cb/6698500/a0250e84ab68/2432-261X-2-0127-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cb/6698500/a9cff4947fce/2432-261X-2-0127-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion.术后1天和4天中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比较:器械辅助脊柱融合术后手术部位感染的可靠早期检测标志物
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018 Feb 28;2(2):127-134. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2017-0052. eCollection 2018.
2
Temporal Evolution of White Blood Cell Count and Differential: Reliable and Early Detection Markers for Surgical Site Infection Following Spinal Posterior Decompression Surgery.白细胞计数及分类的时间演变:脊柱后路减压手术后手术部位感染的可靠早期检测标志物
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2021 Nov 4;6(3):271-278. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0105. eCollection 2022.
3
Lymphocyte Count at 4 Days Postoperatively and CRP Level at 7 Days Postoperatively: Reliable and Useful Markers for Surgical Site Infection Following Instrumented Spinal Fusion.术后4天淋巴细胞计数及术后7天CRP水平:脊柱内固定融合术后手术部位感染的可靠且有用的标志物
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 15;41(14):1173-1178. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001501.
4
Lymphocyte Count at 4 Days Postoperatively: A Reliable Screening Marker for Surgical Site Infection After Posterior Lumbar Decompression Surgery.术后第 4 天的淋巴细胞计数:腰椎减压术后手术部位感染的可靠筛查标志物。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Sep 15;43(18):E1096-E1101. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002617.
5
Postoperative lymphocyte percentage and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are useful markers for the early prediction of surgical site infection in spinal decompression surgery.术后淋巴细胞百分比和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是预测脊柱减压术后手术部位感染的有用指标。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Jan-Apr;28(2):2309499020918402. doi: 10.1177/2309499020918402.
6
Lymphopenia and Elevated Blood C-Reactive Protein Levels at Four Days Postoperatively Are Useful Markers for Early Detection of Surgical Site Infection Following Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation Surgery.术后四天的淋巴细胞减少和血液C反应蛋白水平升高是腰椎后路内固定手术后手术部位感染早期检测的有用标志物。
Asian Spine J. 2016 Apr;10(2):220-5. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.220. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
Predictive value of post-operative neutrophil/lymphocyte count ratio for surgical site infection in patients following posterior lumbar spinal surgery.术后中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值对腰椎后路手术后患者手术部位感染的预测价值。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2019 Sep;74:105705. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105705. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
8
Lymphopenia at 4 Days Postoperatively Is the Most Significant Laboratory Marker for Early Detection of Surgical Site Infection Following Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation Surgery.术后4天淋巴细胞减少是腰椎后路内固定手术后早期检测手术部位感染的最重要实验室指标。
Asian Spine J. 2016 Dec;10(6):1042-1046. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1042. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
9
A novel approach for identifying serological markers indicative of surgical-site infection following spine surgery: Postoperative lymphopenia is a risk factor.一种用于鉴定脊柱手术后手术部位感染血清学标志物的新方法:术后淋巴细胞减少症是一个危险因素。
J Orthop Sci. 2022 May;27(3):588-593. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 May 26.
10
The role of lymphocyte count in the early diagnosis of surgical site infection following posterior lumbar fusion.淋巴细胞计数在后路腰椎融合术后手术部位感染早期诊断中的作用。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 May;27(9):3941-3946. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202305_32300.

引用本文的文献

1
The Inflammatory Biomarkers Behavior Profile of Patients Following Elective Degenerative Spine Surgery and Differences Compared to Those Coursing With a Postoperative Spinal Infection: Protocol for a Systematic Review.择期退行性脊柱手术后患者的炎症生物标志物行为特征及其与术后脊柱感染患者的差异:一项系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 28;12:e41555. doi: 10.2196/41555.
2
Preoperative Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio as a Predictive Biomarker for Disease Severity and Spinal Fusion Failure in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion.术前淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值作为腰椎退变性疾病行腰椎融合术患者疾病严重程度和脊柱融合失败的预测生物标志物
J Pain Res. 2022 Sep 13;15:2879-2891. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S379453. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Lymphocyte Count at 4 Days Postoperatively and CRP Level at 7 Days Postoperatively: Reliable and Useful Markers for Surgical Site Infection Following Instrumented Spinal Fusion.术后4天淋巴细胞计数及术后7天CRP水平:脊柱内固定融合术后手术部位感染的可靠且有用的标志物
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 15;41(14):1173-1178. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001501.
2
Role of 18F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose PET/CT in diagnosing surgical site infection after spine surgery with instrumentation.18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖PET/CT在诊断脊柱内固定手术后手术部位感染中的作用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):109-13. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000674.
3
Temporal Evolution of White Blood Cell Count and Differential: Reliable and Early Detection Markers for Surgical Site Infection Following Spinal Posterior Decompression Surgery.白细胞计数及分类的时间演变:脊柱后路减压手术后手术部位感染的可靠早期检测标志物
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2021 Nov 4;6(3):271-278. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0105. eCollection 2022.
Postoperative deep surgical-site infection after instrumented spinal surgery: a multicenter study.
脊柱手术内置物术后深部手术部位感染:一项多中心研究。
Global Spine J. 2013 Jun;3(2):95-102. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343072. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
4
CRP and leukocyte-count after lumbar spine surgery: fusion vs. nucleotomy.腰椎手术后 CRP 和白细胞计数:融合与核切除术。
Acta Orthop. 2011 Aug;82(4):489-93. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.588854. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
5
Procalcitonin as an early predictor of postoperative infectious complications in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury.降钙素原作为急性创伤性脊髓损伤患者术后感染并发症的早期预测指标。
Spinal Cord. 2011 Jun;49(6):715-20. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.190. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
6
Risk factors for deep surgical site infections after spinal fusion.脊柱融合术后深部手术部位感染的危险因素。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Oct;19(10):1711-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1421-y. Epub 2010 May 6.
7
The usefulness of serum amyloid A as a postoperative inflammatory marker after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.血清淀粉样蛋白A作为腰椎后路椎间融合术后炎症标志物的效用。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):555-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22807.
8
The presentation, incidence, etiology, and treatment of surgical site infections after spinal surgery.脊柱手术后手术部位感染的表现、发生率、病因学和治疗。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 1;35(13):1323-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bcde61.
9
Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection following adult spinal surgery.成人脊柱手术后手术部位感染的发生率、患病率及危险因素分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jun 1;34(13):1422-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a03013.
10
Clinical outcome of deep wound infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a matched cohort analysis.后路器械辅助脊柱融合术后深部伤口感染的临床结局:一项匹配队列分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):578-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819a827c.