Suppr超能文献

科学中应重新考虑意外发现——回顾过去?

Unexpected Discoveries Should Be Reconsidered in Science-A Look to the Past?

机构信息

Clinical Biophysics International Research Group, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.

Institute of Translational Pharmacology, National Research Council-CNR, 00133 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 15;20(16):3973. doi: 10.3390/ijms20163973.

Abstract

From the past, we know how much "serendipity" has played a pivotal role in scientific discoveries. The definition of serendipity implies the finding of one thing while looking for something else. The most known example of this is the discovery of penicillin. Fleming was studying "Staphylococcus influenzae" when one of his culture plates became contaminated and developed a mold that created a bacteria-free circle. Then he found within the mold, a substance that proved to be very active against the vast majority of bacteria infecting human beings. Serendipity had a key role in the discovery of a wide panel of psychotropic drugs as well, including aniline purple, lysergic acid diethylamide, meprobamate, chlorpromazine, and imipramine. Actually, many recent studies support a step back in current strategies that could lead to new discoveries in science. This change should seriously consider the idea that to further focus research project milestones that are already too focused could be a mistake. How can you observe something that others did not realize before you? Probably, one pivotal requirement is that you pay a high level of attention on what is occurring all around you. But this is not entirely enough, since, specifically talking about scientific discoveries, you should have your mind sufficiently unbiased from mainstream infrastructures, which normally make you extremely focused on a particular endpoint without paying attention to potential "unexpected discoveries". Research in medicine should probably come back to the age of innocence and avoid the age of mainstream reports that do not contribute to real advances in the curing of human diseases. Max Planck said "Science progresses not because scientists change their minds, but rather because scientists attached to erroneous views die, and are replaced", and Otto Warburg used the same words when he realized the lack of acceptance of his ideas. This editorial proposes a series of examples showing, in a practical way, how unfocused research may contribute to very important discoveries in science.

摘要

从过去的经验来看,我们深知“机缘巧合”在科学发现中扮演着多么重要的角色。“机缘巧合”一词的定义是指在寻找某样东西时却意外地发现了另一样东西。青霉素的发现就是最著名的例子。弗莱明在研究“流感嗜血杆菌”时,他的一个培养皿受到了污染,其中的一种霉菌生长并形成了一个没有细菌的圆圈。然后他发现,这种霉菌中有一种物质对绝大多数感染人类的细菌都非常有效。机缘巧合在发现一系列广泛的精神药物方面也起到了关键作用,包括苯胺紫、麦角酸二乙基酰胺、美普他酚、氯丙嗪和丙咪嗪。实际上,许多最近的研究支持在当前策略上退一步,这可能会导致科学上的新发现。这种变化应该认真考虑这样一个想法,即过于专注已经过于集中的研究项目里程碑可能是一个错误。你怎么能观察到别人以前没有意识到的东西呢?也许,一个关键的要求是,你要高度关注你周围正在发生的事情。但这还不完全足够,因为具体来说,就科学发现而言,你应该让自己的思维不受主流基础设施的影响,因为主流基础设施通常会让你专注于一个特定的终点,而不关注潜在的“意外发现”。医学研究可能需要回到天真无邪的时代,避免主流报告的时代,这些报告不会促进人类疾病治疗的真正进步。马克斯·普朗克曾说过:“科学的进步不是因为科学家改变了主意,而是因为坚持错误观点的科学家去世了,而那些没有坚持错误观点的人取而代之”,奥托·瓦尔堡在意识到自己的观点不被接受时也用了同样的话。这篇社论提出了一系列的例子,以一种实际的方式展示了不集中的研究如何有助于科学的重要发现。

相似文献

2
The role of serendipity in drug discovery.偶然机遇在药物发现中的作用。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2006;8(3):335-44. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2006.8.3/tban.
4
EMPIRICISM IN LATTER-DAY BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE.当代行为科学中的经验主义。
Science. 1964 Jul 31;145(3631):464-7. doi: 10.1126/science.145.3631.464.
5
THE EFFECT OF DRUGS ON THE ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM OF MAN.药物对人体脑电图的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1964 Jan-Feb;5:102-16. doi: 10.1002/cpt196451102.
10
[Not Available.].[无可用内容。]
Acta Hist Leopoldina. 2016(65):299-369.

本文引用的文献

5
Targeting acidity in cancer and diabetes.靶向癌症和糖尿病的酸性环境。
Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2019 Apr;1871(2):273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
8
Cell-in-cell phenomena in cancer.癌细胞中的细胞吞噬现象。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Dec;18(12):758-766. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0073-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验