• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解影响急诊普通外科质量改进成功的因素:从 RCS 胆囊-QIC 项目中学习。

Understanding the influences on successful quality improvement in emergency general surgery: learning from the RCS Chole-QuIC project.

机构信息

William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, c/o ACCU RESEARCH TEAM, 4th Floor, Central Tower, The Royal London Hospital, LONDON, E1 1BB, United Kingdom.

Practicality Consulting, London, UK.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2019 Aug 23;14(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0932-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13012-019-0932-0
PMID:31443689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6708165/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute gallstone disease is the highest volume Emergency General Surgical presentation in the UK. Recent data indicate wide variations in the quality of care provided across the country, with national guidance for care delivery not implemented in most UK hospitals. Against this backdrop, the Royal College of Surgeons of England set up a 13-hospital quality improvement collaborative (Chole-QuIC) to support clinical teams to reduce time to surgery for patients with acute gallstone disease requiring emergency cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Prospective, mixed-methods process evaluation to answer the following: (1) how was the collaborative delivered by the faculty and received, understood and enacted by the participants; (2) what influenced teams' ability to improve care for patients requiring emergency cholecystectomy? We collected and analysed a range of data including field notes, ethnographic observations of meetings, and project documentation. Analysis was based on the framework approach, informed by Normalisation Process Theory, and involved the creation of comparative case studies based on hospital performance during the project.

RESULTS

Chole-QuIC was delivered as planned and was well received and understood by participants. Four hospitals were identified as highly successful, based upon a substantial increase in the number of patients having surgery in line with national guidance. Conversely, four hospitals were identified as challenged, achieving no significant improvement. The comparative analysis indicate that six inter-related influences appeared most associated with improvement: (1) achieving clarity of purpose amongst site leads and key stakeholders; (2) capacity to lead and effective project support; (3) ideas to action; (4) learning from own and others' experience; (5) creating additional capacity to do emergency cholecystectomies; and (6) coordinating/managing the patient pathway.

CONCLUSION

Collaborative-based quality improvement is a viable strategy for emergency surgery but success requires the deployment of effective clinical strategies in conjunction with improvement strategies. In particular, achieving clarity of purpose about proposed changes amongst key stakeholders was a vital precursor to improvement, enabling the creation of additional surgical capacity and new pathways to be implemented effectively. Protected time, testing ideas, and the ability to learn quickly from data and experience were associated with greater impact within this cohort.

摘要

背景

急性胆石病是英国急诊普通外科就诊量最高的疾病。最近的数据表明,全国各地的医疗质量存在很大差异,国家提供护理的指导方针并未在英国大多数医院实施。在此背景下,英格兰皇家外科学院成立了一个由 13 家医院组成的质量改进合作组织(Chole-QuIC),以支持临床团队为需要紧急胆囊切除术的急性胆石病患者缩短手术时间。

方法

前瞻性、混合方法的过程评估,旨在回答以下问题:(1)教师如何提供合作,参与者如何接受、理解和实施;(2)是什么影响了团队为需要紧急胆囊切除术的患者改善护理的能力?我们收集和分析了一系列数据,包括现场记录、会议的民族志观察以及项目文件。分析基于框架方法,并借鉴了正常化进程理论,根据项目期间医院的绩效创建了对比案例研究。

结果

Chole-QuIC 按计划交付,受到参与者的欢迎和理解。根据与国家指导方针一致的手术患者数量的大幅增加,有 4 家医院被确定为高度成功。相比之下,有 4 家医院被确定为面临挑战,没有取得显著改善。对比分析表明,有六个相互关联的影响因素似乎与改善最相关:(1)在现场领导和主要利益相关者中达成明确的目标;(2)领导能力和有效的项目支持;(3)将想法付诸行动;(4)从自身和他人的经验中学习;(5)创造额外的能力进行急诊胆囊切除术;以及(6)协调/管理患者路径。

结论

基于合作的质量改进是急诊手术的可行策略,但成功需要在实施有效的临床策略的同时,采用改进策略。特别是,在关键利益相关者中就拟议变革达成明确目标是改进的重要前提,可以有效地实施额外的手术能力和新的途径。在本队列中,明确目标、测试想法以及从数据和经验中快速学习的能力与更大的影响力相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e3/6708165/6a3ae3e25f7a/13012_2019_932_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e3/6708165/ed95eb171e0a/13012_2019_932_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e3/6708165/1d9bd36eb27b/13012_2019_932_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e3/6708165/7576b75dde9a/13012_2019_932_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e3/6708165/6a3ae3e25f7a/13012_2019_932_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e3/6708165/ed95eb171e0a/13012_2019_932_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e3/6708165/1d9bd36eb27b/13012_2019_932_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e3/6708165/7576b75dde9a/13012_2019_932_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59e3/6708165/6a3ae3e25f7a/13012_2019_932_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding the influences on successful quality improvement in emergency general surgery: learning from the RCS Chole-QuIC project.理解影响急诊普通外科质量改进成功的因素:从 RCS 胆囊-QIC 项目中学习。
Implement Sci. 2019 Aug 23;14(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0932-0.
2
Effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative in reducing time to surgery for patients requiring emergency cholecystectomy.质量改进协作在减少急诊胆囊切除术患者手术时间方面的效果。
BJS Open. 2019 Oct 8;3(6):802-811. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50221. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy: one site experience of the Chole-QuiC process.向急诊胆囊切除术转变的范例:Chole-QuiC 流程的单站点经验。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Sep;106(7):601-609. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
4
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
5
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Increasing Throughput: Results from a 42-Hospital Collaborative to Improve Emergency Department Flow.提高吞吐量:42家医院合作改善急诊科流程的结果。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Dec;41(12):532-42. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41070-0.
7
Review DebrIeF: a collaborative distributed leadership approach to "hot debrief" after cardiac arrest in the emergency department - a quality improvement project.回顾 DebrIeF:一种协作分布式领导方法,用于在急诊科心脏骤停后进行“热点讨论”——一项质量改进项目。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2022 Mar 14;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-06-2021-0050.
8
Interactional Resources for Quality Improvement: Learning From Participants Through a Qualitative Study.质量改进的互动资源:通过定性研究向参与者学习
Qual Manag Health Care. 2017 Apr/Jun;26(2):55-62. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000128.
9
Improved management of acute gallstone disease after regional surgical subspecialization.区域外科亚专业划分后急性胆结石疾病管理的改善
World J Surg. 2008 Dec;32(12):2690-4. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9749-8.
10
Rapid evaluation of the Special Measures for Quality and challenged provider regimes: a mixed-methods study.快速评估质量特别措施和有问题的供应商制度:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(19):1-139. doi: 10.3310/GQQV3512.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes after index cholecystectomy: a UK longitudinal multi-centre cohort Study.初次胆囊切除术后的结局:一项英国纵向多中心队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jan 7;410(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03567-7.
2
Adherence to vascular care guidelines for emergency revascularization of chronic limb-threatening ischemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血紧急血运重建的血管护理指南依从性。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Aug 25;9(4):101299. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101299. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy: one site experience of the Chole-QuiC process.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative in reducing time to surgery for patients requiring emergency cholecystectomy.质量改进协作在减少急诊胆囊切除术患者手术时间方面的效果。
BJS Open. 2019 Oct 8;3(6):802-811. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50221. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
Improving care at scale: process evaluation of a multi-component quality improvement intervention to reduce mortality after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH trial).规模化改善医疗服务:一项多环节质量改进干预措施以降低急诊腹部手术后死亡率的效果评价(EPOCH 试验)。
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 13;13(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0823-9.
3
Simple rules for evidence translation in complex systems: A qualitative study.
向急诊胆囊切除术转变的范例:Chole-QuiC 流程的单站点经验。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Sep;106(7):601-609. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
4
Effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives in UK surgical settings and barriers and facilitators influencing their implementation: a systematic review and evidence synthesis.英国外科环境中质量改进合作的有效性及其实施的障碍和促进因素:系统评价和证据综合。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Apr;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002241.
5
Specialist-led urgent cholecystectomy for acute gallstone disease.专家主导的急性胆石症紧急胆囊切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1038-1043. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09591-2. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
6
Contemporary management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a survey of Spanish surgeons.当代胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的治疗:西班牙外科医生的调查。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5024-5033. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07984-9. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
7
Effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative in reducing time to surgery for patients requiring emergency cholecystectomy.质量改进协作在减少急诊胆囊切除术患者手术时间方面的效果。
BJS Open. 2019 Oct 8;3(6):802-811. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50221. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Quality improvement and emergency laparotomy care: what have we learnt from recent major QI efforts?质量改进和急诊剖腹手术护理:我们从最近的重大质量改进努力中学到了什么?
Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Nov;19(6):454-457. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019.0251.
简单规则用于复杂系统中的证据转化:一项定性研究。
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1076-9.
4
Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review.运用常态化进程理论对复杂医疗干预措施的可行性研究和进程评估:系统综述。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 7;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1.
5
When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change.当复杂性科学遇见实施科学:系统变革的理论与实证分析。
BMC Med. 2018 Apr 30;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1057-z.
6
Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review.质量改进合作是否有效?系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):226-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
7
Population-based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases.基于人群的队列研究:良性胆囊疾病中急诊胆囊切除术使用的变化。
Br J Surg. 2016 Nov;103(12):1716-1726. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10288. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
8
Population-based cohort study of outcomes following cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases.基于人群的胆囊良性疾病行胆囊切除术的结局的队列研究。
Br J Surg. 2016 Nov;103(12):1704-1715. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10287. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
9
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
10
Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development.《2030年全球外科手术:实现健康、福祉和经济发展的证据与解决方案》
Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):569-624. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-X. Epub 2015 Apr 26.