College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom.
College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom.
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Apr;48(4):433-442. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
Years of global antibiotic misuse has led to the progression of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), posing a direct threat to public health. To impact AMR and maintain antimicrobial viability, educational interventions toward fostering positive AMR behavior change have been employed with some success.
This scoping review sought to identify research-supporting use of public educational AMR campaigns, and their efficacy toward informing positive AMR behaviors to inform current debate. To enable credible and reflexive examination of a wide variety of literature, Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework was used.
Three primary themes were identified: (1) behavior change and theoretical underpinnings, (2) intervention paradigm, and (3) educational engagement. From 94 abstracts identified, 31 articles were chosen for review. More attention is required to identify elements of intervention design that inform and sustain behavior change, and the impact of how an intervention is delivered and targeted is needed to limit assumptions of population homogeneity, which potentially limits intervention efficacy. Moreover, research on the impact of hospital-based inpatient interventions is needed.
The existing body of research fails to provide robust evidence to support sound evidential interventions supported by theoretical justifications. Furthermore, interventions to ensure long-term sustained behavior change are unclear and not addressed.
多年来全球抗生素的滥用导致了抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)的发展,直接威胁到公众健康。为了对抗 AMR 并保持抗菌药物的有效性,已经采取了一些教育干预措施来培养积极的 AMR 行为改变,这些措施取得了一定的成功。
本范围综述旨在确定支持使用公共教育 AMR 运动的研究,并评估其告知积极的 AMR 行为以告知当前辩论的效果。为了能够对各种文献进行可信和反思性的检查,采用了 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)的方法框架。
确定了三个主要主题:(1)行为改变和理论基础,(2)干预范例,和(3)教育参与。从确定的 94 个摘要中,选择了 31 篇文章进行综述。需要更多关注确定告知和维持行为改变的干预设计要素,以及干预交付和针对性的影响,以限制对人群同质性的假设,这可能会限制干预的效果。此外,还需要研究基于医院的住院患者干预措施的影响。
现有研究未能提供有力的证据支持有理论依据的合理干预措施。此外,确保长期持续行为改变的干预措施尚不清楚,也未得到解决。