• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国门诊医生电子问诊采用率的趋势:来自 2011-2015 年NAMCS 的证据。

Trends in e-visit adoption among U.S. office-based physicians: Evidence from the 2011-2015 NAMCS.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2019 Sep;129:260-266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.025
PMID:31445265
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic visits (e-visits) have the potential to expand patients' access to care and reduce healthcare costs. We aimed to describe trends in e-visit adoption among the U.S. office-based physicians and examine physician-and practice-level factors associated with e-visit adoption.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of 2011-2015 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. We used the Cochran-Armitage tests to evaluate trend changes in e-visit adoption among the U.S. office-based physicians. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate the odds of adopting e-visits adjusting for physician and practice characteristics.

RESULTS

Our sample included 10,767 respondents, representing 327,836 office-based physicians in the U.S. Our analysis indicated that, in 2015, 15.9% of physicians adopted e-visits, which is a minor increase of 2.2% in total utilization of 13.7% in 2011. The likelihood of adopting e-visits was 2.7 times higher for physicians who have fully implemented electronic health records systems compared (odds ratio, 2.66, [95% CI, 2.16-3.28]) to physicians who have not implemented EHRs. Other predictors of e-visit adoption included primary care rather than specialty care, capitated payment model, and having a secure messaging capability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that overall e-visit adoption is low and has not been implemented as rapidly as other health information technologies. While use of secure information technology could be a facilitator for e-visit implementation, there are other barriers affecting widespread adoption. E-visits are a promising strategy for increasing patients' access to care. Future research is needed to explore implementation barriers that might be impeding e-visit adoption.

摘要

背景

电子访视 (e-visit) 有扩大患者获得医疗服务的机会并降低医疗成本的潜力。我们旨在描述美国门诊医生采用电子访视的趋势,并研究与电子访视采用相关的医生和实践层面的因素。

方法

这是一项对 2011-2015 年全国门诊医疗调查的回顾性观察性研究。我们使用 Cochran-Armitage 检验来评估美国门诊医生采用电子访视的趋势变化。多变量逻辑回归用于计算调整医生和实践特征后采用电子访视的可能性。

结果

我们的样本包括 10767 名受访者,代表美国 327836 名门诊医生。我们的分析表明,2015 年有 15.9%的医生采用了电子访视,这比 2011 年总利用率 13.7%略有增加 2.2%。与未实施电子健康记录系统的医生相比,全面实施电子健康记录系统的医生采用电子访视的可能性高出 2.7 倍(优势比,2.66 [95%置信区间,2.16-3.28])。采用电子访视的其他预测因素包括初级保健而非专科保健、人头付费模式以及具有安全消息传递功能。

结论

我们的研究表明,总体而言,电子访视的采用率较低,并且没有像其他健康信息技术那样迅速实施。虽然使用安全信息技术可能是电子访视实施的促进因素,但还有其他影响广泛采用的障碍。电子访视是增加患者获得医疗服务机会的有前途的策略。需要进一步研究以探索可能阻碍电子访视采用的实施障碍。

相似文献

1
Trends in e-visit adoption among U.S. office-based physicians: Evidence from the 2011-2015 NAMCS.美国门诊医生电子问诊采用率的趋势:来自 2011-2015 年NAMCS 的证据。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Sep;129:260-266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
2
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 summary.国家门诊医疗护理调查:2001年总结
Adv Data. 2003 Aug 11(337):1-44.
3
Disparities in Secure Messaging Uptake Between Patients and Physicians: Longitudinal Analysis of Two National Cross-Sectional Surveys.患者与医生之间安全消息传递使用情况的差异:两项全国性横断面调查的纵向分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 1;22(5):e12611. doi: 10.2196/12611.
4
National estimates of the impact of electronic health records on the workload of primary care physicians.电子健康记录对基层医疗医生工作量影响的全国性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 10;16:172. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1422-6.
5
Office-Based Tools and Primary Care Visit Communication, Length, and Preventive Service Delivery.基于办公室的工具与初级保健就诊沟通、时长及预防服务提供
Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr;51(2):728-45. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12348. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
6
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 summary.国家门诊医疗护理调查:2002年总结
Adv Data. 2004 Aug 26(346):1-44.
7
Ambulatory care visits for asthma: United States, 1993-94.1993 - 1994年美国哮喘门诊就诊情况
Adv Data. 1996 Sep 27(277):1.
8
Nonresponse Bias in Estimates From the 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.2012年国家门诊医疗护理调查估计中的无应答偏差
Vital Health Stat 2. 2016 Feb(171):1-42.
9
Physician Office Visits That Included Complementary Health Approaches in U.S. Adults: 2005-2015.美国成年人的医师就诊中包含补充健康方法:2005-2015 年。
J Integr Complement Med. 2022 Aug;28(8):641-650. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2021.0331. Epub 2022 May 13.
10
National Trends in Primary Care Visit Use and Practice Capabilities, 2008-2015.2008-2015 年初级保健就诊使用和实践能力的国家趋势。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Nov;17(6):538-544. doi: 10.1370/afm.2474.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations Between Telemedicine Use Barriers, Organizational Factors, and Physician Perceptions of Care Quality.远程医疗使用障碍、组织因素与医生对医疗质量的认知之间的关联
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Dec;30(12):2883-2889. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0249. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Patient Perceptions of e-Visits: Qualitative Study of Older Adults to Inform Health System Implementation.患者对电子就诊的看法:针对老年人的定性研究以指导医疗系统实施
JMIR Aging. 2023 May 26;6:e45641. doi: 10.2196/45641.
3
Telehealth Can Be Implemented Across a Musculoskeletal Service Line Without Compromising Patient Satisfaction.
远程医疗可以在整个肌肉骨骼服务线上实施,而不会影响患者满意度。
HSS J. 2021 Feb;17(1):36-45. doi: 10.1177/1556331620977171. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
4
Population-Level Interest and Telehealth Capacity of US Hospitals in Response to COVID-19: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Google Search and National Hospital Survey Data.人口层面上美国医院对 COVID-19 的兴趣和远程医疗能力:对谷歌搜索和国家医院调查数据的横断面分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 7;6(2):e18961. doi: 10.2196/18961.