Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile; Département de Psychologie Cognitive & Neuropsychologie, Institut de Psychologie, Laboratoire d'Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
Escuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102931. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102931. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
We investigated the effectiveness of galvanic cutaneous stimulation (GCS) and auditory stimulation (AS) together and separately in mitigating motion sickness (MS). Forty-eight drivers (twenty-two men; mean age = 21.58 years) participated in a driving simulation experiment. We compared the total scores of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) across four different stimulation conditions (GCS, AS, Mixed GCS-AS and no stimulation as a baseline condition). We provided evidence that mixing techniques mitigates MS owing to an improvement in body balance; furthermore, mixing techniques improves driving behavior more effectively than GCS and AS in isolation. We encourage the use of the two techniques together to decrease MS.
我们研究了电皮肤刺激（GCS）和听觉刺激（AS）联合及单独使用对缓解运动病（MS）的效果。48 名驾驶员（22 名男性；平均年龄 21.58 岁）参与了驾驶模拟实验。我们比较了四个不同刺激条件（GCS、AS、混合 GCS-AS 和无刺激作为基线条件）下模拟器晕车问卷（SSQ）的总分。我们提供的证据表明，混合技术通过改善身体平衡来缓解 MS；此外，混合技术比 GCS 和 AS 单独使用更有效地改善驾驶行为。我们鼓励使用这两种技术来降低 MS 的发生率。
