Gálvez-García Germán, Hay Marion, Gabaude Catherine
Université de Lyon IFSTTAR-LESCOT F-69675, Bron, FranceUniversity of Padova, Padova, Italy
Université de Lyon IFSTTAR-LESCOT F-69675, Bron, FranceINSERM U1075 COMETE, Caen, France.
Hum Factors. 2015 Jun;57(4):649-57. doi: 10.1177/0018720814554948. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
In a driving simulation, we investigated the efficacy of galvanic cutaneous stimulation (GCS) provided during curves or intermittently during the whole circuit to mitigate simulator syndrome (SS).
The literature on how GCS decreases SS, although scarce, has demonstrated the effectiveness of this technique. Stimulation with this and similar techniques has usually been provided in curves or continuously during the whole circuit but never intermittently. This stimulation method could generate a continued activation of processes related to GCS mitigating SS.
Fifteen drivers (8 men; mean age = 25.5 years) participated in this experiment. We compared the total scores of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) across three stimulation conditions: (a) curve GCS condition, whereby GCS was provided in curves; (b) intermittent GCS condition, whereby GCS was provided intermittently during the whole circuit; and (c) no-stimulation condition, whereby no stimulation was provided (baseline condition).
The experimental outcomes revealed that GCS decreased SS in both the curve and intermittent stimulation conditions.
We provide evidence that GCS is an effective countermeasure to decrease SS. It could be applied indifferently in curves or intermittently during the whole circuit.
For future interventions, we recommend the use of GCS to mitigate SS with similar intermittent stimulation programs. These programs have a crucial advantage as they are easily integrated into the simulator setup without the necessity of generating a complicated experimental design to stimulate during the curves.
在驾驶模拟实验中,我们研究了在弯道处或在整个驾驶过程中间歇性地提供皮肤电刺激(GCS)以减轻模拟器综合征(SS)的效果。
关于GCS如何减轻SS的文献虽然稀少,但已证明了该技术的有效性。通常在弯道处或在整个驾驶过程中持续进行这种刺激以及类似技术的刺激,但从未间歇进行过。这种刺激方法可能会持续激活与GCS减轻SS相关的过程。
15名驾驶员(8名男性;平均年龄 = 25.5岁)参与了本实验。我们比较了在三种刺激条件下模拟器不适问卷(SSQ)的总分:(a)弯道GCS条件,即在弯道处提供GCS;(b)间歇GCS条件,即在整个驾驶过程中间歇性地提供GCS;(c)无刺激条件,即不提供刺激(基线条件)。
实验结果表明,在弯道和间歇刺激条件下,GCS均能减轻SS。
我们提供证据表明,GCS是减轻SS的有效对策。它可以在弯道处或在整个驾驶过程中间歇性地无差别应用。
对于未来的干预措施,我们建议使用GCS并采用类似的间歇刺激方案来减轻SS。这些方案具有关键优势,因为它们可以轻松集成到模拟器设置中,而无需设计复杂的实验来在弯道处进行刺激。