• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮套管针芯活检在经内镜无法切除的巨大结肠息肉手术治疗中的应用:一项系统评价研究。

The Application of Core Needle Biopsy Through the Trocar Hole in the Surgical Operation of Endoscopically Unresectable Giant Colon Polyps: A Systematic Review Study.

机构信息

General Surgery Department, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100144, China.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2662-2672. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01635-8. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-021-01635-8
PMID:33864202
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to investigate the application of core needle biopsy through the trocar hole during surgery on endoscopically unresectable giant colon polyps.

METHODS

The clinical data of 51 patients with endoscopically unresectable giant colon polyps from May 2016 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary observational outcomes were two comparative analyses of pathologic results, using the kappa index: comparison of the pathologic results from the preoperative colonoscopy and the postoperative pathologic results and comparison of the intraoperative pathologic results from core needle biopsy of the intestinal wall and the postoperative pathologic results. The secondary observational outcomes were duration of needle biopsy, operation duration, volume of intraoperative hemorrhage, rate of postoperative wound infection, rate of abdominal cavity infection, length of stay, and number and positivity of lymph node dissections after laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer.

RESULTS

Poor consistency was found between the preoperative (colonoscopy) and postoperative pathologic results, with kappa = 0.222 (i.e., kappa < 0.4), P < 0.05. However, good consistency was found between the intraoperative (core needle biopsy) and postoperative pathologic results, with kappa = 0.923 (i.e., kappa ≥ 0.75), P < 0.05. The postoperative pathologic results were as follows: 7 cases of adenomatous polyps of the colon, 12 cases of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 12 cases of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and 25 cases of invasive colon cancer. There was no incision infection, no abdominal cavity infection or formation of an abdominal abscess, no anastomotic leakage, and no death for any of the 51 patients. Postoperative complications occurred in two cases (3.92%).

CONCLUSION

Biopsy through the trocar hole during laparoscopic surgery produced highly accurate pathologic results and was a fast, safe, and effective diagnostic method. Pathologic results from intraoperative biopsy could accurately determine the nature of colon polyps and provide a basis for choosing an appropriate surgical scheme.

摘要

介绍

本研究旨在探讨在无法经内镜切除的巨大结肠息肉患者的手术中通过套管针孔进行空心针活检的应用。

方法

回顾性分析 2016 年 5 月至 2020 年 5 月期间 51 例无法经内镜切除的巨大结肠息肉患者的临床资料。主要观察指标为两种病理结果的对比分析,使用kappa 指数:术前结肠镜检查与术后病理结果的对比分析,以及肠壁空心针活检的术中病理结果与术后病理结果的对比分析。次要观察指标为针活检持续时间、手术持续时间、术中出血量、术后伤口感染率、腹腔感染率、住院时间、腹腔镜结肠癌根治术后淋巴结清扫的数量和阳性率。

结果

术前(结肠镜检查)与术后病理结果一致性较差,kappa 值为 0.222(即 kappa 值<0.4),P<0.05。然而,术中(空心针活检)与术后病理结果一致性较好,kappa 值为 0.923(即 kappa 值≥0.75),P<0.05。术后病理结果如下:结肠腺瘤性息肉 7 例,低级别上皮内瘤变 12 例,高级别上皮内瘤变 12 例,浸润性结肠癌 25 例。51 例患者均无切口感染、腹腔感染或脓肿形成、吻合口漏、死亡。术后发生并发症 2 例(3.92%)。

结论

腹腔镜手术中经套管针孔活检获得了高度准确的病理结果,是一种快速、安全、有效的诊断方法。术中活检的病理结果可准确判断结肠息肉的性质,为选择合适的手术方案提供依据。

相似文献

1
The Application of Core Needle Biopsy Through the Trocar Hole in the Surgical Operation of Endoscopically Unresectable Giant Colon Polyps: A Systematic Review Study.经皮套管针芯活检在经内镜无法切除的巨大结肠息肉手术治疗中的应用:一项系统评价研究。
Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2662-2672. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01635-8. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
2
Laparoscopic right colectomy vs laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术与腹腔镜辅助结肠镜息肉切除术治疗内镜下不可切除息肉的随机对照试验
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Nov;18(11):1050-1056. doi: 10.1111/codi.13346.
3
Laparoscopic colon resection for polyps: a good novice case?腹腔镜下息肉切除术治疗结肠息肉:是适合新手的好病例吗?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Jun;49(6):879-82. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0530-5.
4
Combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) can avoid segmental colectomy in endoscopically unremovable colonic polyps: a cohort study over 10 years.联合内镜腹腔镜手术(CELS)可避免内镜无法切除的结肠息肉的节段性结肠切除术:超过 10 年的队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):196-205. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08255-3. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
[Surgical treatment for endoscopically unresectable polyps of colon and rectum].[结肠和直肠内镜下不可切除息肉的外科治疗]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Feb 26;93(8):588-91.
6
Laparoscopic colon resection of benign polyps: high grade dysplasia on endoscopic biopsy and polyp location predict risk of cancer.腹腔镜下良性息肉结肠切除术:内镜活检的高级别异型增生及息肉位置可预测癌症风险。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Jun;19(3):255-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181a6e494.
7
Laparoscopic wedge resection as an alternative to laparoscopic oncological colon resection for benign endoscopically unresectable colon polyps.腹腔镜楔形切除术作为一种替代方法,用于治疗良性内镜下不可切除的结肠息肉,以替代腹腔镜肿瘤结肠切除术。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Sep;23(9):2361-2367. doi: 10.1111/codi.15769. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
8
Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy: the Texas Endosurgery Institute experience.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Sep;43(9):1246-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02237429.
9
Dynamic article: combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery for complex colonic polyps: postoperative outcomes and video demonstration of 3 key operative techniques.动态文章:内镜-腹腔镜联合手术治疗复杂结肠息肉:术后结果及3项关键手术技术的视频演示
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Mar;58(3):363-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000311.
10
Colonoscopic-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection versus segmental colon resection for benign colonic polyps: a comparative cost analysis.结肠镜辅助腹腔镜楔形切除术与节段性结肠切除术治疗良性结肠息肉的比较:成本分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Nov;25(11):2147-2154. doi: 10.1111/codi.16757. Epub 2023 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing surgical precision: unveiling the impact of preoperative colonoscopy in anal fistula patients.提高手术精度:揭示术前结肠镜检查对肛瘘患者的影响。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03066-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgery Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Polyps: Making Sense of When to Use Which Approach.大型息肉的手术治疗与内镜下黏膜切除术及内镜下黏膜下剥离术:明确何时采用何种方法
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019 Oct;29(4):675-685. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Role of Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection in Management of Malignant Colon Polyps: a National Cancer Database Analysis.内镜切除术与手术切除术在恶性结肠息肉治疗中的作用:国家癌症数据库分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jan;24(1):177-187. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04356-0. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
3
Forceps Biopsies Are Not Reliable in the Workup of Large Colorectal Lesions Referred for Endoscopic Resection: Should They Be Abandoned?
对于因内镜切除而转诊的大型结直肠病变,活检钳活检不可靠:是否应放弃?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Sep;62(9):1063-1070. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001440.
4
The short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery for colorectal tumors (LECS-CR) in cases involving endoscopically unresectable colorectal tumors.腹腔镜内镜联合手术治疗内镜不可切除结直肠肿瘤的短期疗效。
Surg Today. 2019 Dec;49(12):1051-1057. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01840-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
Management of the colorectal polyp referred for resection: A case-matched comparison of advanced endoscopic surgery and laparoscopic colectomy.经内镜切除的结直肠息肉的处理:先进内镜手术与腹腔镜结肠切除术的病例对照比较。
Surgery. 2018 Mar;163(3):522-527. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.057. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Polypectomy and advanced endoscopic resection.息肉切除术及高级内镜切除术。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;8(2):110-114. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2016-100769. Epub 2017 Feb 10.