Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
School of Psychological Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Psychol Med. 2020 Oct;50(13):2154-2170. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002034. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Despite extensive research, symptom structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly debated. The network approach to psychopathology offers a novel method for understanding and conceptualizing PTSD. However, extant studies have mainly used small samples and self-report measures among sub-clinical populations, while also overlooking co-morbid depressive symptoms.
PTSD symptom network topology was estimated in a sample of 1489 treatment-seeking veteran patients based on a clinician-rated PTSD measure. Next, clinician-rated depressive symptoms were incorporated into the network to assess their influence on PTSD network structure. The PTSD-symptom network was then contrasted with the network of 306 trauma-exposed (TE) treatment-seeking patients not meeting full criteria for PTSD to assess corresponding network differences. Finally, a directed acyclic graph (DAG) was computed to estimate potential directionality among symptoms, including depressive symptoms and daily functioning.
The PTSD symptom network evidenced robust reliability. Flashbacks and getting emotionally upset by trauma reminders emerged as the most central nodes in the PTSD network, regardless of the inclusion of depressive symptoms. Distinct clustering emerged for PTSD and depressive symptoms within the comorbidity network. DAG analysis suggested a key triggering role for re-experiencing symptoms. Network topology in the PTSD sample was significantly distinct from that of the TE sample.
Flashbacks and psychological reactions to trauma reminders, along with their strong connections to other re-experiencing symptoms, have a pivotal role in the clinical presentation of combat-related PTSD among veterans. Depressive and posttraumatic symptoms constitute two separate diagnostic entities, but with meaningful between-disorder connections, suggesting two mutually-influential systems.
尽管进行了广泛的研究,但创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的症状结构仍存在很大争议。精神病理学的网络方法为理解和概念化 PTSD 提供了一种新方法。然而,现有的研究主要使用小样本和亚临床人群的自我报告措施,同时也忽略了共病抑郁症状。
根据临床医生评定的 PTSD 量表,对 1489 名寻求治疗的退伍军人患者样本中的 PTSD 症状网络拓扑结构进行了估计。接下来,将临床医生评定的抑郁症状纳入网络中,以评估其对 PTSD 网络结构的影响。然后将 PTSD 症状网络与 306 名未达到 PTSD 全部标准的创伤暴露(TE)寻求治疗的患者的网络进行对比,以评估相应的网络差异。最后,计算有向无环图(DAG)以估计症状之间的潜在方向性,包括抑郁症状和日常功能。
PTSD 症状网络具有很强的可靠性。闪回和因创伤记忆而情绪激动成为 PTSD 网络中最核心的节点,无论是否包括抑郁症状。在共病网络中,PTSD 和抑郁症状出现明显的聚类。DAG 分析表明,再体验症状起着关键的触发作用。PTSD 样本中的网络拓扑结构与 TE 样本显著不同。
闪回和对创伤记忆的心理反应,以及它们与其他再体验症状的强烈联系,在退伍军人的战斗相关 PTSD 临床表现中起着关键作用。抑郁和创伤后症状构成两个独立的诊断实体,但具有有意义的疾病间联系,表明存在两个相互影响的系统。