The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
The Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2512-2519. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05258-2. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Many older adults receive unnecessary screening colonoscopies. We previously conducted a survey using a national online panel to assess older adults' preferences for how clinicians can discuss stopping screening colonoscopies. We sought to assess the generalizability of those results by comparing them to a sample of older adults with low health literacy.
Cross-sectional survey.
Baltimore metropolitan area (low health literacy sample) and a national, probability-based online panel-KnowledgePanel (national sample).
Adults 65+ with low health literacy measured using a single-question screen (low health literacy sample, n = 113) and KnowledgePanel members 65+ who completed survey about colorectal cancer screening (national sample, n = 441).
The same survey was administered to both groups. Using the best-worst scaling method, we assessed relative preferences for 13 different ways to explain stopping screening colonoscopies. We used conditional logistic regression to quantify the relative preference for each explanation, where a higher preference weight indicates stronger preference. We analyzed each sample separately, then compared the two samples using Spearman's correlation coefficient, the likelihood ratio test to assess for overall differences between the two sets of preference weights, and the Wald test to assess differences in preference weights for each individual phrases.
The responses from the two samples were highly correlated (Spearman's coefficient 0.92, p < 0.0001). The most preferred phrase to explain stopping screening colonoscopy was "Your other health issues should take priority" in both groups. The three least preferred options were also the same for both groups, with the least preferred being "The doctor does not give an explanation." The explanation that referred to "quality of life" was more preferred by the low health literacy group whereas explanations that mentioned "unlikely to benefit" and "high risk for harms" were more preferred by the national survey group (all p < 0.001).
Among two different populations of older adults with different health literacy levels, the preferred strategies for clinicians to discuss stopping screening colonoscopies were highly correlated. Our results can inform effective communication about stopping screening colonoscopies in older adults across different health literacy levels.
背景/目的:许多老年人接受了不必要的筛查结肠镜检查。我们之前进行了一项使用全国在线面板的调查,以评估老年人对临床医生如何讨论停止筛查结肠镜检查的偏好。我们试图通过将这些结果与一组健康素养较低的老年人样本进行比较来评估这些结果的普遍性。
横断面调查。
巴尔的摩大都市区(健康素养较低的样本)和一个全国性的、基于概率的在线面板-知识面板(全国样本)。
使用单一问题屏幕测量的 65 岁以上有低健康素养的成年人(健康素养较低的样本,n=113)和完成结直肠癌筛查调查的知识面板 65 岁以上成员(全国样本,n=441)。
向两组都提供了相同的调查。使用最佳最差标度法,我们评估了 13 种不同的解释停止筛查结肠镜检查的相对偏好。我们使用条件逻辑回归来量化对每种解释的相对偏好,其中较高的偏好权重表示更强的偏好。我们分别对每个样本进行分析,然后使用 Spearman 相关系数比较两个样本,使用似然比检验评估两组偏好权重的总体差异,以及 Wald 检验评估每个短语的偏好权重差异。
两个样本的反应高度相关(Spearman 系数 0.92,p<0.0001)。两个组中最受欢迎的解释停止筛查结肠镜检查的短语都是“您的其他健康问题应该优先考虑”。最不受欢迎的三个选项也是两个组共有的,最不受欢迎的是“医生没有解释”。提到“生活质量”的解释更受健康素养较低的组偏好,而提到“不太可能受益”和“高危害风险”的解释则更受全国调查组偏好(均 p<0.001)。
在两个不同健康素养水平的老年人群体中,临床医生讨论停止筛查结肠镜检查的首选策略高度相关。我们的研究结果可以为不同健康素养水平的老年人提供关于停止筛查结肠镜检查的有效沟通。