Monroe C M, Geraci M, Larsen C A, West D S
Arnold School of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior University of South Carolina Columbia SC USA.
Arnold School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of South Carolina Columbia SC USA.
Obes Sci Pract. 2019 Jun 27;5(4):354-365. doi: 10.1002/osp4.352. eCollection 2019 Aug.
Harnessing social support from existing social ties represents a key weight control practice. This trial evaluated an intervention that provided health-promoting technologies for leveraging the influence of existing social ties.
Volunteers ( = 36) with a body mass index between 25 and 55 kg m were randomized to a 16-week, in-person, technology-supported behavioural weight-loss treatment (standard behavioural treatment) or the same programme supplemented by providing self-selected members of participants' social networks with a digital body-weight scale and Fitbit Zip physical activity tracker (ENHANCED).
Average weight losses from baseline to 16 weeks did not significantly differ between groups (standard behavioural treatment, 5.30%, SD =3.93%; ENHANCED, 5.96%, SD = 5.19%, = 0.63). By the 1-year follow-up, standard behavioural treatment had lost 5.63%, SD = 8.14% of baseline weight versus 4.73%, SD = 9.43% for ENHANCED ( = 0.82). ENHANCED reported self-weighing on more days than did standard behavioural treatment ( = 0.03). Most participants reported high programme satisfaction. Similar improvements were observed in perceived social support for diet and exercise from baseline to 16 weeks in both groups (s < 0.05) but regressed by 1 year (s < 0.01).
Although feasible to implement, this technology-based, social support approach failed to enhance outcomes of a face-to-face, group-based behavioural weight-loss treatment.
利用现有社会关系中的社会支持是一项关键的体重控制措施。本试验评估了一种干预措施,该措施提供促进健康的技术,以利用现有社会关系的影响。
将体重指数在25至55kg/m之间的36名志愿者随机分为两组,一组接受为期16周的面对面、技术支持的行为减肥治疗(标准行为治疗),另一组接受相同的项目,但为参与者社交网络中自行选择的成员提供数字体重秤和Fitbit Zip身体活动追踪器(增强组)。
从基线到16周,两组的平均体重减轻没有显著差异(标准行为治疗组为5.30%,标准差=3.93%;增强组为5.96%,标准差=5.19%,P=0.63)。到1年随访时,标准行为治疗组的体重减轻了基线体重的5.63%,标准差=8.14%,而增强组为4.73%,标准差=9.43%(P=0.82)。增强组报告的自我称重天数多于标准行为治疗组(P=0.03)。大多数参与者对该项目表示高度满意。两组从基线到16周在饮食和运动方面的感知社会支持都有类似改善(P<0.05),但到1年时有所下降(P<0.01)。
尽管这种基于技术的社会支持方法实施起来可行,但未能提高面对面、基于小组的行为减肥治疗的效果。