Mason Casey, Ellis Peter G, Lokay Kathy, Barry Amanda, Dickson Natalie, Page Ray, Polite Blase, Salgia Ravi, Savin Michael, Shamah Corey, Socinski Mark A
Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL.
UPMC Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Clin Pathw. 2018 Jan-Feb;4(1):49-54. doi: 10.25270/jcp.2018.02.00001.
Despite clear clinical benefit and guideline recommendations for predictive biomarker testing and subsequent first-line targeted therapy treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is evidence that testing has not been widely embraced in the clinical setting. This study uses clinical pathways to understand biomarker testing patterns and ensuing first-line treatment decisions. Data of patients with metastatic NSCLC were analyzed for testing rates and treatment selection at 7 cancer programs using data input by providers into the pathways software. Findings were analyzed by type of provider (community or academic). Among providers using clinical pathways, biomarker testing rates were high and appropriate selection of targeted therapy was observed. Clinical pathways can act as a tool to assist oncology practices to promote testing of key biomarkers and subsequent selection of appropriate therapy.
尽管非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者进行预测性生物标志物检测及后续一线靶向治疗具有明确的临床益处且有指南推荐,但有证据表明该检测在临床环境中尚未得到广泛应用。本研究采用临床路径来了解生物标志物检测模式及随后的一线治疗决策。利用提供者输入路径软件的数据,分析了7个癌症项目中转移性NSCLC患者的检测率和治疗选择情况。研究结果按提供者类型(社区或学术机构)进行分析。在使用临床路径的提供者中,生物标志物检测率较高,且观察到靶向治疗的选择恰当。临床路径可作为一种工具,协助肿瘤学实践促进关键生物标志物的检测及随后选择合适的治疗方法。