Yüksel Selcen, Elhan Atilla Halil, Gökmen Derya, Küçükdeveci Ayşe Adile, Kutlay Şehim
Department of Biostatistics, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Biostatistics, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Apr 2;64(4):300-307. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2018.2796. eCollection 2018 Dec.
This study aims to evaluate whether items in the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) function differently according to age, sex, and duration of pain using the Mixed Rasch Model (MRM).
The NHP data of patients with low back pain from a previous study was analyzed. To analyze differential item functioning (DIF) within the items of the NHP, the MRM was used. Age, sex, and duration of pain were considered factors which could cause DIF. The most powerful factor to define latent classes derived from the MRM was estimated using the Rasch tree method.
The two-class mixture version of the nominal response model was identified as the best fitting model for the physical mobility, sleep, and social isolation sections. For the physical mobility dimension, some items showed DIF by age and for the social isolation dimension some items showed DIF by sex. For the sleep dimension, latent classes were unable to be explained by age, sex, and duration of pain. Items in other dimensions of the NHP were DIF-free and no items showed DIF according to age, sex, and duration of pain.
The results of this study may shed light on explaining the different response behavior of patients on the items of the NHP. Age and sex were found to be variables affecting item responses of NHP. Contrary to expectations, duration of pain did not cause DIF for any item. From the perspective of DIF, it can be concluded that NHP scale is a robust scale in terms of validity.
本研究旨在使用混合Rasch模型(MRM)评估土耳其版诺丁汉健康量表(NHP)中的项目是否根据年龄、性别和疼痛持续时间具有不同的功能。
分析了先前一项研究中腰痛患者的NHP数据。为了分析NHP项目中的差异项目功能(DIF),使用了MRM。年龄、性别和疼痛持续时间被视为可能导致DIF的因素。使用Rasch树方法估计了定义从MRM派生的潜在类别的最有力因素。
名义反应模型的两类混合版本被确定为身体活动、睡眠和社会隔离部分的最佳拟合模型。对于身体活动维度,一些项目显示出年龄导致的DIF,对于社会隔离维度,一些项目显示出性别导致的DIF。对于睡眠维度,潜在类别无法用年龄、性别和疼痛持续时间来解释。NHP其他维度的项目没有DIF,并且没有项目根据年龄、性别和疼痛持续时间显示出DIF。
本研究结果可能有助于解释患者在NHP项目上的不同反应行为。发现年龄和性别是影响NHP项目反应的变量。与预期相反,疼痛持续时间并未导致任何项目出现DIF。从DIF的角度来看,可以得出结论,NHP量表在有效性方面是一个稳健的量表。