• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证世界卫生组织残疾评估表 II(WHODAS-II)在骨关节炎患者中的应用。

Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ankara, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2011 Mar;31(3):339-46. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-1306-8. Epub 2009 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00296-009-1306-8
PMID:20020133
Abstract

The objective of this study is to test the reliability and validity of WHODAS-II (Turkish version) for the assessment of disability in patients with osteoarthritis. This study is designed as follows: the internal construct validity of WHODAS-II in patients with knee osteoarthritis was assessed by Rasch analysis, and external construct validity by association with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP); reliability was tested by internal consistency, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and test-retest ICC. Our study presents the results of 225 outpatients assessed with mean age 58.4 years (SD 11.1) of whom 80.9% were female. Cronbach's α, ICC, and test-retest ICC values for the six subscales of WHODAS-II varied between 0.71 and 0.94, 0.71 and 0.94, and 0.87 and 0.97, respectively. Rasch analysis of WHODAS-II indicated that after adjustment for local dependency, satisfactory fit was achieved. Two separate 'activities' and 'participation' components could also be identified. External construct validity of the scale was confirmed with expected correlations with WOMAC and NHP. This study concludes that WHODAS-II provides a reliable and valid health status instrument for measuring disability and components of 'activities' and 'participation' in patients with osteoarthritis. Thus, it provides the opportunity to model the consequences of disease according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework.

摘要

本研究旨在检验 WHODAS-II(土耳其语版)评估骨关节炎患者残疾的可靠性和有效性。本研究设计如下:通过 Rasch 分析评估 WHODAS-II 在膝骨关节炎患者中的内部结构效度,并通过与西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和诺丁汉健康量表(NHP)的相关性评估外部结构效度;通过内部一致性、组内相关系数(ICC)和重测 ICC 测试可靠性。我们的研究共纳入了 225 名平均年龄为 58.4 岁(标准差为 11.1)的门诊患者,其中 80.9%为女性。WHODAS-II 的六个分量表的 Cronbach's α、ICC 和重测 ICC 值分别在 0.71 到 0.94 之间、0.71 到 0.94 之间和 0.87 到 0.97 之间。WHODAS-II 的 Rasch 分析表明,在调整局部依赖性后,拟合度良好。还可以确定两个单独的“活动”和“参与”分量表。该量表的外部结构效度通过与 WOMAC 和 NHP 的预期相关性得到证实。本研究得出结论,WHODAS-II 为评估骨关节炎患者的残疾以及“活动”和“参与”成分提供了一种可靠和有效的健康状况工具。因此,它为根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类框架对疾病的后果进行建模提供了机会。

相似文献

1
Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis.验证世界卫生组织残疾评估表 II(WHODAS-II)在骨关节炎患者中的应用。
Rheumatol Int. 2011 Mar;31(3):339-46. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-1306-8. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
2
Activities and participation after stroke: validity and reliability of the Turkish version of IMPACT-S questionnaire.脑卒中后活动和参与:土耳其版 IMPACT-S 问卷的效度和信度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun;42(13):1912-1917. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1542038. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
3
The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS-II)在脑卒中中的信度和效度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Feb;35(3):214-20. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.690817. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index in patients with knee osteoarthritis.西大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数简化版阿拉伯语版本在膝骨关节炎患者中的跨文化调适、信度和效度
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(7):689-94. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1055380. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
5
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with multiple sclerosis.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS-II)在多发性硬化症患者中的效度验证。
Mult Scler. 2015 Apr;21(4):448-56. doi: 10.1177/1352458514543732. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
6
Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2" in patients with chronic diseases.验证《世界卫生组织残疾评定量表》(WHODAS-2)在慢性病患者中的适用性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 May 19;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-51.
7
Validation of the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule II Chinese Traditional Version (WHODAS II CT) in persons with disabilities and chronic illnesses for Chinese population.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版中文版(WHODAS II CT)在中国残疾人和慢性病患者中的效度验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1902-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.989336. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
8
Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)在意大利膝关节骨关节炎患者中的可靠性和有效性。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 Aug;11(8):551-60. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00089-x.
9
Reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin-Beck disease.12 项 WHODAS 2.0 量表在大骨节病患者中的信度和效度。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Sep;37(9):1567-1573. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3723-4. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
Validity, reliability, and comparison of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and Lequesne algofunctional index in Turkish patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis.土耳其髋或膝关节骨关节炎患者 WOMAC 骨关节炎指数和 Lequesne algofunctional 指数的有效性、可靠性和比较。
Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Jul;29(7):749-56. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1398-2. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
STRIVE pilot trial: a protocol for a multicentre pragmatic internal pilot randomised controlled trial of Structured TRaining to Improve fitness in a Virtual Environment (STRIVE) before surgery.STRIVE 试验:一项在手术前进行结构化虚拟环境训练改善适应性(STRIVE)的多中心实用内部先导随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 7;14(11):e093710. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093710.
2
Effectiveness of Gamification in Knee Replacement Rehabilitation: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial With a Qualitative Approach.游戏化在膝关节置换康复中的有效性:一项采用定性方法的随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Nov 28;11(11):e38434. doi: 10.2196/38434.
3

本文引用的文献

1
WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS II)与中风患者及其亲属。
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(11):855-64. doi: 10.1080/09638280802355262.
2
Formalizing dimension and response violations of local independence in the unidimensional Rasch model.形式化一维拉施模型中局部独立性的维度和反应违背情况。
J Appl Meas. 2008;9(3):200-15.
3
The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?风湿病学中的拉施测量模型:它是什么以及为何使用它?何时应应用该模型,在一篇拉施模型论文中应关注哪些方面?
Factor Structure of an ICF-Based Measure of Activity and Participations for Adults in Taiwan's Disability Eligibility Determination System.
台湾残疾资格认定系统中基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的成人活动与参与度测量的因素结构
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 May 13;3:879898. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.879898. eCollection 2022.
4
PREPARE trial: a protocol for a multicentre randomised trial of frailty-focused preoperative exercise to decrease postoperative complication rates and disability scores.PREPARE 试验:一项针对以虚弱为重点的术前运动以降低术后并发症发生率和残疾评分的多中心随机试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 8;12(8):e064165. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064165.
5
Evidence for validity of the Swedish self-rated 36-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with mental disorders: a multi-centre cross-sectional study using Rasch analysis.瑞典自评36项版世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在精神障碍患者中的效度证据:一项使用拉施分析的多中心横断面研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 May 8;6(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00449-8.
6
Quality of life after colorectal surgery: A prospective study of patients compared with their spouses.结直肠手术后的生活质量:一项将患者与其配偶进行比较的前瞻性研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Sep 27;13(9):1050-1062. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.1050.
7
Functioning in the fibromyalgia syndrome: validity and reliability of the WHODAS 2.0.纤维肌痛综合征中的功能障碍:WHODAS 2.0 的有效性和可靠性。
Adv Rheumatol. 2021 Sep 16;61(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s42358-021-00216-1.
8
Is it possible to develop a new measurement tool to assess the functional status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?是否有可能开发一种新的测量工具来评估类风湿性关节炎患者的功能状态?
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 May 25;67(2):233-241. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2021.6887. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.有截肢风险的成年人自我报告的残疾、疼痛和伤口相关问题:使用世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 进行的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 15;16(6):e0253288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253288. eCollection 2021.
10
An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0).采用 RASCH 模型对德国 12 项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS 2.0)进行项目分析。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2929-2938. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02872-8. Epub 2021 May 20.
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec 15;57(8):1358-62. doi: 10.1002/art.23108.
4
Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODASII)在康复患者中的心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2007 Nov;16(9):1521-31. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9259-4. Epub 2007 Sep 9.
5
Activity limitations in the lower extremities in patients with osteoarthritis: the modifying effects of illness perceptions and mental health.骨关节炎患者下肢的活动受限:疾病认知和心理健康的调节作用
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Nov;14(11):1104-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.04.011. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
6
Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index.WOMAC骨关节炎指数土耳其语版本的可接受性、可靠性、有效性及反应性
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Jan;13(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.10.010.
7
ICF Core Sets for osteoarthritis.骨关节炎的国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组合
J Rehabil Med. 2004 Jul(44 Suppl):75-80. doi: 10.1080/16501960410015498.
8
Disability in depression and back pain: evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) in a primary care setting.抑郁症和背痛中的残疾情况:在初级保健机构中对世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHO DAS II)的评估
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Jun;56(6):507-14. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00051-9.
9
Linking osteoarthritis-specific health-status measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).将骨关节炎特异性健康状况测量指标与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)相联系。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 Jul;11(7):519-23. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00086-4.
10
Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.采用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版对强直性脊柱炎患者的残疾情况进行评估。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Feb;62(2):140-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.2.140.