School of Nursing, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, Shandong 271016, China.
School of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University &Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, Shandong Province, 271016, China.
Public Health. 2019 Oct;175:90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
Frailty is considered to be one of the risk factors of disability. However, the results of original reported studies are not consistent with respect to the frailty and incidence of disability, and previously published meta-analyses have also shown inconsistent results. This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between the different stages of frailty and the incidence of disability by examining updated overall trends in community-dwelling elders.
Cohort studies in English or Chinese based on associations between frailty and incident disability risks that were published from 2000 until the current date were researched using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases.
The Q test and I statistic were used to examine between-study heterogeneity. Random-effect models were adopted to synthesize the results based on the study heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to explore the possible sources of between-study heterogeneity based on the characteristics of participants.
Eighteen cohort studies with 88,906 participants were included in our meta-analyses. Compared with the non-frailty category, the combined relative risks (RRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the disability were 1.66 (1.49-1.85) and 2.53 (2.01-3.14) for the category of prefrailty and frailty, respectively. Results suggested that the incident risk of disability at follow-up times <5 (RR = 3.19, 95% CI = 2.25-4.53) was significantly higher than for follow-up times ≥5 in the frailty category (RR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.55-2.56). The risk in a sample size of ≥1000 (RR = 2.78, 95% CI = 2.04-3.14) was significantly higher than that when the sample size was <1000 (RR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.53-2.37) in the frailty group. Compared with a value adjusted for comorbidity, the unadjusted comorbidity was significantly higher in the prefrailty category (1.90 vs. 1.52). Compared with a value adjusted for education, the unadjusted education was significantly higher in the prefrailty category (1.81 vs. 1.46). No publication bias was observed.
The overall meta-analysis confirms that frailty has significantly increased the incident risk of disability. Frail, elderly people are at the highest risk of future disability and may be adequate candidates for taking part in prevention and intervention programs.
衰弱被认为是残疾的一个风险因素。然而,原始报告研究的结果在衰弱和残疾的发生率方面并不一致,以前发表的荟萃分析也显示出不一致的结果。本荟萃分析旨在通过检查社区居住老年人的最新总体趋势,研究不同阶段的衰弱与残疾发生率之间的关系。
本研究检索了 2000 年至目前发表的基于衰弱与新发残疾风险相关性的英文或中文队列研究,使用了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 CENTRAL 数据库。
使用 Q 检验和 I 统计量评估研究间的异质性。根据研究异质性,采用随机效应模型综合结果。还进行了亚组分析,根据参与者的特征,探索研究间异质性的可能来源。
荟萃分析纳入了 18 项队列研究,共 88906 名参与者。与非衰弱组相比,衰弱前期和衰弱组残疾的合并相对风险(RR)(95%置信区间[CI])分别为 1.66(1.49-1.85)和 2.53(2.01-3.14)。结果表明,随访时间<5 时残疾的发生率风险(RR=3.19,95%CI=2.25-4.53)明显高于衰弱组随访时间≥5 时的风险(RR=2.00,95%CI=1.55-2.56)。样本量≥1000 时的风险(RR=2.78,95%CI=2.04-3.14)明显高于样本量<1000 时的风险(RR=1.91,95%CI=1.53-2.37)。在衰弱组中,未调整共病与调整共病相比,RR 为 1.90(95%CI=1.52-2.37);与调整教育相比,未调整教育RR 为 1.81(95%CI=1.46-2.24)。未观察到发表偏倚。
总的荟萃分析证实,衰弱显著增加了残疾的发生率风险。虚弱的老年人未来残疾的风险最高,可能是参与预防和干预计划的合适人选。