Laboratório de Ecologia Química de Insetos Vetores, Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0186696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186696. eCollection 2017.
Odour-baited technologies are increasingly considered for effective monitoring of mosquito populations and for the evaluation of vector control interventions. The BG-Malaria trap (BGM), which is an upside-down variant of the widely used BG-Sentinel trap (BGS), has been demonstrated to be effective to sample the Brazilian malaria vector, Anopheles darlingi. We evaluated the BGM as an improved method for sampling the African malaria vectors, Anopheles arabiensis. Experiments were conducted inside a large semi-field cage to compare trapping efficiencies of BGM and BGS traps, both baited with the synthetic attractant, Ifakara blend, supplemented with CO2. We then compared BGMs baited with either of four synthetic mosquito lures, Ifakara blend, Mbita blend, BG-lure or CO2, and an unbaited BGM. Lastly, we compared BGMs baited with the Ifakara blend dispensed via either nylon strips, BG cartridges (attractant-infused microcapsules encased in cylindrical plastic cartridge) or BG sachets (attractant-infused microcapsules encased in plastic sachets). All tests were conducted between 6P.M. and 7A.M., with 200-600 laboratory-reared An. arabiensis released nightly in the test chamber. The median number of An. arabiensis caught by the BGM per night was 83, IQR:(73.5-97.75), demonstrating clear superiority over BGS (median catch = 32.5 (25.25-37.5)). Compared to unbaited controls, BGMs baited with Mbita blend caught most mosquitoes (45 (29.5-70.25)), followed by BGMs baited with CO2 (42.5 (27.5-64)), Ifakara blend (31 (9.25-41.25)) and BG lure (16 (4-22)). BGM caught 51 (29.5-72.25) mosquitoes/night, when the attractants were dispensed using BG-Cartridges, compared to BG-Sachet (29.5 (24.75-40.5)), and nylon strips (27 (19.25-38.25)), in all cases being significantly superior to unbaited controls (p < 000.1). The findings demonstrate potential of the BGM as a sampling tool for African malaria vectors over the standard BGS trap. Its efficacy can be optimized by selecting appropriate odour baits and odour-dispensing systems.
气味诱捕技术越来越被认为是有效监测蚊虫种群和评估病媒控制干预措施的手段。BG-Malaria 诱捕器(BGM)是广泛使用的 BG-Sentinel 诱捕器(BGS)的倒置变体,已被证明对采集巴西疟疾媒介按蚊 darlingi 有效。我们评估了 BGM 作为一种改进的方法,用于采集非洲疟疾媒介按蚊 arabiensis。实验在一个大型半野外笼中进行,比较了 BGM 和 BGS 诱捕器的诱捕效率,两者均用合成引诱剂 Ifakara 混合物诱捕,并补充 CO2。然后,我们比较了用四种合成蚊引诱剂中的任何一种诱捕的 BGM,即 Ifakara 混合物、Mbita 混合物、BG 引诱剂或 CO2,以及未诱捕的 BGM。最后,我们比较了用尼龙条、BG 药筒(装有圆柱形塑料药筒的诱芯浸膏)或 BG 袋(装有塑料袋的诱芯浸膏)分配的 Ifakara 混合物诱捕的 BGM。所有测试均在下午 6 点至 7 点之间进行,每晚在测试室内释放 200-600 只实验室饲养的按蚊 arabiensis。BGM 每晚捕获的按蚊 arabiensis 中位数为 83,IQR:(73.5-97.75),明显优于 BGS(捕获中位数=32.5(25.25-37.5))。与未诱捕的对照相比,用 Mbita 混合物诱捕的 BGM 捕获的蚊子最多(45(29.5-70.25)),其次是用 CO2 诱捕的 BGM(42.5(27.5-64))、用 Ifakara 混合物诱捕的 BGM(31(9.25-41.25))和用 BG 引诱剂诱捕的 BGM(16(4-22))。当使用 BG 药筒分配引诱剂时,BGM 每夜捕获 51(29.5-72.25)只蚊子,而 BG 袋(29.5(24.75-40.5))和尼龙条(27(19.25-38.25))则分别为 29.5(24.75-40.5)和 27(19.25-38.25),在所有情况下均明显优于未诱捕的对照(p<000.1)。研究结果表明,BGM 作为一种采集非洲疟疾媒介的工具,具有优于标准 BGS 诱捕器的潜力。通过选择适当的气味诱饵和气味分配系统,可以优化其功效。