Suppr超能文献

利用桡动脉血压波形的多拍分析估计心输出量:以间歇性肺动脉热稀释法作为参考方法的不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的方法比较研究。

Cardiac output estimation using multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform: a method comparison study in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery using intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution as the reference method.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Aug;34(4):649-654. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00375-z. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

Abstract

Pulse wave analysis enables stroke volume to be estimated from an arterial blood pressure waveform. Multi-beat analysis is a novel pulse wave analysis method. We aimed to investigate cardiac output (CO) estimations using multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) using intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution (PATD) as the reference method. This was a prospective clinical method comparison study. In 58 patients, we measured CO using PATD (PATD-CO; reference method) and simultaneously recorded the radial arterial blood pressure waveform that we used for off-line estimation of CO based on multi-beat analysis (MBA-CO; test method) using the Argos CO monitor (Retia Medical; Valhalla, NY, USA). The final analysis was performed using 572 paired CO measurements. We performed Bland-Altman analysis accounting for multiple observations per patient. To describe the ability of the test method to track changes in CO over time we computed four-quadrant plots using a central exclusion zone of 15% and calculated the concordance rate. Mean PATD-CO was 4.13 ± 1.26 L/min and mean MBA-CO was 4.31 ± 1.25 L/min. The mean of the differences between PATD-CO and MBA-CO was - 0.20 L/min with a standard deviation of ± 1.14 L/min and 95% limits of agreement of - 2.48 to + 2.08 L/min. The concordance rate for CO changes between PATD-CO and MBA-CO was 89%. CO estimations using multi-beat analysis (Argos monitor) show reasonable agreement and trending ability compared with PATD-CO as the reference method in adult patients during OPCAB.

摘要

脉搏波分析可根据动脉血压波形估计每搏输出量。多节拍分析是一种新的脉搏波分析方法。我们旨在研究使用间歇肺动脉热稀释法(PATD)作为参考方法的非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)患者桡动脉血压波形的多节拍分析来估计心输出量(CO)。这是一项前瞻性临床方法比较研究。在 58 例患者中,我们使用 PATD(PATD-CO;参考方法)测量 CO,并同时记录桡动脉血压波形,我们使用 Argos CO 监测仪(Retia Medical;纽约州瓦哈拉)对其进行离线基于多节拍分析的 CO 估计(MBA-CO;测试方法)。最终分析使用了 572 对配对的 CO 测量值。我们进行了 Bland-Altman 分析,考虑了每位患者的多次观察。为了描述测试方法随时间跟踪 CO 变化的能力,我们使用中央排除区为 15%的四象限图进行了计算,并计算了一致性率。PATD-CO 的平均值为 4.13±1.26 L/min,MBA-CO 的平均值为 4.31±1.25 L/min。PATD-CO 和 MBA-CO 之间差值的平均值为 -0.20 L/min,标准差为±1.14 L/min,95%一致性界限为 -2.48 至 +2.08 L/min。PATD-CO 和 MBA-CO 之间 CO 变化的一致性率为 89%。在 OPCAB 期间,与作为参考方法的 PATD-CO 相比,使用多节拍分析(Argos 监测仪)进行 CO 估计显示出合理的一致性和趋势能力。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Invasive and noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring options for cardiac surgery.心脏手术的有创和无创心血管监测方法
JTCVS Open. 2022 Apr 11;10:256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.02.028. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
What is new in hemodynamic monitoring and management?血流动力学监测与管理方面有哪些新进展?
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Apr;36(2):305-313. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00848-8. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

2
Alternatives to the Swan-Ganz catheter.替代 Swan-Ganz 导管的方法。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):730-741. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5187-8. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
Pressure Waveform Analysis.压力波型分析。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):1930-1933. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002527.
7
Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.危重症患者的微创血流动力学监测。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Sep;42(9):1350-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4375-7. Epub 2016 May 7.
8
Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update.微创或无创心输出量测量:最新进展
J Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):461-80. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2154-9. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验