• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cardiac output estimation using multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform: a method comparison study in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery using intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution as the reference method.利用桡动脉血压波形的多拍分析估计心输出量:以间歇性肺动脉热稀释法作为参考方法的不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的方法比较研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Aug;34(4):649-654. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00375-z. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
2
Cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution: a method comparison study in patients treated in the intensive care unit after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.应用桡动脉血压波形的多拍分析和间歇性肺动脉热稀释法评估心输出量:在非体外循环冠状动脉旁路手术后入住重症监护病房的患者中的方法比较研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Aug;34(4):643-648. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00374-0. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Cardiac output estimation by pulse wave analysis using the pressure recording analytical method and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution: A method comparison study after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.使用压力记录分析法和间歇性肺动脉热稀释法通过脉搏波分析评估心输出量:非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后的方法比较研究
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Oct;37(10):920-925. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001227.
4
Comparison of accuracy of two uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitors in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients using pulmonary artery catheter-thermodilution as a reference.比较两种未经校准的脉搏轮廓心输出量监测仪在非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中的准确性,以肺动脉导管热稀释法作为参考。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul 10;21(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01415-5.
5
Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术中经肺热稀释法、脉搏轮廓分析法和肺动脉热稀释法测量心输出量的比较:单一三级中心心血管麻醉登记处的亚组分析
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Dec;30(6):771-782. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9784-6. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
6
The influence of acute pulmonary hypertension on cardiac output measurements: calibrated pulse contour analysis, transpulmonary and pulmonary artery thermodilution against a modified Fick method in an animal model.急性肺动脉高压对心输出量测量的影响:在动物模型中,采用校准脉搏轮廓分析、经肺热稀释法和肺动脉热稀释法与改良Fick法进行对比研究。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Jul;121(1):99-107. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000655.
7
Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.基于脉搏波传播时间的非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中连续心输出量的估计:与经肺热稀释法的比较
J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Apr;31(2):361-370. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9853-5. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
8
Evaluation of agreement and trending ability between transpulmonary thermodilution and calibrated pulse contour and pulse power cardiac output monitoring methods against pulmonary artery thermodilution in anesthetized dogs.在麻醉犬中,评估经肺热稀释法与校准脉搏轮廓和脉搏功率心输出量监测方法相对于肺动脉热稀释法的一致性和趋势分析能力。
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2016 Jul;26(4):531-40. doi: 10.1111/vec.12439. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.在广泛的心输出量值范围内,使用LiDCOrapid™和FloTrac/Vigileo™测量心输出量的可靠性。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Aug;31(4):709-716. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9896-7. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
10
Agreement between cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of arterial blood pressure waveforms and continuous thermodilution in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients.多搏动脉血压波形分析与连续热稀释法在心脏术后重症监护病房心输出量评估中的一致性。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Apr;37(2):559-565. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00924-z. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Occurrence of Low Cardiac Index During Normotensive Periods in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study Using Continuous Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring.心脏手术正常血压期低心排血量的发生情况:一项使用连续无创心输出量监测的前瞻性队列研究
Anesth Analg. 2025 Jan 1;140(1):77-86. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007206. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
Bias, trending ability and diagnostic performance of a non-calibrated multi-beat analysis continuous cardiac output monitor to identify fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.未校准的多搏分析连续心输出量监测仪在识别危重症患者液体反应性方面的偏倚、趋势分析能力及诊断性能
Crit Care Resusc. 2024 Jun 21;26(2):108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.04.003. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Agreement between cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of arterial blood pressure waveforms and continuous thermodilution in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients.多搏动脉血压波形分析与连续热稀释法在心脏术后重症监护病房心输出量评估中的一致性。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Apr;37(2):559-565. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00924-z. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
4
Invasive and noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring options for cardiac surgery.心脏手术的有创和无创心血管监测方法
JTCVS Open. 2022 Apr 11;10:256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.02.028. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
What is new in hemodynamic monitoring and management?血流动力学监测与管理方面有哪些新进展?
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Apr;36(2):305-313. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00848-8. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
6
[Comparison of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, and plethysmographic variability index in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy].小儿开颅手术中脉压变异、每搏量变异与体积描记法变异指数的比较
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Oct 18;53(5):946-951. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.05.023.
7
Comparison of accuracy of two uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitors in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients using pulmonary artery catheter-thermodilution as a reference.比较两种未经校准的脉搏轮廓心输出量监测仪在非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中的准确性,以肺动脉导管热稀释法作为参考。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul 10;21(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01415-5.
8
Estimation of cardiac output variations induced by hemodynamic interventions using multi-beat analysis of arterial waveform: a comparative off-line study with transesophageal Doppler method during non-cardiac surgery.使用动脉波形多搏分析评估血流动力学干预引起的心输出量变化:非心脏手术期间与经食管多普勒法的离线比较研究
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Apr;36(2):501-510. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00679-z. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
9
Technological Assessment and Objective Evaluation of Minimally Invasive and Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring Systems.微创和无创心输出量监测系统的技术评估和客观评价。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Oct 1;133(4):921-928. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003483.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System in Comparison With the Intermittent Bolus Thermodilution Method in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.心脏手术患者中第四代FloTrac/Vigileo系统与间歇性推注热稀释法的比较评估
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Apr;33(4):953-960. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
Alternatives to the Swan-Ganz catheter.替代 Swan-Ganz 导管的方法。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):730-741. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5187-8. Epub 2018 May 3.
3
Cardiac output monitoring: how to choose the optimal method for the individual patient.心输出量监测:如何为个体患者选择最佳方法。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Jun;24(3):165-172. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000492.
4
Pressure Waveform Analysis.压力波型分析。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):1930-1933. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002527.
5
Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.体外循环前后使用第四版FloTrac系统测量心输出量的评估。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Oct;32(5):807-815. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0071-6. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
6
Methodology of method comparison studies evaluating the validity of cardiac output monitors: a stepwise approach and checklist.评估心输出量监测器有效性的方法比较研究的方法学:逐步方法和检查表。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):750-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew094.
7
Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.危重症患者的微创血流动力学监测。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Sep;42(9):1350-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4375-7. Epub 2016 May 7.
8
Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update.微创或无创心输出量测量:最新进展
J Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):461-80. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2154-9. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
9
Tracking Changes in Cardiac Output: Statistical Considerations on the 4-Quadrant Plot and the Polar Plot Methodology.监测心输出量的变化:四象限图和极坐标图方法的统计学考虑。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Aug;121(2):514-24. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000725.
10
Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12.高危患者围手术期心血管监测:12项共识
Crit Care. 2015 May 8;19(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0932-7.

利用桡动脉血压波形的多拍分析估计心输出量:以间歇性肺动脉热稀释法作为参考方法的不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的方法比较研究。

Cardiac output estimation using multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform: a method comparison study in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery using intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution as the reference method.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Aug;34(4):649-654. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00375-z. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10877-019-00375-z
PMID:31456072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7367911/
Abstract

Pulse wave analysis enables stroke volume to be estimated from an arterial blood pressure waveform. Multi-beat analysis is a novel pulse wave analysis method. We aimed to investigate cardiac output (CO) estimations using multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) using intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution (PATD) as the reference method. This was a prospective clinical method comparison study. In 58 patients, we measured CO using PATD (PATD-CO; reference method) and simultaneously recorded the radial arterial blood pressure waveform that we used for off-line estimation of CO based on multi-beat analysis (MBA-CO; test method) using the Argos CO monitor (Retia Medical; Valhalla, NY, USA). The final analysis was performed using 572 paired CO measurements. We performed Bland-Altman analysis accounting for multiple observations per patient. To describe the ability of the test method to track changes in CO over time we computed four-quadrant plots using a central exclusion zone of 15% and calculated the concordance rate. Mean PATD-CO was 4.13 ± 1.26 L/min and mean MBA-CO was 4.31 ± 1.25 L/min. The mean of the differences between PATD-CO and MBA-CO was - 0.20 L/min with a standard deviation of ± 1.14 L/min and 95% limits of agreement of - 2.48 to + 2.08 L/min. The concordance rate for CO changes between PATD-CO and MBA-CO was 89%. CO estimations using multi-beat analysis (Argos monitor) show reasonable agreement and trending ability compared with PATD-CO as the reference method in adult patients during OPCAB.

摘要

脉搏波分析可根据动脉血压波形估计每搏输出量。多节拍分析是一种新的脉搏波分析方法。我们旨在研究使用间歇肺动脉热稀释法(PATD)作为参考方法的非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)患者桡动脉血压波形的多节拍分析来估计心输出量(CO)。这是一项前瞻性临床方法比较研究。在 58 例患者中,我们使用 PATD(PATD-CO;参考方法)测量 CO,并同时记录桡动脉血压波形,我们使用 Argos CO 监测仪(Retia Medical;纽约州瓦哈拉)对其进行离线基于多节拍分析的 CO 估计(MBA-CO;测试方法)。最终分析使用了 572 对配对的 CO 测量值。我们进行了 Bland-Altman 分析,考虑了每位患者的多次观察。为了描述测试方法随时间跟踪 CO 变化的能力,我们使用中央排除区为 15%的四象限图进行了计算,并计算了一致性率。PATD-CO 的平均值为 4.13±1.26 L/min,MBA-CO 的平均值为 4.31±1.25 L/min。PATD-CO 和 MBA-CO 之间差值的平均值为 -0.20 L/min,标准差为±1.14 L/min,95%一致性界限为 -2.48 至 +2.08 L/min。PATD-CO 和 MBA-CO 之间 CO 变化的一致性率为 89%。在 OPCAB 期间,与作为参考方法的 PATD-CO 相比,使用多节拍分析(Argos 监测仪)进行 CO 估计显示出合理的一致性和趋势能力。