Shirazikhah Marzieh, Mirabzadeh Arash, Sajjadi Homeira, Joghataei Mohammad Taghi, Biglarian Akbar, Mohammadi Shahboulaghi Farahnaz, Sharif Nia Hamid, Allen Kelly A
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Psychiatry Department, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Apr 24;33:34. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.34. eCollection 2019.
Access to rehabilitation services is considered to be a right for all people. One of the most important indicators for access to rehabilitation services is an individual's general acceptance of rehabilitation. This tool was designed based on relevant studies and experiences of rehabilitation specialists to design a questionnaire to specifically measure patient acceptability of physical rehabilitation services. In this study, an exploratory sequential mixed methods design was used. The first phase included a review of the literature and analysis of relevant studies, focus group discussions, and qualitative content analysis. In the second phase, construct validity was assessed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Also, convergent and divergent validity were measured. Reliability was evaluated by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega) and construct reliability. Statistical procedures were calculated by SPSS-AMOS24 and JASP0.9.2 software. A total of 200 questionnaires were completed by members of Iranian Disability Campaign. Three factors and 25 items were identified according to results of the first phase of this study. In the second phase, face validity was confirmed. To assess the content validity ratio, 9 items, with the mean of content validity ratio (CVR) < 0.49, were deleted, while the content validity index (CVI) < 0.79 was revised. The kappa coefficient < 0.6 was fair and scale content validity index (SCVI) under 0.9 was considered appropriate. Results of exploratory factor analysis showed that 48% of the variance of the acceptability of physical rehabilitation services was based on patients' satisfaction, ethical behavior, and patient centered services. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the suitability of the final model. Convergent and divergent validity and reliability of the measure, the Physical Rehabilitation Services Acceptability questionnaire was fulfilled. Findings indicated that the proposed constructs that promoted the Acceptability of Physical Rehabilitation Services Questionnaire had good validity and reliability in participants with physical disabilities.
获得康复服务被视为所有人的一项权利。获得康复服务的最重要指标之一是个人对康复的总体接受度。本工具是根据康复专家的相关研究和经验设计的,旨在设计一份问卷,专门测量患者对物理康复服务的接受度。在本研究中,采用了探索性序列混合方法设计。第一阶段包括文献回顾、相关研究分析、焦点小组讨论和定性内容分析。第二阶段,通过探索性和验证性因素分析评估结构效度。此外,还测量了收敛效度和区分效度。通过内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数和麦克唐纳欧米伽系数)和结构可靠性评估信度。统计程序由SPSS-AMOS24和JASP0.9.2软件计算。伊朗残疾人运动的成员共完成了200份问卷。根据本研究第一阶段的结果,确定了三个因素和25个项目。在第二阶段,确认了表面效度。为了评估内容效度比,删除了9个内容效度比(CVR)均值<0.49的项目,同时对内容效度指数(CVI)<0.79的项目进行了修订。kappa系数<0.6为尚可,量表内容效度指数(SCVI)低于0.9被认为是合适的。探索性因素分析结果表明,物理康复服务接受度方差的48%基于患者满意度、道德行为和以患者为中心的服务。验证性因素分析证实了最终模型的适用性。该物理康复服务接受度量表在收敛效度、区分效度和信度方面均达到要求。研究结果表明,所提出的促进物理康复服务接受度问卷的结构在身体残疾参与者中具有良好的效度和信度。