Khezri Jafar, Heidari Farid, Shamsara Mahdi
Departnent of Animal Biotechnology National Institue of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB), Tehran, Iran.
Iran J Biotechnol. 2018 Aug 11;16(3):e1632. doi: 10.15171/ijb.1632. eCollection 2018 Aug.
Transgenic mice are being considered as invaluable tool in biological sciences towards comprehension of the cause of the genetic diseases. Manipulated embryonic stem (ES) cells are used to produce loss-of-function mutant mice. Microinjection of manipulated ES cells into blastocoel cavity, and morula fusion are the two main techniques in producing transgenic mice. So far, no reports have dealt with the comparison of these two methodologies provide.
The object of this study was to determine advantages and disadvantages of knockout mouse creation protocols.
Both blastocyst microinjection and morula aggregation were implemented to produce chimeric mice and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique were evaluated. For this, embryonic stem cells were transfected with a GFP-expression vector. In blastocyst microinjection technique, first transfected ES cell were cultured and appropriate colonies were selected. The cells were microinjected to blastocoel cavity of the expanded blastocyst. In morula aggregation technique, the transfected ES cell colonies were sandwiched between two naked morulas. After 16 h incubation in a 5% CO at 37 °C the morulas and infected ES cell were aggregated to produce a new morula. All the injected blastocyst and aggregated morulas were transferred to uterus of foster mice. The new born mice were analyzed for chimera confirmation.
Five chimeric mice (21.75%) from morula aggregation and eight chimeric mice (63%) from blastocyst microinjection were born. The results indicated that both techniques can be used to generate chimeric mouse, however the success rate was higher in blastocyst microinjection.
Morula fusion stands out where the required instrumentations are in place. Furthermore, the quality of ES cells plays a prominent role in the success rate. When the cell quality is low the blastocoel microinjection is recommended. The microinjection technique is more effective than morula aggregation.
转基因小鼠被视为生物科学中理解遗传疾病病因的宝贵工具。经操作的胚胎干细胞用于培育功能缺失型突变小鼠。将经操作的胚胎干细胞显微注射到囊胚腔以及桑椹胚融合是培育转基因小鼠的两种主要技术。到目前为止,尚无关于对这两种方法进行比较的报道。
本研究旨在确定基因敲除小鼠创建方案的优缺点。
采用囊胚显微注射和桑椹胚聚集两种方法来培育嵌合小鼠,并评估每种技术的优缺点。为此,用绿色荧光蛋白表达载体转染胚胎干细胞。在囊胚显微注射技术中,首先培养转染后的胚胎干细胞并挑选合适的集落。将细胞显微注射到扩张囊胚的囊胚腔中。在桑椹胚聚集技术中,将转染后的胚胎干细胞集落夹在两个裸桑椹胚之间。在37℃、5%二氧化碳环境中孵育16小时后,将桑椹胚与感染的胚胎干细胞聚集以形成新的桑椹胚。所有注射的囊胚和聚集的桑椹胚均移植到代孕母鼠的子宫中。对新生小鼠进行嵌合体确认分析。
通过桑椹胚聚集产生了5只嵌合小鼠(21.75%),通过囊胚显微注射产生了8只嵌合小鼠(63%)。结果表明,两种技术均可用于生成嵌合小鼠,但囊胚显微注射的成功率更高。
在具备所需仪器的情况下,桑椹胚融合表现突出。此外,胚胎干细胞的质量对成功率起着显著作用。当细胞质量较低时,建议采用囊胚腔显微注射。显微注射技术比桑椹胚聚集更有效。