• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经网络中的深度学习能否改进 QSAR 模型?

Could deep learning in neural networks improve the QSAR models?

机构信息

DEIB, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2019 Sep;30(9):617-642. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2019.1650827. Epub 2019 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1080/1062936X.2019.1650827
PMID:31460798
Abstract

Assessing chemical toxicity is a multidisciplinary process, traditionally involving in vivo, in vitro and in silico tests. Currently, toxicological goal is to reduce new tests on chemicals, exploiting all information yet available. Recent advancements in machine learning and deep neural networks allow computers to automatically mine patterns and learn from data. This technology, applied to (Q)SAR model development, leads to discover by learning the structural-chemical-biological relationships and the emergent properties. Starting from Toxception, a deep neural network predicting activity from the chemical graph image, we designed SmilesNet, a recurrent neural network taking SMILES as the only input. We then integrated the two networks into C-Tox network to make the final classification. Results of our networks, trained on a ~20K molecule dataset with Ames test experimental values, match or even outperform the current state of the art. We also extract knowledge from the networks and compare it with the available mutagenic structural alerts. The advantage over traditional QSAR modelling is that our models automatically extract the features without using descriptors. Nevertheless, the model is successful if large numbers of examples are provided and computation is more complex than in classical methods.

摘要

评估化学毒性是一个多学科的过程,传统上涉及体内、体外和计算测试。目前,毒理学的目标是利用所有现有的信息,减少对新化学品的测试。机器学习和深度神经网络的最新进展使得计算机能够自动挖掘模式并从数据中学习。这项技术应用于(QSAR)模型开发,通过学习结构-化学-生物学关系和涌现性质来发现。从 Toxception 开始,这是一个从化学图形图像预测活性的深度神经网络,我们设计了 SmilesNet,这是一个仅将 SMILES 作为输入的循环神经网络。然后,我们将这两个网络集成到 C-Tox 网络中进行最终分类。我们的网络在一个约 20K 分子数据集上进行训练,使用 Ames 测试的实验值,结果与当前的最先进水平相匹配,甚至超过了。我们还从网络中提取知识,并将其与可用的致突变结构警报进行比较。与传统的 QSAR 建模相比,我们的模型自动提取特征而不使用描述符。然而,如果提供大量的示例,并且计算比经典方法更复杂,那么该模型就是成功的。

相似文献

1
Could deep learning in neural networks improve the QSAR models?神经网络中的深度学习能否改进 QSAR 模型?
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2019 Sep;30(9):617-642. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2019.1650827. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
2
QSAR modeling without descriptors using graph convolutional neural networks: the case of mutagenicity prediction.使用图卷积神经网络的无描述符定量构效关系建模:以致突变性预测为例
Mol Divers. 2021 Aug;25(3):1283-1299. doi: 10.1007/s11030-021-10250-2. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
3
Optimizing machine-learning models for mutagenicity prediction through better feature selection.通过更好的特征选择来优化用于致突变性预测的机器学习模型。
Mutagenesis. 2022 Oct 26;37(3-4):191-202. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geac010.
4
Convolutional neural network based on SMILES representation of compounds for detecting chemical motif.基于化合物 SMILES 表示的卷积神经网络用于检测化学基序。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2018 Dec 31;19(Suppl 19):526. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2523-5.
5
Deep learning for predicting toxicity of chemicals: a mini review.用于预测化学物质毒性的深度学习:一篇综述
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2018;36(4):252-271. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2018.1537563. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
In Silico Prediction of Chemically Induced Mutagenicity: How to Use QSAR Models and Interpret Their Results.化学诱导致突变性的计算机模拟预测:如何使用定量构效关系模型并解读其结果。
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1425:87-105. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3609-0_5.
7
Deep neural networks for human microRNA precursor detection.用于人类 microRNA 前体检测的深度神经网络。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Jan 13;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3339-7.
8
Quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis using deep learning based on a novel molecular image input technique.基于一种新型分子图像输入技术,使用深度学习进行定量构效关系分析。
Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2018 Nov 1;28(20):3400-3403. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
9
Mechanistic Task Groupings Enhance Multitask Deep Learning of Strain-Specific Ames Mutagenicity.机制任务分组增强了针对特定菌株的 Ames 致突变性的多任务深度学习。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2023 Aug 21;36(8):1248-1254. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00385. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
10
Toxicity Prediction Method Based on Multi-Channel Convolutional Neural Network.基于多通道卷积神经网络的毒性预测方法。
Molecules. 2019 Sep 17;24(18):3383. doi: 10.3390/molecules24183383.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging RNA-centric technologies to probe RNA-protein interactions: importance in decoding the life cycle of positive sense single strand RNA viruses and antiviral discovery.用于探测RNA-蛋白质相互作用的新兴RNA中心技术:在解读正链单链RNA病毒生命周期及抗病毒发现中的重要性。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 May 21;15:1580337. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1580337. eCollection 2025.
2
QSAR: Using the Past to Study the Present.QSAR:利用过去研究现在。
Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2834:3-39. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4003-6_1.
3
In silico toxicology: From structure-activity relationships towards deep learning and adverse outcome pathways.
计算机毒理学:从构效关系到深度学习及不良结局途径。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2020 Jul-Aug;10(4):e1475. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1475. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
4
QSAR Methods.定量构效关系方法
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2425:1-26. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1960-5_1.
5
Prediction Models for Agonists and Antagonists of Molecular Initiation Events for Toxicity Pathways Using an Improved Deep-Learning-Based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship System.使用改进的基于深度学习的定量构效关系系统预测毒性途径分子起始事件的激动剂和拮抗剂的模型。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 6;22(19):10821. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910821.
6
Alkaloids in Contemporary Drug Discovery to Meet Global Disease Needs.当代药物研发中的生物碱以满足全球疾病需求。
Molecules. 2021 Jun 22;26(13):3800. doi: 10.3390/molecules26133800.