Molar inclination and surrounding alveolar bone change relative to the design of bone-borne maxillary expanders: .

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the molar inclination and skeletal and alveolar bone changes when comparing tooth bone-borne (MSE) and tissue bone-borne type maxillary expanders (C-expander) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in late adolescence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A sample of 48 late-adolescent patients were divided into two groups according to the type of expander: MSE group (n = 24, age = 19.2 ± 5.9 years) and C-expander group (n = 24, age = 18.1 ± 4.5 years). CBCT scans were taken before treatment and 3 months after expansion. Transverse skeletal and dental expansion, alveolar inclination, tooth axis, buccal alveolar bone height, thickness, dehiscence, and fenestration were evaluated on the maxillary first molar. Paired -test, independent -test, Pearson's chi-square test, and Spearman correlation analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The MSE group produced greater dental expansion ( < .05), whereas skeletal expansion was similar in both groups ( = .859). The C expander group had more alveolar bone inclination change ( < .01), and the MSE group had more buccal tipping of the anchorage teeth ( < .01 or .001). Buccal alveolar bone height loss and thickness changes were greater in the MSE group ( < .01 or <.001). Formation of dehiscences was more frequent in the MSE group ( < .001), whereas for fenestrations, there were no significant differences between the two groups. Buccal bone height loss in the MSE group had a negative correlation with initial buccal bone thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

The incorporation of teeth into bone-borne expanders resulted in an increase in the severity of side effects. For patients in late adolescence, tissue bone-borne expanders offer comparable skeletal effects to tooth bone-borne expanders, with fewer dentoalveolar side effects.