Echarri-Nicolás Javier, González-Olmo María José, Echarri-Lobiondo Pablo, Lagravère Manuel, Romero Martin
Doctoral Program in Health Sciences, International PhD School, Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Orthodontics, University Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Apr 29;17:1877-1886. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S433693. eCollection 2024.
This study compared the insertion and thickness of the cortical bone, the parallelism of the midpalatal suture, and the skeletal transverse dimension using a microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) with those produced by bone-anchored maxillary expander (BAME) in adults.
The sample comprised 18 patients (mean age, 29.9±9.4 years) selected for the MARPE group and 18 (mean age 24.8±6.8 years) selected for the BAME group. Cone-Beam computed tomography scans taken just before and after the expansion.
After treatment, there was a significant palatal depth decrease. In addition, maxillary and mandibular width were increased in both groups. Regarding the cortical bone insertion and cortical bone width, it is shown an increase in both groups but those changes are not significant. However, the anterior suture opening effect occurs more frequently in the BAME than in the MARPE device. There are no differences in the frequency of opening of the midpalatal suture in the cases treated with MARPE and BAME, in both cases the most frequent opening morphology is parallel, independently of midpalatal suture maturation.
There are no differences in the use of MARPE or BAME in the parallelism of the middle palatal suture, the cortical bone insertion, and thickness according to the maturation stages of the midpalatal suture but significantly increases the transverse dimensions of the maxillary skeleton.
本研究比较了成人中使用微型种植体辅助快速腭扩展(MARPE)与骨锚式上颌扩弓器(BAME)时皮质骨的植入情况和厚度、腭中缝的平行度以及骨骼横向尺寸。
样本包括18例入选MARPE组的患者(平均年龄29.9±9.4岁)和18例入选BAME组的患者(平均年龄24.8±6.8岁)。在扩弓前后进行锥形束计算机断层扫描。
治疗后,腭深度显著减小。此外,两组的上颌和下颌宽度均增加。关于皮质骨植入和皮质骨宽度,两组均显示增加,但这些变化不显著。然而,BAME装置比MARPE装置更频繁地出现前缝开口效应。在接受MARPE和BAME治疗的病例中,腭中缝开口频率没有差异,在两种情况下,最常见的开口形态都是平行的,与腭中缝成熟度无关。
根据腭中缝的成熟阶段,在腭中缝的平行度、皮质骨植入和厚度方面,使用MARPE或BAME没有差异,但显著增加了上颌骨骼的横向尺寸。