• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年非正式照料者的在线活动:一项横断面研究的结果

Online activities among elder informal caregivers: Results from a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Reinwand Dominique A, Crutzen Rik, Zank Susanne

机构信息

Rehabilitative Gerontology, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Germany.

Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2018 Jun 5;4:2055207618779715. doi: 10.1177/2055207618779715. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2055207618779715
PMID:31463072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6034351/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The internet can be used as a source to gain information or support during highly demanding circumstances, e.g. providing informal care. While internet use has been studied among older people, less is known about informal caregivers' online behaviour. This study aims to explore differences in internet use regarding online activities between informal caregivers and non-caregivers.

METHODS

We used data of the Dutch Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences panel (2014), including people aged 65 and older ( = 1413). To test differences with regard to 15 common internet activities; descriptive statistics and tests were conducted.

RESULTS

The sample included 1197 participants aged 65 and older, and 325 (27.2%) were identified as informal caregivers. It was found that informal caregivers played more online games ( (1, 1198) = 6.20,  = 0.01), while non-caregivers more often read online news ( (1, 1198) = 4.44,  = 0.04) and were more active on social network websites ( (1, 1198) = 5.07,  = 0.02) compared to their counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Based on a representative sample, the results show that informal caregivers do not use the internet more for information seeking, but more often for playing online games, which may indicate that the internet is used to compensate for stress. Further research is needed to identify how informal caregivers can be supported by online services.

摘要

目的

在诸如提供非正式照料等需求极高的情况下,互联网可作为获取信息或支持的来源。虽然已对老年人的互联网使用情况进行了研究,但对于非正式照料者的在线行为却知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨非正式照料者与非照料者在互联网使用的在线活动方面的差异。

方法

我们使用了荷兰社会科学纵向互联网研究小组(2014年)的数据,其中包括65岁及以上的人群(n = 1413)。为了测试在15种常见互联网活动方面的差异,进行了描述性统计和检验。

结果

样本包括1197名65岁及以上的参与者,其中325人(27.2%)被确定为非正式照料者。研究发现,非正式照料者玩网络游戏的频率更高(χ²(1, 1198) = 6.20,p = 0.01),而非照料者相比之下更常阅读在线新闻(χ²(1, 1198) = 4.44,p = 0.04),并且在社交网站上更活跃(χ²(1, 1198) = 5.07,p = 0.02)。

结论

基于一个具有代表性的样本,结果表明非正式照料者并非更多地利用互联网来寻求信息,而是更经常用于玩网络游戏,这可能表明互联网被用于缓解压力。需要进一步研究以确定在线服务如何能够为非正式照料者提供支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8612/6034351/70dcf92cb8c3/10.1177_2055207618779715-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8612/6034351/70dcf92cb8c3/10.1177_2055207618779715-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8612/6034351/70dcf92cb8c3/10.1177_2055207618779715-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Online activities among elder informal caregivers: Results from a cross-sectional study.老年非正式照料者的在线活动:一项横断面研究的结果
Digit Health. 2018 Jun 5;4:2055207618779715. doi: 10.1177/2055207618779715. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
2
Health-Related Internet Use by Informal Caregivers of Children and Adolescents: An Integrative Literature Review.儿童和青少年非正式照料者与健康相关的互联网使用:一项综合文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 3;18(3):e57. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4124.
3
Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia.远程为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者提供信息、培训和支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD006440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006440.pub3.
4
Internet use by informal caregivers in Chile: An analysis including age and gender perspectives.
Clin Gerontol. 2024 Jan-Dec;47(1):26-38. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2023.2173692. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
5
Managing medications: the role of informal caregivers of older adults and people living with dementia. A review of the literature.管理药物:老年人及痴呆症患者非正式照料者的作用。文献综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Dec;23(23-24):3296-308. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12519. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
6
Predictors of digital support services use by informal caregivers: a cross-sectional comparative survey.非专业照护者使用数字支持服务的预测因素:一项横断面比较调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e059897. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059897.
7
Digital technologies as sources of information for patients and caregivers during COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey.新冠疫情期间作为患者及护理人员信息来源的数字技术:一项横断面调查
Digit Health. 2023 Mar 7;9:20552076231156214. doi: 10.1177/20552076231156214. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Informal Caregivers' Use of Internet-Based Health Resources: An Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.非正式护理人员对基于互联网的健康资源的使用:健康信息国家趋势调查分析
JMIR Aging. 2018 Dec 18;1(2):e11051. doi: 10.2196/11051.
9
Internet usage buffers the effect of loneliness on subjective health among informal caregivers of older adults.
Psychol Health Med. 2025 Feb;30(2):234-251. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2024.2417313. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
10
Online social support groups for informal caregivers of hospice patients with cancer.在线社交支持小组:为癌症晚期姑息治疗患者的非正式照护者提供支持
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Feb;44:101698. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.101698. Epub 2019 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Growth Mindset Intervention's Impact on Positive Response to eHealth for Older Adults With Chronic Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.成长型思维干预对患有慢性病的老年人对电子健康的积极反应的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jul 3;12:e65519. doi: 10.2196/65519.
2
Lifestyle support preferences of patients with cardiovascular diseases: What lifestyle support might work best for whom?心血管疾病患者的生活方式支持偏好:哪种生活方式支持可能对谁最有效?
PEC Innov. 2022 Aug 17;1:100071. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100071. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Older family carers in rural areas: experiences from using caregiver support services based on Information and Communication Technology (ICT).农村地区的老年家庭照顾者:使用基于信息通信技术(ICT)的照顾者支持服务的经验。
Eur J Ageing. 2013 Jan 29;10(3):191-199. doi: 10.1007/s10433-013-0260-1. eCollection 2013 Sep.
2
Personal growth and cognitive complexity in caregivers of patients with dementia.痴呆症患者照料者的个人成长与认知复杂性
Eur J Ageing. 2008 Aug 26;5(3):203-214. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0090-8. eCollection 2008 Sep.
3
Effectiveness of Internet-Based Interventions for the Prevention of Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
基于互联网的干预措施预防精神障碍的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Aug 17;3(3):e38. doi: 10.2196/mental.6061.
4
Reported burden on informal caregivers of ICU survivors: a literature review.重症监护病房幸存者的非正式护理人员所报告的负担:一项文献综述。
Crit Care. 2016 Jan 21;20:16. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1185-9.
5
ICT Learning by Older Adults and Their Attitudes toward Computer Use.老年人的信息通信技术学习及其对计算机使用的态度。
Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2015;2015:849308. doi: 10.1155/2015/849308. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
6
Health and wellbeing in informal caregivers and non-caregivers: a comparative cross-sectional study of the Swedish general population.非正式照料者和非照料者的健康与幸福:瑞典普通人群的比较横断面研究
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Jul 29;13:109. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0309-2.
7
Informal caregiving and its impact on health: a reappraisal from population-based studies.非正式照料及其对健康的影响:基于人群研究的重新评估
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):309-19. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu177. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
8
A web-based psychoeducational program for informal caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial.一项针对阿尔茨海默病患者非正式照料者的基于网络的心理教育项目:一项试点随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 12;17(5):e117. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3717.
9
Understanding Internet Use Among Dementia Caregivers: Results of Secondary Data Analysis Using the US Caregiver Survey Data.了解痴呆症照顾者的互联网使用情况:使用美国照顾者调查数据进行二次数据分析的结果
Interact J Med Res. 2015 Feb 23;4(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3127.
10
Effectiveness of an Internet intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia: results of a randomized controlled trial.一项针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的互联网干预措施的有效性:一项随机对照试验的结果
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 13;10(2):e0116622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116622. eCollection 2015.