• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对阿尔茨海默病患者非正式照料者的基于网络的心理教育项目:一项试点随机对照试验。

A web-based psychoeducational program for informal caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Cristancho-Lacroix Victoria, Wrobel Jérémy, Cantegreil-Kallen Inge, Dub Timothée, Rouquette Alexandra, Rigaud Anne-Sophie

机构信息

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Gerontology, Hôpital Broca, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 12;17(5):e117. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3717.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.3717
PMID:25967983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4468784/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although several face-to-face programs are dedicated to informal caregivers of persons with dementia, they are not always accessible to overburdened or isolated caregivers. Based on a face-to-face intervention program, we adapted and designed a Web-based fully automated psychoeducational program (called Diapason) inspired by a cognitive approach.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate through a pilot unblinded randomized controlled trial the efficacy and acceptability of a Web-based psychoeducational program for informal caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease (PWAD) based on a mixed methods research design.

METHODS

We recruited and randomized offline 49 informal caregivers of a PWAD in a day care center in Paris, France. They either received the Web-based intervention and usual care for 3 months (experimental group, n=25) or only usual care (control group, n=24). Caregivers' perceived stress (PSS-14, primary outcome), self-efficacy, burden, perceived health status, and depression (secondary outcomes) were measured during 3 face-to-face on-site visits: at baseline, at the end of the program (month 3), and after follow-up (month 6). Additionally, semistructured interviews were conducted with experimental group caregivers at month 6 and examined with thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analysis did not show significant differences in self-perceived stress between the experimental and control groups (P=.98). The experimental group significantly improved their knowledge of the illness (d=.79, P=.008) from baseline to month 3. Of the 25 participants allocated to the experimental group, 17 (71%) finished the protocol and entirely viewed at least 10 of 12 online sessions. On average, participants used the website 19.72 times (SD 12.88) and were connected for 262.20 minutes (SD 270.74). The results of the satisfaction questionnaire showed that most participants considered the program to be useful (95%, 19/20), clear (100%, 20/20), and comprehensive (85%, 17/20). Significant correlations were found between relationship and caregivers' program opinion (P=.01). Thus, positive opinions were provided by husbands and sons (3/3), whereas qualified opinions were primarily reported by daughters (8/11). Female spouses expressed negative (2/3) or neutral opinions (1/3). Caregivers expected more dynamic content and further interaction with staff and peers.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, quantitative results were inconclusive owing to small sample size. Qualitative results indicated/showed little acceptance of the program and high expectations from caregivers. Caregivers did not rule out their interest in this kind of intervention provided that it met their needs. More dynamic, personalized, and social interventions are desirable. Our recruitment issues pointed out the necessity of in-depth studies about caregivers' help-seeking behaviors and readiness factors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01430286; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01430286 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation/6KxHaRspL).

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19d9/4468784/cfb4919f636e/jmir_v17i5e117_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19d9/4468784/3f10b77de6c7/jmir_v17i5e117_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19d9/4468784/82c28d95212a/jmir_v17i5e117_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19d9/4468784/cfb4919f636e/jmir_v17i5e117_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19d9/4468784/3f10b77de6c7/jmir_v17i5e117_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19d9/4468784/82c28d95212a/jmir_v17i5e117_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19d9/4468784/cfb4919f636e/jmir_v17i5e117_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

尽管有几个面对面的项目是专门针对痴呆症患者的非正式照料者的,但负担过重或孤立无援的照料者并不总是能够参与其中。基于一个面对面干预项目,我们改编并设计了一个基于网络的全自动心理教育项目(称为“全音阶”),该项目受到认知方法的启发。

目的

本研究旨在通过一项试点非盲随机对照试验,基于混合方法研究设计,评估一个基于网络的心理教育项目对阿尔茨海默病患者(PWAD)非正式照料者的疗效和可接受性。

方法

我们在法国巴黎的一个日托中心招募了49名PWAD的非正式照料者,并将他们线下随机分组。他们要么接受为期3个月的基于网络的干预和常规护理(实验组,n = 25),要么只接受常规护理(对照组,n = 24)。在3次面对面的现场访视中测量照料者的感知压力(PSS - 14,主要结局)、自我效能感、负担、感知健康状况和抑郁(次要结局):基线时、项目结束时(第3个月)和随访后(第6个月)。此外,在第6个月对实验组照料者进行了半结构化访谈,并进行了主题分析。

结果

意向性分析显示,实验组和对照组在自我感知压力方面没有显著差异(P = 0.98)。从基线到第3个月,实验组对疾病的了解显著提高(d = 0.79,P = 0.008)。在分配到实验组的25名参与者中,17名(71%)完成了方案并完整观看了12个在线课程中的至少10个。参与者平均使用该网站19.72次(标准差12.88),连接时长为262.20分钟(标准差270.74)。满意度调查问卷的结果显示,大多数参与者认为该项目有用(95%,19/20)、清晰(100%,20/20)且全面(85%,17/20)。在关系与照料者对项目的评价之间发现了显著相关性(P = 0.01)。因此,丈夫和儿子给出了积极评价(3/3),而主要是女儿给出了有保留的评价(8/11)。女性配偶表达了负面(2/3)或中性评价(1/3)。照料者期望有更具活力的内容以及与工作人员和同伴的进一步互动。

结论

在本研究中,由于样本量小,定量结果尚无定论。定性结果表明该项目的接受度较低,而照料者的期望较高。照料者不排除对这类干预措施感兴趣,前提是它能满足他们的需求。更具活力、个性化和社交性的干预措施是可取的。我们的招募问题指出了深入研究照料者寻求帮助行为和准备因素的必要性。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01430286;http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01430286(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation/6KxHaRspL)

相似文献

1
A web-based psychoeducational program for informal caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial.一项针对阿尔茨海默病患者非正式照料者的基于网络的心理教育项目:一项试点随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 12;17(5):e117. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3717.
2
Evaluating the efficacy of a web-based program (diapason) for informal caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease: protocol for a randomized clinical trial.评估基于网络的项目(Diapason)对阿尔茨海默病患者非正式照料者的疗效:一项随机临床试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2013 Dec 6;2(2):e55. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2978.
3
A web-based program for informal caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease: an iterative user-centered design.一款针对阿尔茨海默病患者非正式照料者的在线程序:以用户为中心的迭代设计。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Sep 15;3(3):e46. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3607.
4
Effectiveness of a Blended Care Self-Management Program for Caregivers of People With Early-Stage Dementia (Partner in Balance): Randomized Controlled Trial.针对早期痴呆症患者照料者的混合式护理自我管理项目(平衡伙伴项目)的有效性:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 13;20(7):e10017. doi: 10.2196/10017.
5
The Effect of Guided Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Patients With Depressive Symptoms and Heart Failure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的认知行为疗法对伴有抑郁症状的心力衰竭患者的影响:一项初步随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 3;18(8):e194. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5556.
6
Effects of a Web-Based Intervention for Stress Reduction in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的初级保健减压干预措施的效果:一项整群随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 12;18(2):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4246.
7
RHAPSODY - Internet-based support for caregivers of people with young onset dementia: program design and methods of a pilot study.狂想曲——为早发性痴呆患者的照顾者提供基于互联网的支持:一项试点研究的项目设计与方法
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Dec;28(12):2091-2099. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001186. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
8
A Comparison of Users and Nonusers of a Web-Based Intervention for Carers of Older Persons With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Mixed Methods Secondary Analysis.针对患有阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症老年人的照护者的基于网络干预措施使用者与非使用者的比较:混合方法二次分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 17;21(10):e14254. doi: 10.2196/14254.
9
Overcoming Addictions, a Web-Based Application, and SMART Recovery, an Online and In-Person Mutual Help Group for Problem Drinkers, Part 2: Six-Month Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial and Qualitative Feedback From Participants.基于网络的应用程序“克服成瘾”以及针对问题饮酒者的线上及线下互助小组“SMART康复法”,第2部分:随机对照试验的六个月结果及参与者的定性反馈
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Oct 4;18(10):e262. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5508.
10
Effects of the Web Behavior Change Program for Activity and Multimodal Pain Rehabilitation: Randomized Controlled Trial.网络行为改变计划对活动及多模式疼痛康复的影响:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Oct 5;18(10):e265. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5634.

引用本文的文献

1
A Process Evaluation of the UK Randomised Trial Evaluating 'iSupport', an Online e-Health Intervention for Adult Carers of People Living with Dementia.一项针对英国随机试验的过程评估,该试验评估了“iSupport”,这是一种针对痴呆症患者成年护理者的在线电子健康干预措施。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;15(8):1107. doi: 10.3390/bs15081107.
2
Exploring usability characteristics in computer-based digital health technologies for family caregivers of people with chronic progressive conditions: A scoping review.探索针对患有慢性进行性疾病患者的家庭护理人员的基于计算机的数字健康技术的可用性特征:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 11;11:20552076251365141. doi: 10.1177/20552076251365141. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A web-based program for informal caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease: an iterative user-centered design.一款针对阿尔茨海默病患者非正式照料者的在线程序:以用户为中心的迭代设计。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Sep 15;3(3):e46. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3607.
2
Raising the standard of applied dementia care research: addressing the implementation error.提高应用痴呆症护理研究的标准:解决实施错误问题。
Aging Ment Health. 2014 Sep;18(7):809-14. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.899977. Epub 2014 May 12.
3
Caregiver burden: a clinical review.照顾者负担:临床综述。
Co-designed films to reduce care burden in India: The Moving Pictures pilot trial.
共同设计影片以减轻印度的护理负担:动态影像试点试验
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Aug;21(8):e70531. doi: 10.1002/alz.70531.
4
Online Interventions for Family Carers of People with Dementia That Focus on Support Strategies for Daily Living: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的在线干预措施:聚焦日常生活支持策略的混合方法系统评价
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;15(7):863. doi: 10.3390/bs15070863.
5
The Knowledge of Caregivers About Care for People Living With Dementia and Its Associations in Nursing Homes and Home Care-A Quantitative Study.护理人员对痴呆症患者护理的认知及其在养老院和家庭护理中的关联——一项定量研究
Nurs Open. 2025 Jul;12(7):e70263. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70263.
6
Perspectives and Experiences of Family Caregivers Using Supportive Mobile Apps in Dementia Care: Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research.痴呆症护理中使用支持性移动应用程序的家庭照顾者的观点与体验:定性研究的元综合分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jun 18;13:e65983. doi: 10.2196/65983.
7
Digital Health Literacy and Physical Activity Programme for Improvement of Quality of Life in Caregivers of People with Dementia (CAREFIT): Study Protocol.改善痴呆症患者照料者生活质量的数字健康素养与身体活动计划(CAREFIT):研究方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 22;13(11):1219. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111219.
8
Implementation of Telemedicine for Patients With Dementia and Their Caregivers: Scoping Review.针对痴呆症患者及其照护者的远程医疗实施:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 5;27:e65667. doi: 10.2196/65667.
9
Completeness of Telehealth Interventions Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials for Caregivers of People With Dementia: Systematic Review.痴呆症患者照料者随机对照试验中远程医疗干预报告的完整性:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 20;27:e53737. doi: 10.2196/53737.
10
Interventions delivered by primary or community healthcare professionals to support people living at home with dementia with activities of daily living: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.初级保健或社区保健专业人员为支持居家痴呆症患者进行日常生活活动而提供的干预措施:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):860. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05465-5.
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1052-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.304.
4
The effectiveness of an Internet support forum for carers of people with dementia: a pre-post cohort study.一个针对痴呆症患者照料者的互联网支持论坛的有效性:一项前后队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 28;16(2):e68. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3166.
5
Evaluating the efficacy of a web-based program (diapason) for informal caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease: protocol for a randomized clinical trial.评估基于网络的项目(Diapason)对阿尔茨海默病患者非正式照料者的疗效:一项随机临床试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2013 Dec 6;2(2):e55. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2978.
6
A systematic review of Internet-based supportive interventions for caregivers of patients with dementia.基于互联网的支持性干预措施在痴呆患者照顾者中的系统评价。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;29(4):331-44. doi: 10.1002/gps.4016. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
7
What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review.定性研究能为随机对照试验做些什么?系统图谱综述。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):e002889. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002889.
8
Community management that works: how to build and sustain a thriving online health community.行之有效的社区管理:如何建立并维持一个蓬勃发展的在线健康社区。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jun 11;15(6):e119. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2501.
9
Factors associated with caregiver readiness to use nonpharmacologic strategies to manage dementia-related behavioral symptoms.与照顾者准备使用非药物策略来管理与痴呆相关的行为症状相关的因素。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;29(1):93-102. doi: 10.1002/gps.3979. Epub 2013 May 7.
10
Technology-driven interventions for caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review.技术驱动的痴呆症患者照料者干预措施:系统评价。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2013 May;28(3):216-22. doi: 10.1177/1533317513481091. Epub 2013 Mar 25.