Downs Danielle Symons, Smyth Joshua M, Heron Kristin E, Feinberg Mark E, Hillemeier Marianne, Materia Frank T
Exercise Psychology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Penn State University.
Department of OBGYN, Penn State College of Medicine.
J Technol Behav Sci. 2019 Mar;4(1):33-41. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
Despite increased interest in developing mobile technology-based interventions, little research has examined preferences and beliefs about using smartphones for psychosocial or health behavior change interventions, particularly among women with overweight/obesity residing in rural communities.
The aims of this study were to examine the beliefs of pre- and interconceptional women about using smartphones and to examine the extent to which women's preferences for using smartphones changed as a result of participating in study interviews.
Forty women ( age = 28.2 years; BMI = 31.4; 50% obese) participated in one-time 90 minute interviews and completed questionnaires before and after the interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the frequency of women's preferences for using smartphones and applications. Interviews were downloaded and transcribed; principles of thematic analysis were used to code the interviews and identify themes.
Women identified advantages of using smartphones for behavioral interventions, including being convenient, useful, and able to provide social support. Primary disadvantages were annoyances and needing technology support for phone problems. Participating in interviews also resulted in significant improvements in participant willingness to use smartphones in health behavior change interventions.
The study findings highlight the importance of understanding beliefs about using smartphones before designing effective smartphone-based interventions, especially for use with pre- and interconceptional women with overweight/obesity who may have unique challenges with study adherence. These findings also suggest beliefs about smartphone utility can be improved over the course of a brief interview that taps into technology-related preferences.
Identifying advantages/disadvantages of smartphone use can inform intervention design. Future research should explore how to capitalize on strategies that enable the benefits of technology (e.g., convenience, social support) while minimizing participant barriers (e.g., distractions) to promote behavior change and facilitate intervention compliance.
尽管人们对开发基于移动技术的干预措施的兴趣日益浓厚,但很少有研究探讨使用智能手机进行心理社会或健康行为改变干预的偏好和信念,尤其是在居住在农村社区的超重/肥胖女性中。
本研究的目的是考察孕前和孕早期女性对使用智能手机的信念,并考察女性使用智能手机的偏好因参与研究访谈而改变的程度。
40名女性(年龄=28.2岁;体重指数=31.4;50%为肥胖)参加了一次90分钟的访谈,并在访谈前后完成了问卷调查。描述性统计用于考察女性使用智能手机和应用程序的偏好频率。访谈内容被下载并转录;采用主题分析原则对访谈进行编码并确定主题。
女性确定了使用智能手机进行行为干预的优点,包括方便、有用以及能够提供社会支持。主要缺点是烦扰以及手机问题需要技术支持。参与访谈还显著提高了参与者在健康行为改变干预中使用智能手机的意愿。
研究结果强调了在设计有效的基于智能手机的干预措施之前了解使用智能手机信念的重要性,特别是对于超重/肥胖的孕前和孕早期女性,她们在坚持研究方面可能面临独特的挑战。这些发现还表明,在一次简短的访谈过程中,通过挖掘与技术相关的偏好,可以改善对智能手机效用的信念。
确定使用智能手机的优点/缺点可为干预设计提供参考。未来的研究应探索如何利用能够发挥技术优势(如方便、社会支持)的策略,同时尽量减少参与者的障碍(如干扰),以促进行为改变并提高干预依从性。